¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.39, no.4, 2006³â, pp.471-480
ºñÁ¡¿À¿°¿ø Á¦¾î¸¦ À§ÇÑ Àΰø½ÀÁöÀÇ °èÀýº¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ó¸®È¿À² Æò°¡
( Seasonal Performance of Constructed Wetland for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control )
ÇÔÁ¾È­;ÇÑÁ¤À±;±èÇüö;À±Ãá°æ; ;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°úÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ºñÁ¡¿À¿°¿ø Á¦¾î¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÇöÀå½ÇÇèÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸½Ã¼³Àº Àΰø½ÀÁö¿Í À¯¼öÁö¸¦ °¢°¢ 4°³¾¿ Á¶¼ºÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢°¢ÀÇ ¸éÀûÀº 0.8 ha¿Í 0.08 haÀ̰í, ÃÑ ¸éÀûÀº ¾à 3.6 haÀÌ´Ù. ½ÀÁöÀÇ À¯ÀÔ¼ö´Â Ãæ³² ´çÁø±ºÀÇ ¼®¹®´ã¼öÈ£·Î À¯ÀԵǴ ´çÁøÃµÀÇ ¹°À» ÆßÇÎÇÏ¿© »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÀÁöÀÇ ¼ö½ÉÀº ¿þ¾î¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »ýÀå±â (3¿ù${sim}$8¿ù)°ú µ¿Àý±â (12¿ù${sim}$2¿ù)¿¡ °¢°¢ 0.3 m¿Í 0.5 m¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ü·ù½Ã°£Àº 2${sim}$5ÀÏÀ̾ú´Ù. TP¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ¼öÁúÇ׸ñ¿¡¼­ ($BOD_5$, TSS, TN)»ýÀå±âº¸´Ù µ¿Àý±â¿¡ ´õ ³ôÀº³óµµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, $BOD_5$´Â µ¿Àý±â µ¿¾È¿¡ À¯Ãâ¼öÀÇ ³óµµ°¡ À¯ÀÔ¼öº¸´Ù ´õ ³ôÀº ³óµµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. µ¿Àý±â µ¿¾È¿¡ Á¦°ÅµÈ ºÎÇÏ·®Àº $BOD_5$, TSS´Â °¨¼ÒÇÑ ¹Ý¸é¿¡ TN°ú TP´Â °¨¼ÒÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í »ýÀå±â°ú ºñ½ÁÇÑ °ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ´Ù¸¥ ¿¬±¸ÀÚ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿¬±¸°á°úÀÎ NADB (North American Treatment Wetland Database)¿Í ºñ±³ÇØ º¸¸é $BOD_5$, TSS, TN, TP¸ðµÎ µ¿ÀÏ À¯ÀÔºÎÇÏ·®¿¡ ´ëÇØ ´ëºÎºÐ NADB¿Í ºñ½ÁÇϰųª ¾à°£ ³·Àº À¯Ãâ¼öÀÇ ³óµµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. µ¿Àý±â µ¿¾È¿¡ »ýÀå±â¿Í ºñ½ÁÇÑ ³óµµÀÇ À¯Ãâ¼ö¸¦ ¾ò±â À§Çؼ­´Â À¯ÀÔºÎÇÏ·®Àº »ýÀå±âº¸´Ù °¨¼Ò½ÃÄÑ Àû¿ëÇÏ¸é °¡´ÉÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸°á°ú Àΰø½ÀÁö´Â µ¿Àý±â¿¡µµ ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀΠó¸®À²À» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ºñÁ¡¿À¿°Á¦¾î¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
The field scale experiment was performed to examine the performance of the constructed wetland for nonpoint source (NPS) pollution loading reduction. Four sets (each set of 0.88 ha) of wetland (0.8 ha) and pond (0.08 ha) systems were used. Water flowing into the Seokmoon estuarine reservoir from the Dangjin stream was pumped into wetland systems. Water depth was maintained at 0.3-0.5 m and hydraulic retention time was managed to about 2-5 days; emergent plants were allowed to grow in the wetland. The wetland effluent concentrations of $BOD_5$, TSS, and T-N were higher in winter than in the growing season excepting the T-P, and effluent $BOD_5$ concentration was higher than influents in winter. Mass retention of T-N and T-P was stable throughout the year, whereas mass retention of $BOD_5$ and TSS was decreased in winter. $BOD_5$, TSS, T-N, and T-P performance of the experi-mental system was compared with the existing database (North American Treatment Wetland Database), and was within the range of general system performance. From the first-order analysis, T-P was virtually not temperature dependent, and $BOD_5$ and TSS were more temperature dependent than T-N. Overall, the wetland system was found to be an adequate alternative for treating polluted stream water with stable removal efficiency and recommended as a NPS control measures.
 
Ű¿öµå
constructed wetland;seasonal performance;NADB;first-order model;mass retention;
 
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.39, no.4, 2006³â, pp.471-480
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200618317187787)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿