¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.15, no.3, 2001³â, pp.230-236
»ê¼º°­ÇϹ° Á¶°ÇÇÏ¿¡¼­ Ȱ¿±¼ö¸² »ýŰèÀÇ ¾ç·á¼øÈ¯ ¾ç»ó
( Pattern of Nutrient Fluxes in Deciduous Forest Ecosystem Imparted by Acidic Deposition )
; ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÀϺ» ºÏÇØµµ Áö¹æÀÇ ÀÓÇØ°ø¾÷´ÜÁö¿¡ ÀÎÁ¢µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â Á¡¼Ò¸ñÁö¿ª ³» Ȱ¿±¼ö õ¿¬¸²¿¡¼­ ÁÖ¿ä ¿°±â¼º ¾çÀ̿¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹°Áú¼øÈ¯ ¼öÁö¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰíÀÚ °­¿ì(wet deposition), ÀÓ³»¿ì(throughfall), ¼ö°£·ù(stemflow) ±×¸®°í Åä¾çħÅõ¼ö(soil leachate)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À̿ flux¸¦ Á¤·®È­ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç °á°ú °­¿ì´Â Æò±Õ pH 4.3ÀÇ °­ÇÑ »ê¼º¿ì·Î °­¿ì¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ $H^{+}$ flux´Â 034kmo1$_{c }$ $ha^{-1}$ /À̾ú°í, ÀÓ³»¿ì¿Í ¼ö°£·ù¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿°±â¼º ¾çÀÌ¿Â($K{+ }$ , $Na^{+}$ , $Ca^{ 2+ }$, $Mg^{2+}$ )ÀÇ flux´Â $1.6kmol_{c}$ ha$^{-1}$ ·Î °­¿ìÀÇ 0.49 kmolc $ha^{-1+}$ /º¸´Ù 3¹è ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ¼ö°üÃæ ¿ëÅ»(canopy leaching)¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿°±â¼º ¾çÀÌ¿ÂÀÇ flux´Â 0.95kmo1c $ha^{H}$ ·Î °­¿ì¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ $H^{+}$ fluxº¸´Ù 2.8¹è ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, H$^{+}$´Â ¼ö°üÃþ¿¡¼­ ġȯ¼º ¾çÀ̿µ鿡 ÀÇÇØ¼­ °ÅÀÇ ¼ÒºñµÇ¾ú´Ù. Åä¾çÃþ¿¡¼­ À̿¹èÃâ flux´Â Åä¾çƯ¼º¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, Åä¾ç Áß CaÀº proton¼Òºñ¿¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ÀÎÀÚ·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ýŰèÀÇ ¹°Áú¼øÈ¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼öÁö¿¡¼­ Na, Ca¹× MgÀº »ýÅÂ°è ³»ºÎ¿¡¼­ ¿ÜºÎ·Î ¹æÃâµÇ´Â ¾çº¸´Ù »ýŰè·Î À¯ÀԵǰí ÀÖ´Â ¾çÀÌ ¸¹¾Æ »ýŰ迡 ÃàÀûµÇ°í ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª, KÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â ºÎÀÇ flux¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù.
The fluxes of wet deposition(WD), throughfall(TF), stemflow(SF) and soil leachates were measured to understand base cation budgets on deciduous ecosystem impacted by acidic deposition in the north-western part of Tomakomai in Hokkaido, Japan. The flux of $H^{+}$ for wet deposition was $0.34kmo1_{c}$ $ha^{2+}$ and the flux of base cation, $K^{+}$ /, Na$^{ + }$, $Ca^{2+}$ and $Mg^{2+}$ far throughfall plus stemflow wart 1.6 kmolc $ha^{-1}$ , 3 times higher level than that for wet deposition. The flux of base cation for canopy leaching(LI) was 0.95 kmolc ha$^{-1}$ , 2.8 times higher level than $H^{+}$ sources in wet deposition. The major mechanism of $^{+}$ consumption closely related to acidic neutralizing capacity of canopy. The ionic flux for soil leachates from Boil reservoir and proton consumption in soil was dependent on soil chemical states and exchangeable Ca in soil had a major factor of H$^{+ }$ consumption. The base cation budgets on deciduous ecosystem showed positive balance fur Na, Ca and Mg, while K was the negative value.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÀÓ³»¿ì;¼ö°£·ù;Åä¾çħÅõ¼ö;¼ö°üÃþ ¿ëÅ»;¹°Áú¼öÁö;WET DEPOSITION;THROUGHFALL STEMFLOW;SOIL LEACHATE;CANOPY LEACHING;CATION BUDGET;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.15, no.3, 2001³â, pp.230-236
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200111920904794)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿