¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ / v.43, no.3, 2010³â, pp.437-450
´ã¼ö ÀÌ¸ÅÆÐ ¸»Á¶°³°¡ ºÎ¿µ¾ç ÇÏõÀÇ ¼öÁú ¹× ºÎÂøÁ¶·ù ±ºÁý¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Influences of Freshwater Bivalve Unio douglasiae on the Water Quality and Periphyton Community in Artificial Eutrophic Streams )
¹Úäȫ;ÀÌÁÖȯ;Ȳ¼øÁø;±è¹éÈ£; °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ý¸íȯ°æ°úÇдëÇРȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ý¸íȯ°æ°úÇдëÇРȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ý¸íȯ°æ°úÇдëÇРȯ°æ°úÇаú;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ »ý¸íȯ°æ°úÇдëÇРȯ°æ°úÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
±¹³»»ê ÀÌ¸ÅÆÐ ¸»Á¶°³°¡ ÇÏõÀÇ ¼öÁú ¹× ºÎÂøÁ¶·ù ¼ºÀå¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â »ýÅÂÇÐÀû ¿µÇâÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Á¦ÀÛÇÑ Àΰø¼ö·Î¿¡ ºÎÂø±âÁúÀ» ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ°í ÆÐ·ù¸¦ µµÀÔÇÑ ´ÙÀ½ 10ÀÏ µ¿¾È ¼öÁú ¹× Á¶·ù ÇöÁ¸·® º¯È­¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àΰø¼ö·Î´Â ¾ÆÅ©¸± ÀçÁú·Î À¯¼ÓÇü¼ºÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© °è´Ü½ÄÀ¸·Î Á¦ÀÛÇÏ°í ºÎ¿µ¾çÈ£ Ç¥Ãþ¼ö¸¦ À¯ÀÔÇÏ¿© ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ À¯¼ÓÀ¸·Î Åë°ú½ÃÄ×´Ù. ºÎÂøÁ¶·ù ±âÁú·Î »ó¿ë ½½¶óÀ̵å±Û¶ó½º¸¦ ÆÐ·ùµµÀÔ 1ÁÖÀÏ Àü¿¡ °¢ °è´Ü¿¡ 40°³¾¿ ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÆÐ·ù´Â 435 ind. $m^{-2}$·Î µµÀÔÇϰí 10Àϰ£ ¸ÅÀÏ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ½Ã°£¿¡ ¼ö¿Â, pH, Àü±âÀüµµµµ, ¿ëÁ¸»ê¼Ò, ʵµ, ±¤µµ, ¿µ¾ç¿°, ±×¸®°í ±âö ¹× ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ SS, Chl-$alpha$, Á¶·ù ÇöÁ¸·® µîÀ» °¢°¢ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸»Á¶°³ 󸮴 ¼öÁ¾ ʵµ(60%), SS(62.5%), Chl-$alpha$(72.2%), TP(23.9%), ¿ëÁ¸»ê¼Ò(19.5%) ³óµµ¸¦ °¨¼Ò½ÃŲ ¹Ý¸é, ¾Ï¸ð´Ï¾Æ ³óµµ´Â Áõ°¡½ÃÄ×´Ù. ÆÐ·ù󸮱ºÀÇ ±âÁú SS(67%)¿Í Chl-$alpha$(89.4%)´Â ¶Ñ·ÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÑ ¹Ý¸é ¼öÁßÀÇ Á¶·ù ÇöÁ¸·®Àº ¶Ñ·ÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. °á±¹ ÇÏõÀÇ ÆÐ·ù´Â ¼öÁß À¯±â¹°ÀÇ È¿°úÀûÀÎ Àú°¨À» ÅëÇÏ¿© Åõ¸íµµ °³¼±À» À¯µµÇÏ°í µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¹èÃâµÈ ¿µ¾ç¿° ¹× ¹è¼³¹°Àº ºÎÂø Á¶·ù ¼ºÀåÀ» ÃËÁøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù.
Ecological influences of indigenous freshwater bivalve Unio douglasiae on the water quality and epilithic diatom community was examined with artificial stream (AST), which constructed in a laboratory daily receiving the eutrophic lake water. For the colonization of new periphyton community, forty commercial slide glasses were deposited as a substrate into the lowest part of each AST. Prior to 1 week, the AST was operated to induce the freely-colonization of the algal community in the absence of mussels. After the mussels was introduced at 435 indiv. $m^{-2}$ between step 1 and step 5, the passed water and substrates were daily collected to analysis the change of water quality and lotic and lentic algae abundance for 10 days. Compared to the control, turbidity (60.0% of control), suspended solids (62.5%), and chlorophyll-$alpha$ (72.2%) in mussel-passed waters were decreased significantly, while a strong increase of ammonia (up to 800% of control) was companied with the decrease of dissolved oxygen (19.5% of control) and total phosphorus (23.9%), respectively. On average, the concentrations of suspended solids (67.0% of control) and chlorophyll-$alpha$ (89.4%) in mussel-treated substrates were remarkably increased, however algal abundance in its water simultaneously decreased. These results indicate that incidentally or purposely mussel introductions can decrease organic matter of the stream and increase transparency of stream water, however, mussel-mediated nutrient and pseudofeces release may stimulate the adverse growth of periphyton or phytoplankton community in the lower stream or reservoir.
 
Ű¿öµå
artificial stream;freshwater bivalves;Unio douglasiae;nutrient release;periphyton community;immobilized substrate;
 
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸÁö / v.43, no.3, 2010³â, pp.437-450
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1976-8087
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201009654402840)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿