¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.40, no.1, 2007³â, pp.130-142
¿ë´ã´ï °Ç¼³ÈÄ ÇÏ·ùºÎ ÇÏõ »ýŰèÀÇ Å¹¼ö¿µÇâ Æò°¡
( Ecological Health Assessments on Turbidwater in the Downstream After a Construction of Yongdam Dam )
±èÀÚÇö;¼­Áø¿ø;³ª¿µ¾ð;¾È±¤±¹; Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇкÎ;Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿ø°ø»ç ¼öÀÚ¿ø¿¬±¸¿ø;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ý¹°°øÇבּ¸¼Ò;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¿ë´ã´ïÀÇ Å¹¼ö ¹æ·ù·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÇÏ·ù ÇÏõÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÏ¿© »ýÅÂ°è °Ç°­¼º Æò°¡ ¸ðµ¨, ¹°¸®Àû ¼­½ÄÁö Æò°¡ ¸ðµ¨, ÇØºÎÇÐÀû °Ç°­¼º Æò°¡ ¸ðµ¨À» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. °Ç°­¼º Æò°¡ °á°ú $S1{sim}S4$ÀÇ »ýÅÂ°è °Ç°­µµ´Â Æò±Õ 43À¸·Î ÃÖÀû${sim}$ ¾çÈ£ »óÅ¿´°í, ¹°¸®Àû ¼­½ÄÁö °Ç°­µµ´Â Æò±Õ 154·Î ¾çÈ£»óÅ·Π³ªÅ¸³ª °Ç°­µµ°¡ ¾çÈ£ÇÏ°Ô À¯ÁöµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇÑÆí °³Ã¼ÀÇ °Ç°­µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â ÇØºÎÇÐÀû °Ç°­µµ Æò°¡ °á°ú 10°³ ¸ÞÆ®¸¯¿¡¼­ ÀÌ»óÁõ»óÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾Æ ¾î·ù °Ç°­¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µÇâÀº ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ºÎÀ¯¹°ÀÇ Áõ°¡¿¡ µû¸¥ ¾î·ù ¾Æ°¡¹ÌÀÇ ÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æÀû ¿µÇ⠺м®À» À§ÇØ Å¹µµ 󸮱º ¹× ´ëÁ¶±ºÀÇ ºñ±³ºÐ¼® °á°ú¿¡ µû¸£¸é, ¾î·ù ¾Æ°¡¹Ì¿¡¼­ ¸¹Àº ºÎÀ¯¹° ¹Ì¼¼ ÀÔÀÚ°¡ °üÂûµÇ¾î °íʵµ¿¡ Àå±â°£ ³ëÃâµÉ °æ¿ì °Ç°­¼º¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ʵµ Áõ°¡¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÎÀ¯»ç À̵¿¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¾î·ùÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû ¼­½ÄÁö ¿µÇ⠺м®(ƯÈ÷, ÇÏ»ó ¸Å¸ôµµ ¹× ÇÏ»óÆ¯¼º ºÐ¼®)À» À§ÇØ ¼­½ÄÁö °Ç°­¼º Æò°¡¸ðµ¨À» Àû¿ë Æò°¡ÇÑ °á°ú¿¡ µû¸£¸é, ´ë»ó Á¶»çÁö¿ª$(S1{sim}S4)$ÀÌ ´ëÁ¶±º Áö¿ª(C1, C2)º¸´Ù ´õ ÁÁÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Áï, ºÎÀ¯»çÀÇ Áõ°¡´Â ÇöÀçÀÇ °á°ú·Î´Â ¼­½ÄÁö °Ç°­µµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖÁö ¾Ê´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª ¾î·ùÀÇ ¸ÔÀ̻罽, »ê¶õÀå ¹× ¼­½Äó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÎÁ¤Àû ¿µÇâÀº ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ÀÌ·± °á°ú´Â ´Ü±â°£ ¿¬±¸ °á°ú¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇöÀç »óÅÂÀÇ °Ç°­µµ Æò°¡ÀÇ °á°úÀÌÁö¸¸ ÇâÈÄ Å¹¼ö°¡ Áö¼ÓµÉ °æ¿ì ¼ö ȯ°æÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô º¯ÇÒ °ÍÀΰ¡¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â »çÈÄ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ®¾ß Çϸç, ÇâÈÄ $3{sim}5$³â ÈÄÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÒ °æ¿ì ¿ë´ã´ï °Ç¼³¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ »ýÅ °Ç°­µµ°¡ ¾î¶»°Ô º¯ÇÒ °ÍÀÎÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÈ´Ù. ºÎ°¡ µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ´Â ¸ÖƼ¹Ìµð¾î ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» Æí¸®ÇÏ°Ô Á¦ÀÛÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, µ¥ÀÌÅͺ£À̽º·ÎºÎÅÍ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ¿µ»ó À̹ÌÁö¸¦ ÀÚÀ¯·Ó°Ô ÇÕ¼º, Á¶ÀÛÇÏ´Â µî, ¸Å¿ì ´Ù¾çÇÏ°í Æí¸®ÇÑ Á¦ÀÛ±â¹ýÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¸ÖƼ¹Ìµð¾î¸¦ ÀÀ¿ëÇÑ Á¦ÀÛ ºÐ¾ß·Î¼­ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ±×·¡ÇȽº ±â¼úÀº ¹æ¼ÛÀÇ »çÀüÁ¦ÀÛ¿¡ Ä¿´Ù¶õ ±â¿©¸¦ Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ¹Ì ¼±°Å¹æ¼ÛÀ» ºñ·ÔÇÑ ¿©·¯°¡Áö ÇÁ·Î±×·¥Àº °¡»ó½ºÆ©µð¿À¿Í °¡»óij¸¯ÅÍ ±â¼úÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© Á¦ÀÛÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ¹æ¼Û»ç¾÷ÀÚ´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¸ÖƼ¹Ìµð¾î Á¦À۽ýºÅÛÀ» ±Ù°£À¸·Î ¿µ»ó°Ë»ö, ¿µ»ó ÇÕ¼º, ½ºÅ©¸³Æ® ÆíÁý, °¡»óÇö½Ç ÀÀ¿ë µî °íµµÀÇ Á¦ÀÛ ±â¹ýÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÔÀ¸·Î½á »ç¿ëÀÚ Ä£È­¼º, ´ÙÀ̳ª¹ÍÇÑ Ç¥Çö, ½Ç½Ã°£, ´ëÈ­¼ºÀ» Ư¡À¸·Î ÇÏ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¸ÖƼ¹Ìµð¾î ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ ½ÃûÀÚ¿¡°Ô Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.is. Using the results, we can identify dominant overestimation sources that should be analyzed more accurately to get tighter WCET estimations. To make our method independent of any existing analysis techniques, we use simulation based methodology. We have implemented a MIPS R3000 simulator equipped with several switches, each of which determines the accuracy level of the timing analysis for the corresponding overestimation source. After repeating simulation for all of the switch combinations, we perform the variance analysis and study which factor has the largest impa
This study was to examine impacts of turbid water on fish community in the downstream of Yongdam Dam during the period from June to October 2006. For the research, we selected six sampling sites in the field: two sites were controls with no influences of turbid water from the dam and other remaining four sites were the stations for an assessment of potential turbid effects. We evaluated integrative health conditions throughout applications of various models such as necropsy-based fish health assessment model (FHA), Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) using fish assemblages, and Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI). Laboratory tests on fish exposure under 400 NTU were performed to find out impact of turbid water using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results showed that fine solid particles were clogging in the gill in the treatments, while particles were not found in the control. This results indicate that when inorganic turbidity increases abruptedly, fish may have a mechanical abrasion or respiratory blocking. The stream health condition, based on the IBI values, ranged between 38 and 48 (average: 42), indicating a "excellent" or "good" condition after the criteria of US EPA (1993). In the mean time, physical habitat condition, based on the QHEI, ranged 97 to 187 (average 154), indicating a "suboptimal condition". These biological outcomes were compared with chemical dataset: IBI values were more correlated (r=0.526, p<0.05, n=18) with QHEI rather than chemical water quality, based on turbidity (r=0.260, p>0.05, n=18). Analysis of the FHA showed that the individual health indicated "excellent condition", while QHEI showed no habitat disturbances (especially bottom substrate and embeddeness), food-web, and spawning place. Consequently, we concluded that the ecological health in downstream of Yongdam Dam was not impacted by the turbid water.
 
Ű¿öµå
turbid water;Yongdam Dam;health assessment;fish;ecological health;
 
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.40, no.1, 2007³â, pp.130-142
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200709905949358)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿