¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.39, no.2, 2006³â, pp.257-264
Á¶·ù¹ß»ý °æº¸ ¹× È£¼ö ¼öÁú°ü¸®¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÀÚµ¿ÃøÁ¤±âÀÇ Àû¿ë ¹× Ÿ´ç¼º ¿¬±¸
( Evaluation and Application of Algae Online Analyzer for Alarming Algal Bloom and Water Quality Management of Korean Reservoirs )
Ȳ¼ö¿Á;ÇѸí¼ö;±è¹éÈ£; Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ÆÈ´ç±Ç °ü¸®´Ü;Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ÆÈ´ç±Ç °ü¸®´Ü;ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ »ý¸í°úÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
È£¼ö³» ¿±·Ï¼Ò¸¦ »ó½ÃÀûÀ¸·Î ÃøÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ÀÚµ¿ÃøÁ¤±â(AOA)¸¦ Àû¿ëÇϰí Ÿ´ç¼ºÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ¼­¿ï-°æ±âÁö¿ª »ó¼ö¿ø¼öÀÎ ÆÈ´çÈ£ ÇöÀå¼ö°¡ Á÷Á¢ À¯ÀԵǴ Á¦2Ãë¼öÀå¿¡¼­ ½Ã·á¸¦ äÃëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®Àº Á¶·ù ÇöÁ¸·® ¹× Á¾ Á¶¼º ºÐ¼®, Èí±¤±¤µµ¹ý°ú ÀÚµ¿ÃøÁ¤±â¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿±·Ï¼ÒÃøÁ¤ µîÀ» µ¿½Ã¿¡ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© ±× °á°ú¸¦ ºñ±³ Á¶»çÇϰí ÇöÀå Àû¿ë °¡´É¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú. Á¶·ùºÐ·ù±ºº° ¿±·Ï¼Ò ±â¿©µµ´Â ±ÔÁ¶·ù°¡ 83.6%·Î °¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ³ìÁ¶·ù, ³²Á¶·ù, Å©¸³ÅäÁ¶·ùÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÚµ¿ÃøÁ¤¹ý°ú Èí±¤±¤µµ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿±·Ï¼Ò ³óµµ´Â ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î ¸Å¿ì À¯ÀÇÇÑ »ó°ü¼ºÀ» º¸¿´À¸³ª(.=0.87, n=302, p<0.001), ½Ã±â ¶Ç´Â °ø Á¶¼º¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ÀÚµ¿ÃøÁ¤±âÀÇ ¹Î°¨Æ÷´Â Å©¸³ÅäÁ¶ (r=0.83, p=0.00154)¿Í ±ÔÁ¶ (r=0.73,p=0.010)°¡ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ÇöÁ¸·®ÀÌ ³·Àº ³ìÁ¶(r=-0.13)¿Í ³²Á¶(r=-0.16)¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â »ó°ü¼ºÀ» º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. °á°úÀûÀ¸·Î ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÀÚµ¿ÃøÁ¤¹ýÀº °íÀüÀûÀÎ ¾Æ¼¼Åæ ÃßÃâ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ºñÇØ ½Å¼Ó¼º°ú °æÁ¦¼ºÀº ¸Å¿ì ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö¸¸ ÃâÇöÁ¾ÀÇ ¹Ðµµ³ª Á¾ õÀÌ µîÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ Á¶·ùºÐ¼® ¹× ¿±·Ï¼Ò Á÷Á¢ÃøÁ¤ µîÀÌ º´ÇàµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù.
In order to evaluate the application of Algae Online Analyzer (AOA), an instrument of automatic measurement of chlorophyll a concentration, was tested and compared with the acetone extraction method on the basis of microscopic counting of phytoplankton in field water (Paltang Reservoir). We simultaneously conducted AOA operation and extraction method with the same water sample, to compare both results of chlorophyll a measurement. Phytoplankton were enumerated by inverted microscope with the Sedgwick-Rafter chamber, and classified into the genus or species. According to the AOA measurement, the diatom most (83.6%) strongly contributed to the total chlorophyll a concentration, followed by chlorophyceae> cyanophyceae>cryptophyceae. Overall, the results of both AOA and extraction method showed a similar trend and significant correlation (r=0.87, n=302, p<0.001), however, there were some differences according to the season and species. In particular, the relationship between AOA Chl-a density of the diatom (r=0.73, p=0.010) and cyrptophyceae (.=0.83, p=0.00154) were siginificant, while chlorophyceae (r= -0.13) and cyanophyceae (r= -0.16) showed no clear relationship during the study period. Although we can not fully understand why there was difference between both mothods, AOA application for alarming algal bloom and water quality management during the algal bloom appears to be very relevant. However, the further study or technical upgrade of AOA measurement is required, especially in the case of low density of phytoplankton or species-specific measurement.
 
Ű¿öµå
alarming;Algae Online Analyzer;automatic fluorometer;water quality;
 
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.39, no.2, 2006³â, pp.257-264
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200618317186984)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿