¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ / v.17, no.2, 1999³â, pp.147-152
È­Çй°ÁúÀÇ »ýºÐÇØ¼º ÃøÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ OECD ½ÃÇè¹ýÀÇ Æò°¡
( Evaluation of the OECD Biodegradability Tests for Chemicals )
±èÇϰ­;±è±Õ;±è¿ëÈ­;ÀÌ¿µÇÏ; Çѱ¹È­Çבּ¸¼Ò ¾ÈÀü¼º¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ È¯°æµ¶¼ºÆÀ;Çѱ¹È­Çבּ¸¼Ò ¾ÈÀü¼º¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ È¯°æµ¶¼ºÆÀ;Çѱ¹È­Çבּ¸¼Ò ¾ÈÀü¼º¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ È¯°æµ¶¼ºÆÀ;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ ¹Ì»ý¹°Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ÇöÀç ±¹³»¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â À̺ÐÇØ¼º ¹Ì»ý¹° ºÐÇØ¼º ½ÃÇè¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡À» Á¦½ÃÇϰí À̸¦ ÇØ°áÇϰųª º¸¿ÏÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇϰíÀÚ, OECDÁöħ¼­¿¡ µîÀçµÈ 6°¡Áö À̺ÐÇØ¼º ½ÃÇè¹æ¹ý Áß ½ÃÇè¹°ÁúÀÇ ¼±Á¤¿¡ Á¦ÇÑÀÌ ¾ø´Â MITI(I), manometric respirometry, closed bottle test¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© 8°³ È­Çй°ÁúÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ºñ±³½ÃÇè ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇöÀç ±¹³»¿¡¼­´Â MITI(I)¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇϰí Àִµ¥ ÀÌ ¹æ¹ýÀº Á¢Á¾¹Ì»ý¹°ÀÇ Áغñ°úÁ¤°ú ¹è¾çÀ¯Áö¿¡ ¸¹Àº ½Ã°£°ú ºñ¿ëÀ» ¿ä±¸Çϸç, ¹è¾ç°úÁ¤À» ÅëÇØ ¹Ì»ý¹°ÀÇ Á¾ÀÌ ´Ü¼øÈ­µÇ´Â ´ÜÁ¡À» Áö´Ï°í ÀÖ´Ù. Á¢Á¾ ¹Ì»ý¹°ÀÇ Ã¤Ãë¿Í È­Çй°ÁúÀÇ ¼±Åÿ¡ Á¦ÇÑÀÌ ¾ø´Â »õ·Î¿î ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î´Â manometric respirometry¹ýÀ» µé ¼ö°¡ Àִµ¥, ½ÃÇè¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¿ëÀ̼º°ú °æÁ¦¼º, ÀçÇö¼º µîÀ» ¸ðµÎ °í·ÁÇÒ ¶§ °¡Àå ÀûÇÕÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀ̶ó°í »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
The efficiency of the OECD MITI(I) test which is designated as a standard method for measuring the biodegradability of chemicals by the Korean Ministry of Environment was evaluated and compared with those of two other OECD ready biodegradability tests£º the manometric respirometry test and the closed bottle test. All the tests were applicable to a wide variety of organic chemicals and there were no significant differences in biodegradation rates of eight test chemicals and a reference chemical with three methods. However, the MITI(I) test had unnecessary expense and complexity in preparation of a mixed inoculum. Decrease in bacterial diversity during pre-conditioning of the inoculum for 1 month was observed and therefore the mixed inoculum did not ensure the presence of a variety of species in the test. Based on the simplicity, cost-effectiveness and reproducibility of the test procedure, it is considered that the manometric respirometry test is the most adequate method which can replace the MITI(I) test method.
 
Ű¿öµå
MITI(I) test;Manometric respirometry test;Closed bottle test;
 
ȯ°æ»ý¹° / v.17, no.2, 1999³â, pp.147-152
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-9999
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199911921494630)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿