¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ / v.27, no.1, 2009³â, pp.31-39
³ó¾÷»ýÅÂ°è ±òµû±¸ À¯ÃæÀÇ ´Ù¾ç¼º ¹× ¿ìÁ¡Á¾ ´ÕÆù±òµû±¸¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ À¯±â¹° ºÐÇØ´É Æò°¡
( Species Diversity of Chironomid Midge and Evaluation on Removal Capacity of Organic Matter Using a Dominant Species, Chironomus nipponensis in Agroecosystem )
½ÉÇϽÄ;¹Úº´µµ;ÀÌ¿µº¸;ÃÖ¿µÃ¶;±èÁ¾±æ;¹ÚÇØÃ¶; ±¹¸³½Ä·®°úÇпø ±â´É¼ºÀÛ¹°ºÎ µÎ·ùÀ¯ÁöÀÛ¹°°ú;±¹¸³³ó¾÷°úÇпø ³ó¾÷»ý¹°ºÎ °ïÃæ»ê¾÷°ú;±¹¸³³ó¾÷°úÇпø ³ó¾÷»ý¹°ºÎ °ïÃæ»ê¾÷°ú;±¹¸³³ó¾÷°úÇпø ³ó¾÷»ý¹°ºÎ °ïÃæ»ê¾÷°ú;±¹¸³³ó¾÷°úÇпø ³ó¾÷»ý¹°ºÎ °ïÃæ»ê¾÷°ú;±¹¸³³ó¾÷°úÇпø ³ó¾÷»ý¹°ºÎ °ïÃæ»ê¾÷°ú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
³ó¾÷»ýŰèÀÇ È¯°æº°·Î ±òµû±¸·ùÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¸¦ ¹àÈ÷°í ¿ìÁ¡Á¾À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ À¯±â¹° ºÐÇØ´ÉÀ» Æò°¡ÇϰíÀÚ ´ë´ÜÀ§°æÀÛÁö, ģȯ°æ³ó¾÷Áö, »ýȰÇϼö À¯ÀÔÁö, Ãà»êÆó¼ö À¯ÀÔÁö ¹× ÁÖº¯¼ö·Î µîÀÇ 5°³ ¼­½Äóº°·Î ³ª´©¾î '04$sim$'06³â±îÁö °¢ ±¸È¹À» ´ëÇ¥ÇÏ´Â ÃÑ 78°³ ÁöÁ¡¿¡¼­ ±òµû±¸°ú ¹× °ø¼­ ¹«Ã´Ãßµ¿¹°À» Á¤·® äÁýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ³ó¾÷Áö´ëÀÇ ±òµû±¸·ù´Â ÃÑ 16Á¾À¸·Î µ¿Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼­½ÄÁö À¯Çüº°·Î ÃâÇöÇÑ Á¾¼ö¸¦ º¸¸é, Ãà»êÆó¼ö À¯ÀÔÁö¿¡¼­ 11Á¾, ´ë´ÜÀ§ ³ó°æÁö´Â 8Á¾, ³ó°æÁö ÁÖº¯¼ö·Î´Â 7Á¾, ģȯ°æ³ó¾÷Áö´Â 6Á¾, »ýȰÇϼö À¯ÀÔÁö´Â 2Á¾À¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù ±¸È¹º°·Î ³ªÅ¸³­ ¿ìÁ¡Á¾À» º¸¸é, À¯±â¹°ÀÇ ³óµµ°¡ ³ôÀº ´ë´ÜÀ§°æÀÛÁö(A), »ýȰÇϼö À¯ÀÔÁö(C) ¹× Ãà»êÆó¼ö À¯ÀÔÁö(D)¿¡¼­´Â ´ÕÆù±òµû±¸(C. nipponensis), À¯±â¹° ÇÔ·®ÀÌ ³·Àº ÁÖº¯¼ö·Î(E)¿¡¼­´Â ½£¾Æ±â±òµû±¸(C. sylvestris), ģȯ°æ³ó¾÷Áö(B)¿¡¼­´Â ¼­»êÀåºÎ±òµû±¸(Tanytarsus sesanensis)¿´´Ù. ¼öÁú°ú ±ºÁýÁö¼ö´Â ³íÁÖº¯ÀÇ ¼ö·Î¿¡¼­ ³ô¾Ò°í, ´ë´ÜÀ§ °æÀÛÁö, ģȯ°æ³ó¾÷Áö, »ýȰÇϼö À¯ÀÔÁö, Ãà»êÆó¼ö À¯ÀÔÁö´Â ³·Àº ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀúÁú³»¿¡¼­ ´ÕÆù±òµû±¸ÀÇ À¯±â¹° Á¦°Å´É·ÂÀº ¹«Ã³¸®±¸¿Í ´ëºñÇÏ¿© 90°³Ã¼ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ 18% Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
To recognize the species composition and community of chironomid midge in agroecosystem and evaluate removal capacity of organic matter using the dominant species among them. Chironomid midge and invertebrate cohabitants were quantitatively collected at 78 representative stations of five habitat types (in arable land during 2004$sim$2006) A, paddy fields of the large scale arable land; B, paddy fields of the environmental friendly arable land; C, influent of domestic waste water; D, influent of waste water by livestock; E, the irrigation ditch of paddy area. The total sixteen species of chironomid midges at arable land were presented. And also chironomid midges were recognized by five habitat types: eleven species in D, eight in A, seven in E, six in B, and two in C. We confirmed dominant species in each habitat types as followings: Chironomus nipponensis in A, C, and D; Cricotopus sylvestris in E; Tanytarsus seosanensis in B. Water quality and community index were high in E, but low in A, B, C, and D. Comparing with non-treatment, removal activities of organic matter in bottom by C. nipponensis were increased 18% in 90 individuals treatment.
 
Ű¿öµå
diversity;removal capacity;organic matter;chironomid midge;Chironomus nipponensis;agroecosystem;
 
ȯ°æ»ý¹° / v.27, no.1, 2009³â, pp.31-39
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-9999
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200920258463362)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿