¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ / v.26, no.3, 2008³â, pp.159-169
¾Ï¹ÝÁ¶°£´ë ´ëÇüÀú¼­µ¿¹°±ºÁý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾¾ÇÁ¸°½ºÈ£ À¯·ù À¯Ãâ»ç°í ¿µÇâ Æò°¡
( Assessment of the Impacts of 'Sea Prince' Oil Spill on the Rocky Intertidal Macrobenthos Community )
½ÅÇöÃâ;ÀÌÁ¤È£;ÀÓ°æÈÆ;À±¼º¸í;°íöȯ; Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÇØ¾ç±â¼úÇкÎ;Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÇØ¾ç±â¼úÇкÎ;Çѱ¹³óÃ̰ø»ç ³ó¾îÃÌ¿¬±¸¿ø;Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ÇØ¾ç»ý¸í°úÇаú;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Áö±¸È¯°æ°úÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¾Æ¶óºñ¾È ¿øÀ¯ 86,886.2Åæ ÀÌ»óÀ» ¼±ÀûÇÑ À¯Á¶¼± Sea PrinceÈ£´Â ÅÂdz ÆäÀ̸¦ ÇÇÇÏ´Ù°¡ 1995³â 7¿ù 23ÀÏ ¼Ò¸®µµ ÀÎ±Ù ÇØ¾È¿¡ ÁÂÃʵǾú´Ù. ÀÌÈÄ 4,155.3ÅæÀÇ ¿øÀ¯¿Í 979.9ÅæÀÇ ¿£Áø¿ÀÀÏ (º¡Å©C, º¡Å©A)ÀÌ À¯ÃâµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, À¯ÃâÀ¯´Â ÁÖ·Î ºÏµ¿¹æÇâÀ¸·Î È®»êµÇ¾î ¼Ò¸®µµ¿Í ³²Çصµ¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ¼ö¹éų·Î¹ÌÅÍÀÇ ÇØ¾ÈÀÌ ±â¸§À¸·Î µÚµ¤¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â Sea Prince À¯·ù À¯Ãâ »ç°í 2³â ÈÄ, À¯·ùÀÇ ¿µÇâÀÌ °¡Àå ½É°¢Çß´ø Áö¿ªºÎÅÍ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÞÁö ¾ÊÀº Áö¿ª±îÁö À¯·ù È®»ê °æ·Î¸¦ µû¶ó Á¶°£´ë ´ëÇüÀú¼­µ¿¹°±ºÁý¿¡ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÏ¿© ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÇöÀå Á¶»ç´Â »ç°í 2.5³â ÈÄÀÎ 1998³â 2¿ùºÎÅÍ 11¿ù±îÁö °èÀýº°·Î Sea Prince À¯ÃâÀ¯°¡ µÚµ¤ÀÎ ¿¬¾ÈÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 7°³ Áö¿ªÀÇ ¾Ï¹ÝÁ¶°£´ë¸¦ ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç±â°£ Áß 11°³ µ¿¹°¹®ÀÌ Ã¤ÁýµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª, ÀÌÁß ÇØÁ¶ ´ýºÒ¼Ó¿¡¼­ äÁýµÈ ´Ü°¢·ù¿Í µî°¢·ù µîÀÇ ÀϺΠÁ¾Àº ¹Ìµ¿Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. µ¿Á¤µÈ Á¾Àº ÃÑ 5¹® 9°­ 65°ú¿¡ ¼ÓÇÏ´Â 158Á¾ÀÌ´Ù. ¿¬Ã¼µ¿¹°ÀÌ 100Á¾(63.3%)À¸·Î °¡Àå ¸¹Àº Á¾ ¼ö°¡ äÁýµÇ¾ú°í, ´ÙÀ½Àº °©°¢·ù 38Á¾(24.1%), ±ØÇǵ¿¹° 12Á¾(7.6%), ÇØ¸éµ¿¹° 5Á¾(3.2%), ÀÚÆ÷µ¿¹° 3Á¾(1.9%)ÀÌ Ã¤ÁýµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼Ò¸®µµ ´öÆ÷(Sea Prince ÁÂÃÊ Áö¿ª)¿¡¼­ °èÀý¿¡ µû¶ó 28$sim$35Á¾À¸·Î °¡Àå ÃâÇöÁ¾¼ö°¡ Àû¾ú´Ù. ÃâÇöÁ¾¼ö´Â ´öÆ÷¿¡¼­ °¡¸·¸¸ÂÊÀ¸·Î °¡¸é¼­ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¼ÒȾ°£µµ¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ¼Ò¸®µµ ´öÆ÷¿¡¼­´Â ´Ù¸¥ Áö¿ª¿¡ ºñÇØ ÇØ¸éµ¿¹°À̳ª ÀÚÆ÷µ¿¹°°ú °°Àº ºÎÂøµ¿¹°ÀÇ Á¾ ¼ö°¡ ¸Å¿ì Àû¾ú´Ù. »óºÎÁ¶°£´ëÀÇ ¼­½Ä¹Ðµµ¿Í »ý¹°·®Àº À¯·ù ¿µÇâÀÌ ÀûÀº Áö¿ªÀ¸·Î °¥¼ö·Ï Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ÁߺÎÁ¶°£´ëÀÇ »ý¹°·®Àº ¿ÀÈ÷·Á °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»çÁö¿ªÀÇ ¹«Ã´Ãßµ¿¹° »ý¹°·®Àº ºÎÂøµ¿¹°ÀÇ ¾ç¿¡ Á¿ìµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÃÖ¿ìÁ¡Á¾Àº Á¶¹«·¡±âµû°³ºñ (Chthmallus challengeri), ÃѾ˰íµî(Littorina brecicula), ´ãÄ¡·ùÀ̾ú´Ù. »óºÎÁ¶°£´ëÀÇ Á¶¹«·¡±âµû°³ºñ¿Í ÃѾ˰íµîÀÇ »ý¹°·®Àº ¼Ò¸®µµÀÇ ÁÂÃÊÁö¿ª¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ °÷¿¡¼­ ¸Ö¾îÁú¼ö·Ï °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹Ý¸é¿¡ ÁߺÎÁ¶°£´ëÀÇ ´ãÄ¡·ù´Â ¹Ý´ëÀÇ °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Âµ¥, ÀÌ´Â ¼Ò¸®µµ ÁÂÃÊÁö¿ª¿¡¼­ ´ãÄ¡·ùÀÇ °³Ã¼Å©±â°¡ ´Ù¸¥ Áö¿ª¿¡ ºñÇØ Å©±â ¶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù. ±ºÁýºÐ¼® °á°ú·Î´Â À¯·ùÀÇ ¿µÇâÀÌ ¶Ñ·ÇÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. »ýÅÂÁö¼ö¿Í Áý±«ºÐ¼® °á°ú Á¶°í¿¡ µû¶ó¼­´Â ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌ´Â ¹Ý¸é¿¡ À¯·ù °æ·Î¿¡ µû¶ó¼­´Â ÀǹÌÀÖ´Â °á°ú¸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÀÌ´Â Sea Prince»ç°í ÀÌÈÄ À¯·ùÈ®»ê Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ ±ºÁý ¼öÁØ¿¡¼­´Â ¾î´À Á¤µµ ȸº¹µÇ¾úÀ½À» ÀǹÌÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ. ±×·¯³ª ¿ìÁ¡ ºÎÂøµ¿¹°ÀÇ °³Ã¼±ºÀ̳ª °³Ã¼ ¼öÁØ¿¡¼­´Â À¯·ù »ç°í ÀÌÈÄ È¸º¹¿¡ ´õ ¸¹Àº ½Ã°£ÀÌ °É¸²À» º¸¿©Áشٰí ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
This study was aimed to classify the intertidal macrozoobenthic community status after 2 years of Sea Prince oil spill, and oil spill effects along oil spreading track from heavily impacted to unaffected reference site. Field sampling was initiated in late February and continued through November 1998 seasonally, after 2.5 years of oil spill. 7 rocky sampling sites were selected among coastal regions coated and/or affected by the Sea Prince spilled oil. Identified species was 158 species, 65 family, 24 order, 9 class, 5 phylum. Mollusca was the dominant faunal group comprising 100 species (63.3%), and followed by 38 species of Crustacea (24.1%), 12 species of Echinodermata (7.6%), 5 species of Porifera (3.2%), and 3 species of Cnidaria (1.9%). On Dugpo of Sori Island, the fewest species was collected from 28 species to 35 species seasonally among sampling stations. But far away Dugpo toward Gamak Bay, the number of species increased, collecting the maximum on Sohwoenggan Island. At the wreck site of Sori Island, especially the species number of attached animals such as poriferans and anthozoans was very low compared to another site. The density and biomass on the higher tidal zone increased toward the low affected sites, but biomass on middle tidal zone decreased. The invertebrate biomass of study area was dependent on the sessile animals. The major dominant species were small-sized barnacles, Chthmallus challengeri, periwinkles, Littorina brevicula, mussels, Septifer virgatus, and so on. The biomass of C. challengeri and L. brevicula on the higher tidal zone was highest in the wreck site of Sori Island and decreased further and further. However, mussels on the middle tidal zone showed the inverse trends because of the larger individual size of mussel inhabited in Sori Island than those of another sites. As a result of community analysis, the effect of oil spill was not found distinctly. Several ecological indices and cluster analysis did not show the meaningful variation with oil track despite of the conspicuous differences among tidal heights. These indicate that the macrozoobenthic community level of oil spreaded zone recovered in some degree after the Sea Prince oil spill accident, but population or individual levels of dominant sessile animals took more recovery times.
 
Ű¿öµå
Sea Prince;oil spill;rocky shore;macrobenthos community;
 
ȯ°æ»ý¹° / v.26, no.3, 2008³â, pp.159-169
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1226-9999
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200820258465621)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿