|
|
|
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.39, no.4, 2006³â, pp.424-434
|
ÆÈ´çÈ£ »ýŰ迡¼ µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ¹ÚÅ׸®¾Æ ¼·½Ä ¹× ¿µÇâÀÎÀÚ
( Zooplankton Grazing on Bacteria and Factors Affecting Bacterial C-flux in Lake Paldang Ecosystem ) |
| ¾ö¼ºÈ;Ȳ¼øÁø; °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°úÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ¹ÚÅ׸®¾Æ-µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ¿µ¾çÀû °ü°è¿Í ÀÌ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀεéÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© 2005³â 4¿ùºÎÅÍ 12¿ù±îÁö ÆÈ´çÈ£ »ýŰèÀÇ ¿µ¾ç»óŰ¡ ´Ù¸¥ ÆÈ´ç´ï¾Õ°ú °æ¾Èõ µÎ ÁöÁ¡À» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ¿©°úÀ²°ú ¹ÚÅ׸®¾ÆÀÇ C-flux¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀº ¼ÒÇü (Microzooplankton, MICZ: 60-200 ${mu}m$)°ú ´ëÇüµ¿¹°Çöûũſ(Macrozooplankton, MACZ: >200 ${mu}m$)À¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© °¢ ±×·ì¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© º°µµ·Î ¼·½Ä·üÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÎ ÁöÁ¡¿¡¼ ¹ÚÅ׸®¾Æ ¹Ðµµ¿Í °èÀýÀû º¯È¾ç»óÀº À¯»çÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀº µÎ ÁöÁ¡ ¸ðµÎ À±Ãæ·ù(Brachionus, Keratella, Polyathra)°¡ ¼öÀûÀ¸·Î Å©°Ô ¿ìÁ¡ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ź¼Ò»ý¹°·®Àº Áö°¢·ù(Daphnia)°¡ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò´Ù. µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀº º½¿¡ ³ôÀº ¹Ðµµ¿Í ź¼Ò»ý¹°·®À» º¸¿´°í ¿©¸§Ã¶ ÁýÁß°¿ì ½Ã±â¸¦ ±âÁ¡À¸·Î Å©°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÁöÁ¡º°·Î´Â °æ¾Èõ¿¡¼ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³ôÀº ź¼Ò»ý¹°·®ÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¹ÚÅ׸®¾Æ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ µ¿¹°Çöûũſ ¿©°úÀ²Àº ÆÈ´ç´ï¾Õ¿¡¼ º½, °¡À»Ã¶¿¡ ³ô°í ¿©¸§Ã¶¿¡ ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â °èÀý¿¡ µû¸¥ º¯È°¡ ¸íÈ®ÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ ¹Ý¸é, °æ¾Èõ¿¡¼´Â ÆÈ´ç´ï¾Õ°ú´Â ´Þ¸® ¿©¸§Ã¶¿¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. C-flux´Â µÎ ÁöÁ¡ ¸ðµÎ º½Ã¶°ú °¡À»Ã¶¿¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±ºÁý¿©°úÀ²°ú ¹ÚÅ׸®¾Æ C-flux´Â MACZ°¡ MICZº¸´Ù ³ô¾Ò°í, ±× Á¤µµ´Â °æ¾Èõ¿¡¼ ´õ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¿©¸§Ã¶ÀÇ ÁýÁß°¿ì·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÂªÀº ü·ù½Ã°£°ú ¼öüÀÇ ±³¶õÀÌ µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ¼·½Ä¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇµÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú, ÆÈ´çÈ£ »ýŰ迡¼ ¹ÚÅ׸®¾Æ´Â µ¿¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ Áß¿äÇÑ ¸ÔÀÌ¿øÀ̸ç, ¶ÇÇÑ Çöûũſ ¸ÔÀ̸Á ³»¿¡¼ ¿¡³ÊÁö Àü´ÞÀ²Àº ¸ÔÀÌ¿ø°ú ¼·½ÄÀÚÀÇ »ý¹°·® ¹× Á¾Á¶¼º°ú °°Àº »ý¹°Àû ¿äÀΰú ÇÔ²² °¿ì¿Í °°Àº ¹°¸®ÀûÀÎ ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀáÀçÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇµÇ¾ú´Ù.1,s}$)Àº ¼ö¿ë¾×»óÀÇ Ãʱâ³óµµ¿Í´Â ¹«°üÇÏ°Ô ÅðÀû¹°ÀÇ CEC¿Í Ç¥¸éÀûÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºü¸¥ ºÎºÐ¿¡¼ÀÇ ÈíÂø¼Óµµ »ó¼ö ($k_{1,s}=10^{0.1}-10^{1.0};hr^{-1}$)´Â ´À¸° ºÎºÐ¿¡¼ÀÇ ÈíÂø¼Óµµ »ó¼ö ($k_{2,s}=10^{-2}-10^{-4};hr^{-1}$)º¸´Ù ÈξÀ ´õ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.±Õ Çʿ䷮º¸´Ù ºÎÁ·ÇÏ°Ô ¼·ÃëÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ºñÀ²ÀÌ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ¿µ¾ç±³À° Àü°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© º¼ ¶§ ¿µ¾çŵµ Á¡¼ö°¡ ±³À° ÈÄ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í, À¯ÀÇÀûÀÌÁö´Â ¾ÊÀ¸³ª ¿µ¾çÁö½Ä°ú ÀھƸ¸Á·µµµµ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¼º°Ý À¯Çü °Ë»ç °á°ú ¾ÆÁ÷ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÏ°Ô ¼º°Ý À¯ÇüÀ» °áÁ¤ÇÏÁö ¸øÇÑ ¾î¸°À̵éÀÇ ºñÀ²ÀÌ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼º°Ý À¯ÇüÀÇ °áÁ¤ ¿©ºÎ ¹× °¢ À¯ÇüÀ» ÂüÁ¶ÇÏ¿© ½Ä»ýȰ¿¡¼ ¿Ã¹Ù¸¥ ½Ä»ýȰ °ü¸® ´É·Â°ú ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÑ ¿µ¾çŵµ ¹× Áö½ÄÀ» ½ÀµæÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â ¿µ¾ç±³À°ÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.MI, üÁö¹æ·®, ƯÈ÷ Ç㸮µÑ·¹, ¾ûµ¢ÀÌ µÑ·¹, Ç㸮-¾ûµ¢ÀÌ µÑ·¹ºñ¿Í À¯ÀǼºÀÖ´Â »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸ÀÎ ¹Ý¸é Ç÷û ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ׷Ѱú Áß¼ºÁö¹æ, HDL-ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ×·Ñ, LDL-ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ×·Ñ ³óµµ¿Í´Â »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÃÑ ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ×·ÑÀº Áß¼ºÁö¹æ, LDL-ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ׷Ѱú À¯ÀǼºÀÖ´Â »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, Áß¼ºÁö¹æÀº LDL-ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ׷Ѱú ¾çÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦, HDL-ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ׷Ѱú´Â À½ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸À̰í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±Ã±ØÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ¸¸ ¾Æµ¿À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ Çб³ ³» üÁß Á¶Àý ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÌ ÀåÁ÷ÀûÀÎ È¿°ú¸¦ ¾ò±â À§Çؼ´Â ù°, ¹«¾ùº¸´Ù ¾Æµ¿ÀÌ ¼ºÀå±âÀÓÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ°ú ÇÔ²² ¾Æµ¿µéÀÇ ½ÄÀÌ, ¿îµ¿½À°ü ¹× ºñ¸¸°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ÇൿÀÇ º¯È°¡ »ýȰ °¡¿îµ¥ ±Ùº»ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀϾ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. µÑ°, üÁß Á¶Àý ÇÁ·Î±×·¥Àº ½ÄÀÌ ¹× ¿îµ¿ Áöµµ¿Í ¾Æ¿ï·¯ ±àÁ¤Àû °È(positive reinforcement)¿Í º¸»ó(reward)À» ÅëÇØ Ãæ |
|
| This study investigates bacteria-zooplankton grazing link and factors affecting their grazing relationship at trophically different two sites (Paldang Dam and Kyungan Stream) of Lake Paldang Ecosystem from April to December, 2005. Zooplankton were divided into two size groups; microzooplankton (MICZ) : 60-200 ${mu}m$ and macrozooplankton (MACZ): >200 ${mu}m$), and their grazing rates on bacteria were conducted for each size group separately. Bacterial abundance and seasonal change pattern were similar between two sites. MICZ, mostly rotifers (e.g., Brachionus, Keratella, Polyathra) were numerically dominant at both sites, while carbon biomass was highest in cladocerans. Zooplankton biomass was higher at the Kyungan Steam site compared to Paldang Dam site, and their high biomass during spring decreased as they were passing through the storm events in summer season at both sites. Zooplankton clearance rate (CR) was high in spring and autumn while low in summer at Paldang Dam site. However, zooplankton CR was high during the summer at Kyungan Stream site. Bacterial C-flux was high in spring and autumn when MACZ (esp. cladecerans) developed at a high biomass level at both sites. Overall, MACZ community CR and carbon flux (C-flux) were higher than those of MICZ, and the degree of difference between them was higher at Kyungan Stream site. Short hydraulic residence time and physical disturbance caused by summer storm event appeared to affect the zooplankton grazing on bacteria at both sites. The results of this study indicate that bacteria are potentially important carbon source of zooplankton, and that both biotic (e.g,, prey and predator taxa composition and abundance) and physical parameters appear to alter energy transfer in the planktonic food web of this river-reservoir hybrid system. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| bacteria;zooplankton;trophic link;clearance rate;carbon flux;Lake Paldang;river-reservoir hybrid system; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.39, no.4, 2006³â, pp.424-434
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200618317187751)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|