¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.12, no.3, 1998³â, pp.259-270
¼Ò³ª¹«¿Í »ó¼ö¸®³ª¹«¸²ÀÇ ÀÓ³»¿ì ¹°¼öÁö Ư¼º
( Characteristics of Water Budget on Throughfall and Stemflow in Pinus densiflora and Quercus acutissima )
ÀÌÇåÈ£;¹ÚÀçö; ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬ÀÚ¿ø´ëÇÐ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;¿µ³²´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â »êÁöÀÇ ¼öÀÚ¿øº¸Àü·® Æò°¡¿ë ¼ö¹®À¯Ãâ¸ðÇüÀÇ °³¹ßÀ» À§ÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ±âÃÊ¿¬±¸·Î¼­ ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó ÁÖ¿ä ¼öÁ¾ÀÎ ¼Ò³ª¹«¿Í »ó¼ö¸®³ª¹«¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö°£·ù ¹× ¼ö°üÅë°ú¿ìÀÇ ¹°¼öÁö½Ä°ú ¼ö¹®ÇÐÀû Ư¼ºÀ» ¹àÈ÷°íÀÚ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬ÀÚ¿ø´ëÇÐ ºÎ¼Ó ¿ë¼º¿¬½À¸²°ú ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ ±³³» ¾ß»ê¿¡ °¢°¢ ¼ö°üÅë°ú¿ì ¹× ¼ö°£·ù °üÃø¿ë ¾ß¿Ü ½ÇÇèÁö¸¦ ¼³Ä¡Çϰí, 1995³â 9¿ù¿¡¼­ 1998³â 6¿ù±îÁö ¾à 2³â 10°³¿ù »çÀÌ¿¡ ÀÌ Áö¿ª¿¡ ³»¸° ´Ù¼öÀÇ ´ÜÀ§°­¿ì¿¡ ´ëÇÑ µÎ ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ ÀÓ³»¿ì ¼ö·®¹èºÐÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú ÀÓ¿ÜÀÇ ´ÜÀ§°­¿ì¿¡ ÀÀ´äÇÏ´Â µÎ ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ ¼ö¹®ÇÐÀû Ư¼º°ú ÀÓ³»¿ì ¹°¼öÁö½ÄÀ» ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. ¼Ò³ª¹«¿¡ À־ ¼ö°üÅë°ú¿ì¿Í ¼ö°£·ùÀÇ ÃÑ·®Àº °¢°¢ ÀÓ¿Ü¿ìÀÇ 73.8%¿Í 0.8%ÀÌ¿´À¸¸ç »ó¼ö¸®³ª¹«´Â °¢°¢ ÀÓ¿Ü¿ìÀÇ 76.9%¿Í 3.8%·Î °üÃøµÇ¾ú´Ù. 2. ¼Ò³ª¹«¿¡ À־ ÀÓ¿Ü¿ì(Gp)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö°£·ù(S$_{f}$)¿Í ¼ö°üÅë°ú¿ì(T$_{f}$)ÀÇ È¸±Í½ÄÀº °¢°¢ S$_{f}$ = 0.01GP -2.05 ($r^2$=0.54) T$_{f}$ = 0.79Gp - 26.04 ($r^2$=0.92)·Î, ÀÓ³»¿ì(N$_{r}$)¿Í´Â N$_{r}$ = 0.81Gp - 28.09 (r2=0.92)·Î ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°ÀÌ ¼Ò³ª¹«¿¡ À־ ¼ö°£·ù¿Í ¼ö°üÅë°ú¿ì´Â ÀÓ¿Ü¿ìÀÇ ¾ç¿¡ Á¤ºñ·ÊÇÏ¿© Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 3. »ó¼ö¸®³ª¹«¿¡ À־ ÀÓ¿Ü¿ì(Gp)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö°£·ù(S$_{f}$)¿Í ¼ö°üÅë°ú¿ì(T$_{f}$)ÀÇ È¸±Í½ÄÀº °¢°¢ S$_{f}$ = 0.03Gp + 12.25 ($r^2$=0.74) T$_{f}$ = 0.78Gp + 19.75 ($r^2$=0.96)·Î, ÀÓ³»¿ì(N$_{r}$)¿Í´Â N$_{r}$ = 0.81Gp + 31.99 ($r^2$=0.96)·Î ±¸ÇØÁ³´Âµ¥ ¼Ò³ª¹«º¸´Ù »ó¼ö¸®³ª¹«¿¡ À־ ¼ö°£·ù¿Í ¼ö°üÅë°ú¿ìÀÇ Áõ°¡ÆøÀÌ ´õ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 4. ¼ö°£·ù ¹× ¼ö°üÅë°ú¿ì¿Í ±× ¿µÇâÀÎÀÚ·Î Æò°¡µÈ ¼ö°üÅõ¿µ¸éÀû(CA). Èä°íÁ÷°æ(DBH), Àӿܿ췮(Gp)°úÀÇ ³»ºÎ»ó°üºÐ¼®À» ÇÑ °á°ú, ¼Ò³ª¹« ¼ö°£·ù¿¡´Â Àӿܿ죾¼ö°üÅõ¿µ¸éÀû£¾Èä°íÁ÷°æÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î, »ó¼ö¸®³ª¹« ¼ö°£·ù¿¡´Â Àӿܿ죾Èä°íÁ÷°æ£¾¼ö°üÅõ¿µ¸éÀûÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î »ó°ü°è¼ö °ªÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¼Ò³ª¹«¿Í »ó¼ö¸®³ª¹«ÀÇ ¼ö°üÅë°ú¿ì´Â Àӿܿ죾¼ö°üÅõ¿µ¸éÀû£¾Èä°íÁ÷°æÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î »ó°ü°è¼ö °ªÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù.»ó°ü°è¼ö °ªÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
This study, as an essential research to develope a mountainous runoff model, was conducted to clarify the hydrologic character and water budget equation of Pinus densiflora and Quercus acutissima. Net rainfall quantity division for two species was investigated at Youngsung experiment forest and Yeungnam University for 30 months(Sep. 1995-Jun. 1998). The results were summarized as follows; 1. The percentages of throughfall and stemflow to gross precipitation are 73.8% and 0.8% in the Pinus densiflora, and 76.9% and 3.8% in the Quercus acutissima, respectively 2. In the Pinus densiflora, regression fomula of stemflow, throughfall, and net rainfall to gross precipitation are S$_{f}$ = 0.01GP-2.05 ($r^2$=0.54) T$_{f}$ = 0.79Gp - 26.04 ($r^2$=0.92), N$_{r}$ = 0.81Gp - 28.09 ($r^2$=0.92). Stemflow and throughfall increased in direct proportion to gross precipitation. 3. In the Quercus acutissima, regression fomula of stemflow, throughfall, and net rainfall to gross precipitation are S$_{f}$ = 0.03Gp + 12.25 ($r^2$=0.74), T$_{f}$ = 0.78Gp + 19.75 ($r^2$=0.96), N$_{r}$ = 0.81Gp + 3199 ($r^2$=0.96), respectively. Comparing with two species, gross precipitation has a much larger effect on the stemflow and throughfall of Quercus acutissima than those of Pinus densiflora. 4. In the analysis of intercorrelation between stemflow and throughfall of each species and crown area(CA), diameter at breast height(DBH), and gross precipitation(Gp), correlation coefficient was higher by following order at each species; Gp>CA>DBH on stemflow of Pinus densinora, Gp>DBH>CA on stemflow of Quercus acutissima, and Gp>CA>DBH on throughfall of Pinus densiflora and Quercus acutissima.ssima.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÀÓ¿Ü¿ì;¼ö°£·ù;¼ö°üÅë°ú¿ì;¼ö·®¹èºÐ;¹°¼öÁö½Ä;GROSS PRECIPITATION;STEMFLOW;THROUGHFALL;WATER QUANTITY DIVISION;WATER BUDGET EQUATION;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.12, no.3, 1998³â, pp.259-270
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199811922083720)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿