|
|
|
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.39, no.2, 2006³â, pp.145-156
|
±ÝÈ£° ¼ö°è¿¡¼ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû ÇÏõ °Ç°µµ ¹× ÀÌÈÇÐÀû Ư¼º
( Biological Stream Health and Physico-chemical Characteristics in the Keum-Ho River Watershed ) |
| ±Ç¿µ¼ö;¾È±¤±¹; Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇкÎ;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇкÎ;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº 2004³â 8¿ùºÎÅÍ 2005³â 6¿ù±îÁö ±ÝÈ£°ÀÇ 5°³ Á¶»çÁöÁ¡¿¡¼ ´Ùº¯¼ö ¸ÞÆ®¸¯ ¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¹°¸®Àû ¼½ÄÁö°Ç°µµ Æò°¡(QHEI)¹× »ý¸ôÇÐÀû °Ç°µµ Æò°¡¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ Á¢±Ù¹æ½ÄÀº º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼ Á÷Á¢ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ Á¤¼ºÀû ½ÄÁöÆò°¡Áö¼ö(QHEI),¾î·ù¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû °Ç°µµ Áö¼ö(IBI)¹× ȯ°æºÎ¿¡ ȹµæÇÑ Áö³ 10³â°£(1995 ${sim}$ 2004)ÀÇ ¼öÁú ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ÀÚ·á¿Í ºñ±³ Æò°¡¿¡ ±â¹ÝÀ» µÎ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ À§ÇØ ÀÌ¹Ì Çѱ¹ÀÇ Áö¿ªÀû »ýÅ Ư¼º¿¡ ¸Â°Ô °³¹ßµÈ An(2003)ÀÇ ¸ðµ¨ÀÌ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû °Ç°µµ Æò°¡¿¡ Àû¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÃÑüÀûÀÎ °Ç°¼ºÆò°¡EPA(1993)¹× Barbour et al. (1999)ÀÇ ±âÁØ¿¡ µû¸£¸é, ±ÝÈ£°ÀÇ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû °Ç°µµ Áö¼ö´Â Æò±Õ 30À̾ú°í, ÁöÁ¡¿¡µû¶ó 23 ${sim}$ 48±îÁöÀÇ º¯À̸¦ º¸À̸ç, °Ç°µµ´Â º¸Åë»óÅÂ(Fair)·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±ÝÈ£°ÀÇ ÀÌÈÇÐÀû ¼öÁúÀÚ·á ¼®¿¡ µû¸£¸é, 1995³âºÎÅÍ 2004³â °¡Áö 10³â µ¿¾È »ý¹°ÇÐÀû »ê¼Ò¿ä±¸·®(BOD), ÈÇÐÀû ¼Ò¿ä±¸·®(COD), Àü±âÀüµµµµ(Conductivity), ÃÑÀÎ (TP), ÃÑÁú¼Ò(TN), ÃѺÎÀ¯¹°(755)Àº Á¶»çÁöÁ¡º°, °èÀýº°, ¿¬º°·Î ¿À¿°³óµµ º¯È ÆøÀÌ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °èÀý¿¡ µû¸¥ °¿ì·®¿¡ BOD, COD, TP, TSS, ConductivityÀº »ó·ùÁöÁ¡ 1¿¡¼´Â ¿µÇâÀÌ Àû¾úÁö¸¸ ÇÏ·ù·Î ¿Ã¼ö·Ï ¸¹Àº ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ¾Æ À¯·®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Èñ¼®Çö»óÀ¸·Î À帶ÈÄ¿¡ ¼öÁúÀÌ Çâ»óµÇ´Â ¾ç»óÀ¸·Î º¸¾Æ °¿ì°¡ ¼öÁúÀÇ ÀÌÂ÷ÇÐÀû º¯ÀÌ¿¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ä¼ÒÀÓÀÌ È®ÀεǾú´Ù. ±ºÁýºÐ¼®¿¡ µû¸£¸é Á¾´Ù¾çµµ Áö¼ö´Â ÁöÁ¡ 1¿¡¼ ÃÖ´ëÄ¡¸¦ º¸¿´°í(H'=0.781), ÁöÁ¡ 3¿¡¼´Â ²ô¸®ÀÇ Âø½ÇÇÑ ¿ìÁ¡µµ¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ´ëÁ¶ÀûÀ¸·Î Àâ½Ä¼º, ³»¼ºÁ¾ ºñÀ²ÀÌ »ó·ùº¸´Ù ÇÏ·ù·Î °¥¼ö·Ï ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ÇÏ·ùÀÇ ÁöÁ¡µéÀº ¼öȯ°æ»ýÅÂÀÇ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû °Ç°µµ Çâ»óÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© º¹¿øÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÔÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â ¹ÙÀÌ´Ù.obacteriaµµ Á¶·ùÀÇ ¹ø½ÄÀÌ ¿Õ¼ºÇÏ´ø 6${sim}$9¿ùº¸´Ù´Â 4¿ù°ú 1¿ù¿¡ ³ôÀº ºñÀ²·Î °ËÃâµÇ¾ú´Âµ¥ ÀÌ´Â À̽ñ⿡ ÁÖ¾ÏÈ£¿¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â À¯±â¹°ÀÇ ºÐÇØ ¹× ÀÚÁ¤ÀÛ¿ë¿¡±âÀÎÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. ¹Ý¸é CF group¼¼±Õ±ºÀº 1¿ùÀ» Á¦¿ÜÇϰí´Â °ÅÀÇ À¯»çÇÑ ºñÀ²·Î °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¾Æ¿ï·¯ ÁúȼøÈ¯¿¡ °ü¿©ÇÏ´Â Áúȼ¼±Õµµ µ¿Àý±â¿¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç À̶§ ¼ö°èÀÇ ³ôÀº DO°¡ ±×µéÀÇ È°¼º¿¡ ÁÖ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.¾ú°í ½Å¸ÀÀÌ ´ú ´À²¸Áö´Â ¹Ý¸é¿¡, »ö»ó º¯È¿¡¼´Â ¹®Á¦Á¡ÀÌ ¹ß°ßµÇ¾î ÇâÈÄ ÀÌ ºÎºÐÀ» º¸¿ÏÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ®¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ. ¿¬¸¶¹æ¹ý °£¿¡ »óÈ£ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. FE-SEM°üÂû¿¡¼ ·¹ÁøÀü»öÁ¦¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÑ ÈÄÀÇ Ç¥¸éÀº ¸ðµç ±º¿¡¼ ´ëüÀûÀ¸·Î ÆòȰÇÑ Ç¥¸éÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. 4. µ¿ÀÏÇÑ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø°ú ¿¬¸¶¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ó¸®µÈ ±º¿¡¼ ·¹ÁøÀü»öÁ¦ Àû¿ë Àü°ú ÈÄÀÇ Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ °ªÀº M1B±ºÀÌ M1±ºº¸´Ù, S1B±ºÀÌ S1±ºº¸´Ù Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, M4B±º°ú M5B±ºÀº °¢°¢ M4±º°ú M5±º º¸´Ù. ±×¸®°í S5B±ºÀº S5±º º¸´Ù Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù (p<0.05). º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿© º¸¸é, º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¶ó Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµÀÇ ¼ø¼´Â ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, polyester strip ÇÏ¿¡¼ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÌ ÁßÇÕµÈ °æ¿ì °¡Àå ³·Àº Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ °ª°ú ÆòȰÇÑ Ç¥¸éÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î anishing bur´Â °¡Àå ³ôÀº Ra°ª°ú °ÅÄ£ Ç¥¸éÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ¿´´Ù. Enhance, Astropol, carbide finishing bur·Î ¿¬¸¶ÇÑ Ç¥¸éÀº ·¹ÁøÀü»öÁ¦ÀÇ »ç¿ëÀ¸·Î ÆòȰÇÑ Ç¥¸éÀ» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÁö¸¸, polyester strip°ú Sof-Lex disc·Î ¾ò¾îÁø Ç¥¸éÀº ·¹ÁøÀü»öÁ¦ÀÇ »ç¿ëÀ¸·Î Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµÀÇ °³¼±ÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁöÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.^{11}C]raclopride$ PETÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºñÈí¿¬ Á¤»óÀο¡¼ Èí¿¬¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ µµÆÄ¹Î À¯¸®¸¦ ¿µ»óÈ ¹× Á¤·®È ÇÏ¿´°í, Èí¿¬¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¼±Á¶Ã¼³» µµÆÄ¹Î À¯¸®´Â Èí¿¬½Ã |
|
| The objective of this study was to evaluate biological health conditions and physicochemical status using multi-metric models at five sites of the Keum-Ho River during August 2004 and June 2005. The research approach was based on a qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI), index of biological integrity (IBI) using fish assemblage, and long-term chemical data (1995 ${sim}$ 2004), which was obtained from the Ministry of Environment, Korea. For the biological health assessments, regional model of the IBI in Korea (An,2003), was applied for this study. Mean IBI in the river was 30 and varied from 23 to 48 depending on the sampling sites. The river health was judged to be "fair condition", according to the stream health criteria of US EPA (1993) and Barbour et al. (1999). According to the analysis of the chemical water quality data of the river, BOD, COD, conductivity, TP, TN, and TSS largely varied epending on the sampling sites, seasons and years. Variabilities of some parameters including BOD, COD, TP, TN, and conductivity were greater in the downstream than in the upstream reach. This phenomenon was evident in the dilution by the rain during the monsoon. This indicates that precipitation is a very important factor of the chemical variations of water quality. Community analyses showed that species diversity index was highest (H=0.78) in the site 1, while community dominance index was highest in the site 3, where Opsariichthys uncirostris largely dominated. In contrast, the proportions of omnivore and tolerant species were greater in the downstream reach, than in the upstream reach. Overall, this study suggests that some sites in the downstream reach may need to restore the aquatic ecosystem for better biological health. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| fish assemblage;biological integrity;chemical water quality;river; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.39, no.2, 2006³â, pp.145-156
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200618317186921)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|