¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.39, no.2, 2006³â, pp.245-256
Æ÷ȹµµ±¸¿¡ µû¸¥ Ⱦ¼ºÈ£³» ¾î·ùäÁý È¿°úºÐ¼®
( Sampling Effects on Fishing Gears in the Hoengseong Resevoir )
À念¼ö;À̱¤¿­;ÃÖÁرæ;¼­Áø¿ø;ÃÖÀç¼®; °­¿ø´ëÇб³ »ý¹°Çаú;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ »ý¹°Çаú;»óÁö´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇаú;Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¿ø ¼öÀÚ¿øÈ¯°æ¿¬±¸¼Ò;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ »ý¹°Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
»ï°¢¸Á(fyke net)°ú »ïÁßÀÚ¸Á(trammel net)ÀÇ ¸Á¸ñÀ» ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© Ⱦ¼ºÈ£¿¡¼­ 2005³â 4¿ùºÎÅÍ 10¿ù±îÁöÀÇ ±â°£¿¡ Æ÷ȹµÈ ¾î·ù´Â ÃÑ 8°ú 22Á¾ 8,626°³Ã¼¿´°í, »ýü·®Àº 122.9kgÀ̾ú´Ù. ÀÌÁß »ï°¢¸Á¿¡¼­ 8°ú 21Á¾ 8,168°³Ã¼°¡ ÃâÇöÇÏ¿´°í »ýü·®Àº 96.6kgÀ̾ú°í, »ïÁßÀÚ¸Á¿¡¼­ 6°ú16Á¾ 458°³Ã¼¿´°í »ýü·®Àº 26.3kgÀ̾ú´Ù ºÐ¼®°á°ú »ïÁßÀÚ¸ÁÀÌ »ï°¢¸Á¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ÃâÇöÁ¾, °³Ã¼¼ö, ±×¸®°í »ýü·® ¸ðµÎ ÇöÀúÇÏ°Ô ³·¾Ò´Ù. ÇÑÆí ÃâÇöÁ¾ÀÇ ¼ö´Â ¸Á¸ñÀÇ Å©±â°¡ ÀÛ¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¸Á¸ñÀÌ ÀÛÀº »ï°¢¸ÁÀº ÀÛÀº Ä¡¾îºÎÅÍ ´ëÇü¾î·ù±îÁö ¸ðµÎ äÁýÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ±× Áö¿ªÀÇ ¼¼ºÎÀûÀÎ ¾î·ù»óÀ» Á¤¼ºÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®Çϴµ¥ ¾Ë¸ÂÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀÌ°í »ïÃæÀÚ¸ÁÀº ÀûÀýÇÑ Å©±âÀÇ ¸Á¸ñÀ» »ç¿ëÇÒ °æ¿ì Á¶»çÁö¿ªÀÇ ÃâÇöÁ¾À» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϴµ¥ ¸Å¿ì È¿°úÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
Fish community in the Hoengseong Reservoir was investigated from April to October 2005. The total number of fish caught from the period was 8,626 fish representing 22 species and 8 families, using tyke net and trammel net. Besides biomass was 122.9 kg. In the fyke net, 8,168 individuals caught during the period represented 21 species belonged to 8 families, its biomass was 90.6 kg. On the other hand, 458 individuals caught in the trammel net during the period represented 16species belonged to 6 families, its biomass was 26.3 kg. The results showed that the trammel net had lower number of species, individuals, and less biomass compared to those of the tyke net. Number of species confirmed was increased according as mesh size of the net was smaller. Besides, the fyke net with small mesh size was able to collect not only small-sized fish but also large-sized fish so that it was suitable to study qualitative and quantitative analysis of fish fauna in detail. Whereas, the trammel net with proper mesh size was effective to determine composition of fish species in the studied area.
 
Ű¿öµå
fishing gear;fish community;trammel net;fyke net;Hoengseong Reservoir;
 
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.39, no.2, 2006³â, pp.245-256
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200618317186979)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿