¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.39, no.1, 2006³â, pp.62-72
»ýÅ ÁöÇ¥Á¾À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÇØºÎÇÐÀû °Ç°­¼º Æò°¡Áö¼ö(HAI) Àû¿ëÀ» À§ÇÑ ¿¹ºñ½ÇÇè
( Preliminary Studies on the Necropsy-Based Health Assessment Index (HAI) Using a Ecological Indicator Species )
±èÀÚÇö;¹è´ë¿­;ÀÌÀ翬;¾È±¤±¹; Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇкÎ;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇкÎ;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇкÎ;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¼öȯ°æÀÇ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû °Ç°­µµ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ »ý¹°»óÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Æò°¡°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ® ¿ÔÀ¸¸ç ƯÈ÷, ¾î·ù´Â ¼öȯ°æÀÇ °Ç°­¼º Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ °¡Àå ÁÁÀº »ý¹°Á¾ ÁßÀÇ ÇϳªÀÌ´Ù. ÇØºÎÇÐÀû ±âÃÊ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °Ç°­¼º Æò°¡¹æ¹ýÀ» ½ÃµµÇÑ À̹ø ¿¹ºñ½ÇÇèÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ´ëÀü½Ã °©Ãµ¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇÑ ÇϼöÁ¾¸Ãó¸®ÀåÀÇ ¹æ·ù¼ö°¡ ¼öȯ°æÀÇ °Ç°­¼º¿¡ ¾î¶² ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´ÂÁö Æò°¡ÇØ º¸´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ºÐ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇØ ¾î·ùÀÇ Èä¼±(Thymus), Áö´À·¯¹Ì (Fins), Áö¶ó (Spleen), ÈÄÀå (Hindgut),½ÅÀå (Kidney), ÇǺΠ(Skin), °£ (Liver), ´« (Eyes), ¾Æ°¡¹Ì(Gill), ¹× Çê¾Æ°¡¹Ì (Pseudobranch)ÀÇ ÇØºÎÇÐÀûÀÎ 10°³ ¸ÞÆ®¸¯À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢°¢ 2°³ÀÇ ´ëÁ¶±º(control)°ú 󸮱º (Treatment)À¸·Î ½ÇÇè¿ë ¼öÁ¶¸¦ ºÐ¸®ÇÏ¿©, 󸮱º¿¡´Â ÇϼöÁ¾¸»Ã³¸®ÀåÀÇ ¹æ·ù¼ö¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´°í ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡´Â ÀÚ¿¬¼ö¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢°¢ÀÇ ¼öÁ¶¿¡ ¹öµéÄ¡ (Rhynchocypris oxycephalus)¸¦ 5°³Ã¼ ¾¿ Åõ¿©ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Åõ¿©ÇÑ ¹öµéÄ¡´Â ÇØºÎÇÐÀû Ãø¸éÀÇ °üÂûÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´°í, ÀÌÈÄ Ã³¸®±ºÀÇ Á×Àº ¹öµéÄ¡¿Í ´ëÁ¶±ºÀÇ °³Ã¼¸¦ °¢°¢ ÇØºÎÇϰí 10°³ ±â°üºÎÀ§¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© HAI °Ç°­µµÁö¼ö¸¦ »êÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇØºÎÇÏÀû ºÐ¼®°á°ú¿¡ µû¸£¸é, 3°³ÀÇ ´ëÁ¶±ºÀÇ HAIÁö¼ö´Â 0À¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª ÃÖÀû»óÅ·ΠÆÇ¸íµÇ¾ú°í, 4 ´ëÁ¶±ºÀº 40 ${sim}$ 150Á¡À¸·Î¼­ ¸ðµÎ ¾ÇÈ­»óÅ·Π³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, »ý¹°ÅëÇÕÁö¼ö ºÐ¼®, Á¾Ç³ºÎµµºÐ¼®, ³»¼ºµµ ¹× Æ®·ÎÇȱæµå ºÐ¼®¿¡ ÀǰÅÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ °Ç°­µµ ºÐ¼®Àº HAI ºÐ¼®°á°ú¸¦ ÁöÁöÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» HAI ±â¹ýÀº ÇöÀç ±¹³»¿¡¼­´Â Àû¿ë Æò°¡µÈ¹Ù ¾ø¾î, ±âÁ¸ÀÇ À¯¼ö»ýŰèÀÇ °Ç°­µµ Æò°¡¿¡ »óÈ£º¸¿ÏÀûÁö¼ö·ÎÀÇ È°¿ëµµ °¡´ÉÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.´çÈ£ÀÇ ¹°Áú ¼öÁö¿Í ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú ÆÈ´çÈ£¿¡¼­ ´ëÇü¼ö»ý½Ä¹°¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ 1Â÷»ý»ê·® ¹× ¹°Áú Èí¼ö·®Àº Àüü1Â÷»ý»ê·® ¹× À¯ÀÔ·®¿¡ ºñÇØ ¹Ì¹ÌÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù.ÀÌ´Ù.¿ø¿¡¼­ ¿ÀÆó¼ö󸮸¦ ÅëÇØ ÇÏõ ¼öÁúÀÌ ÈÞ¾ç¿ë¼ö·Î¼­ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â µ¥¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇϵµ·Ï ÃæºÐÇÑ Â÷Áý½Ã¼³°ú ȯ°æ ±âÃʽü³ÀÇ ¼³Ä¡ ¿î¿µÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.TEX>$K_s$°ªÀÌ ³ô°í $V_m/K_s$ºñÀ²Àº ³·¾Æ ¼ö°Ô¿¡¼­ Áú¼Ò°¡ Àú³óµµ ÀÏ ¶§¿¡´Â ´Ù¸¥ ¹Ì¼¼Á¶·ù¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¸é °æÀï·ÂÀÌ ¶³¾îÁö°í Áú¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âÁú ģȭ·ÂÀº ¾àÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ³«µ¿°­ ÇÏ·ùÁö¿ª¿¡¼­ M. aeruginosa°¡ ´ë¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ½Ã±â¿¡ ¼öÁß ¿µ¾ç¿°ÀÇ ³óµµ º¯µ¿Àº M. aeruginosaÀÇ ¿µ¾ç»ý¸® kinetics Ư¼º°ú Àß ºÎÇÕÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.ºÎºÐÀ» º¸¿ÏÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ®¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ. ¿¬¸¶¹æ¹ý °£¿¡ »óÈ£ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. FE-SEM°üÂû¿¡¼­ ·¹ÁøÀü»öÁ¦¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÑ ÈÄÀÇ Ç¥¸éÀº ¸ðµç ±º¿¡¼­ ´ëüÀûÀ¸·Î ÆòȰÇÑ Ç¥¸éÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. 4. µ¿ÀÏÇÑ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø°ú ¿¬¸¶¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ó¸®µÈ ±º¿¡¼­ ·¹ÁøÀü»öÁ¦ Àû¿ë Àü°ú ÈÄÀÇ Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ °ªÀº M1B±ºÀÌ M1±ºº¸´Ù, S1B±ºÀÌ S1±ºº¸´Ù Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, M4B±º°ú M5B±ºÀº °¢°¢ M4±º°ú M5±º º¸´Ù. ±×¸®°í S5B±ºÀº S5±º º¸´Ù Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù (p<0.05). º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿© º¸¸é, º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¶ó Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµÀÇ ¼ø¼­´Â ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, polyester strip ÇÏ¿¡¼­ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÌ ÁßÇÕµÈ °æ¿ì °¡Àå ³·Àº Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ °ª°ú ÆòȰÇÑ Ç¥¸éÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î anishing bur´Â °¡Àå ³ôÀº Ra°ª°ú °ÅÄ£ Ç¥¸éÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ¿´´Ù. Enhance, Astropol, carbide finishing bur·Î ¿¬¸¶ÇÑ Ç¥¸éÀº ·¹ÁøÀü»öÁ¦ÀÇ
Biological health in aquatic environments has been assessed by several approaches using various bio-taxa. Especially, fish has been identified as one of the best ecological indicators for an integrative health assessments in aquatic environments. In this preliminary study, the necropsy-based approach using the Health Assessment Index (Adams et al., 1993; HAI, Blazer, 2000), was employed for the assessments of aquatic environments influenced by effluent water from wastewater disposal plants (WDP) near a urban stream (i.e., Cap-Stream). For the impact analysis from the effluents, we developed 10 metric necropsy-based model including $M_l;skin,;M_2;fin,;M_3;thymus,;M_4;spleen,;M_5;hindgut,;M_6;kidney,;M_7;liver.;M_8;eyes,;M_9;gill,;and;M_{10}$ pseudobranch. We set up duplicate controls (natural upstream water plus 5 fishes in each control tank) and duplicate treatments (effluent water from the WDP plus 5 fishes in each treatment tank) in the laboratory. Preliminary results showed that HAI values in the controls were zero, indicating an excellent condition by the criteria of HAI, while the HAI values in the treatments ranged between 40 and 150, indicating a poor condition. Also, various health conditions, based on the index of biological integrity (IBI), species richness, tolerance guilds, and trophic guilds supported the HAI approach. The HAI approach, not applied in Korea, not may be used as an surrogate fer ecological health assessment in lotic ecosystems.
 
Ű¿öµå
health assessment index;necropsy;treatment;fish organ;pollution;
 
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.39, no.1, 2006³â, pp.62-72
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200618317186435)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿