¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.43, no.1, 2010³â, pp.35-43
¿µ»êÈ£ ½Ä¹°Çöûũſ º¯µ¿¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µ¾ç¿°°ú ±¤ Á¦ÇÑÀÇ »ó´ëÀû Æò°¡
( Assessment of Nutrient and Light Limitation of Phytoplankton in the Youngsan Lake )
¼ÛÀº¼÷;½Å¿ë½Ä;Àå³²ÀÍ;ÀÌÁعè; ¸ñÆ÷ÇØ¾ç´ëÇб³ ¿¬¾ÈÇϱ¸¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ;¸ñÆ÷ÇØ¾ç´ëÇб³ ÇØ¾ç½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇкÎ;±¹¸³È¯°æ°úÇпø ¿µ»ê°­¹°È¯°æ¿¬±¸¼Ò;±¹¸³È¯°æ°úÇпø ¿µ»ê°­¹°È¯°æ¿¬±¸¼Ò;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
´ã¼öÈ£ÀÎ ¿µ»êÈ£ÀÇ ½Ä¹°Çöûũſ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±¤ Á¦ÇѰú ¿µ¾ç¿° Á¦ÇÑÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϱâ À§ÇØ 2003³â 3¿ùºÎÅÍ 2004³â 4¿ù±îÁö (11¿ù~12¿ùÁ¦¿Ü) ¿ùº°Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇöûũſÀÇ Å©±â¸¦ ´ëÇü (net-size)°ú ¼ÒÇü (nano-size)À¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ÄݷηÎÇÊ, pheopigment ratio¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í ¹°¸®È­ÇÐÀû ȯ°æÆ¯¼ºÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ±¤ Á¦ÇÑ Áö¼ö¿Í ¿µ¾ç¿° Á¦ÇÑ Áö¼ö¸¦ »êÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇØ ±âÁ¸ ¹®ÇåÀÇ ¼ö½ÄÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½Ä¹°ÇöûũſÀº ´ëÇü°ú ¼ÒÇü ¸ðµÎ dz¼ö±â ƯÈ÷ 8¿ù¿¡´Â ³·Àº ÇöÁ¸·®À» º¸¿´°í ³ª¸ÓÁö °èÀý¿¡ °£ÇæÀûÀ¸·Î ÇöÁ¸·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â ÇüŸ¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ÀÏÁ¶½Ã°£Àº dz¼ö±â¿¡ ª¾Ò°í °¥¼ö±â¿¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í, ¿µ¾ç¿° ƯÈ÷ Àλ꿰°ú ¾Ï¸ð´Ï¾Æ´Â 2004³â º½Ã¶¿¡ »ó´ç Æø Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¤ Á¦ÇÑ 8¿ù¿¡ ÃÖ¼Ò°ª(0.01)À» ±â·ÏÇÏ¿´°í, ¿µ¾ç¿° Á¦ÇÑ Áö¼ö´Â 5¿ù°ú 9¿ùÀ» Á¦¿ÜÇÏ°í ´Ù¼Ò ³ôÀº Áö¼ö(>0.4)¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ¿µ»êÈ£´Â Àΰï È£¼Òµéº¸´Ù ¿µ¾ç¿° ³óµµ°¡ ³ôÀº Á¡À» °í·ÁÇßÀ» ¶§, ¿µ¾ç¿° Á¦ÇѺ¸´Ù´Â ±¤ Á¦ÇÑÀÌ ½Ä¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ ¼ºÀå¿¡ ´õ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. °ø°£ÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ±¤ Á¦ÇÑ Áö¼ö´Â ÇÏ·ù·Î °¥¼ö·Ï Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´Áö¸¸ ¿µ¾ç¿° Á¦ÇÑ Áö¼ö´Â Å« º¯µ¿À» º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. »ó°ü¼º ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­ net-pheopigment index´Â ±¤ Á¦ÇÑ Áö¼ö ¹× ¿µ¾ç¿° Á¦ÇÑ Áö¼ö¿Í À½ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è, nano-pheopigments index´Â Á¦ÇÑ Áö¼öµé°ú ¾çÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿© ȯ°æ¾ÇÈ­·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¿µÇâÀÌ ½Ä¹°ÇöûũſÀÇ Å©±âº°·Î »óÀÌÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³¯ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °¡´É¼ºÀ» º¸¿©ÁØ´Ù.
Nutrient limitation and light limitation was examined for the Youngsan Lake by collecting chlorophyll $alpha$ and other properties including light intensity, nutrient concentrations, pheopigment ratio monthly from March, 2003 to April, 2004 (except for November-January). Chlorophyll $alpha$ was fractionated into net-(>$20;{mu}m$) and nano-size(<$20;{mu}$). Light and nutrient limitation index was calculated based on the equations incorporating the mechanisms of limitation of light and nutrients from the literature. Phytoplankton population (chlorophyll $alpha$) was low during the wet season especially in August and increased in short-period during other seasons. Photoperiod was short during the wet season but long during the dry season. Nutrients such as phosphate and ammonium were rapidly increased in spring, 2004. Light limitation index was minimum (0.01) in August during the wet season and nutrient limitation index was relatively high (>0.4) except for May and September. Light limitation may affect phytoplankton growth rather than nutrient limitation considering that nutrient levels are high in the Youngsan Lake. Results of correlation analyses showed a negative correlation between light and nutrient limitation indices and net-pheopigment index, and a positive correlation between the indices and nano-pheopigment index. These results suggest that phytoplankton response to change of light and nutrient may be size-dependant.
 
Ű¿öµå
Youngsan Lake;phytoplankton;light limitation index;nutrient limitation index;
 
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.43, no.1, 2010³â, pp.35-43
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201023064630344)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿