|
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.16, no.1, 2002³â, pp.10-21
|
ÀÓÇØ¸Å¸³Áö Á¶°æ¼ö¸ñÀÇ ÇÇÇØÇöȲ ¹× ¿äÀκм®
( Injuries of Landscape Trees and Causes in the Reclaimed Seaside Areas ) |
ÃÖÀÏÈ«;Ȳ°æÈñ;À̰æÀç; ´ëÇÑÁÖÅðø»ç ÁÖÅõµ½Ã¿¬±¸¿ø;´ëÇÑÁÖÅðø»ç ÁÖÅõµ½Ã¿¬±¸¿ø;¼¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°úÇдëÇÐ;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ÀÓÇØ¸Å¸³Áö¿¡ ½ÄÀçµÈ Á¶°æ¼ö¸ñÀÇ ÇÇÇØµµ¿Í ½ÄÀçȯ°æÀ¸·Î¼ ±× ¿µÇâ¿äÀÎÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Áߺαǿª°ú ³²ºÎ±Ç¿ªÀÇ 8°³ ÀÓÇØ¸Å¸³Áö¿¡ ½ÄÀçµÈ ÃÑ 42Á¾ 1,233ÁÖÀÇ ¼ö¸ñÇÇÇØµµ¿Í ÃÑ 6¼öÁ¾ 130ÁÖÀÇ °¡Áö±æÀÌ »ýÀå·®À» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´°í, Åä¾çÀÇ ¿°ºÐÇÔ·®, Åä¾ç°æµµ, Åä¾ç»êµµ, ¹è¼ö½Ã¼³ ¼³Ä¡¿©ºÎ µîÀÇ Åä¾çȯ°æ ¿äÀΰú ÇØ¾ÈÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ À̰ݰŸ® µî ÀÓÇØ¸Å¸³Áö¿¡¼ÀÇ ½ÄÀç ȯ°æ¿äÀÎÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú, »ó·Ïħ¿±¼öÁ¾ÀÇ Æò±Õ ÇÇÇØµµ´Â 32%·Î ³«¿±¼öÁ¾ÀÇ Æò±Õ ÇÇÇØµµ 52%º¸´Ù ³·¾Ò´Ù. ÇÇÇØµµ°¡ ³·Àº ¼öÁ¾Àº ÇØ¼Û, ¼¶À㳪¹«, °¡ÀÌÁî±î Ç⳪¹«, ¾Æ¿Ö³ª¹«, µ¿¹é³ª¹«, ÈĹڳª¹« µîÀ̾ú°í, ÇÇÇØµµ°¡ ³ôÀº ¼öÁ¾Àº ´Üdz³ª¹«, ¸ñ·Ã, ¹è·Õ³ª¹«, °¨³ª¹«, °è¼ö³ª¹«, ¸¶°¡¸ñ, ¿Õº¢³ª¹«, ¼Ò³ª¹«, ¸ð°ú³ª¹«, Àڱͳª¹«, ´ÀƼ³ª¹« µîÀ̾ú´Ù. ÀÓÇØ¸Å¸³Áö ½ÄÀç¼ö¸ñÀÇ ÇÇÇØ´Â Åä¾ç¿°ºÐÀÇ ¿µÇ⺸´Ù´Â °ÇÑ ÇØÇ³, ³ôÀº Åä¾ç°æµµ, ô¹ÚÇÑ Åä¾çÀÇ ¿µÇâÀÌ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. ¼ö¸ñÀÌ ÇÇÇØ¸¦ ¹Þ´Â Åä¾ç ¿°ºÐ³óµµ 0.03% ÀÌÇϸ¦ À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§Çؼ´Â °¹¹úÅä¾ç¿¡¼ »Ñ¸® ºÐ°¡Áö ÃÖ¼Ò 1.7mÀÇ ¼ºÅä°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç. Åä½É 77cm°¡Áö »Ñ¸®°¡ »¸¾îÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÈ ±Ù±ÇÃþÀÇ Åä¾ç°æµµ´Â 4.Skg/§©·Î ³ô¾Ò´Ù. Åä¾ç»êµµµµ ÃÑ 25°³ ½Ã·á Áß 22°³ ½Ã·á°¡ pH 3.72~5.85ÀÇ »ê¼ºÅä¾çÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. µ¿ÀÏ ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ °æ¿ì, ÇØ¾È¿¡¼ À̰ݰŸ®°¡ Å« °æ¿ì, ¹è¼ö½Ã¼³ÀÌ ¼³Ä¡µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ ±× ÇÇÇØµµ°¡ ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. |
|
This study was intended to investigate injury rates of landscape trees planted in the reclaimed seaside areas and to analyse their causes in planting environment. The planting environment such as soil properties, reclaimed depth of soil, soil hardness, salt consistency of soil, and drainage system were surveyed in 8 reclaimed seaside areas in the middle and southern regions of the country. Injury rates of 42 species, 1,233 trees and growth of branches in 6 species. 130 trees were measured and analysed to fond out salt-resistant trees in the reclaimed lands. The results of the survey are as follows; the average injury rate of evergreen trees was 32%. which was much lower than that of deciduous trees as 52%. The lower injured trees in the 8 reclaimed lands were Pinus thunbergii, Pinus parvinora. Juniperus chinensis 'Kaizuka', Pinus koraiensis, Acer trifdum, Koelreuteria paniculata and Metasequoia glyptostroboides. The higher injured trees were Acer palmatum, Magnolia kobus. Lagerstroemia indica, Diospiros kaki, Cercidiphyllum japonicum, Sorbus commixta, Prunus yedoensis, Pinus desinora, Chaenomeles sinensis, Albizzia julibrissin and Zelkowa serrata. At least the mounding of 1.7m depth of soil is needed from the tidal saline soil to the roots of trees to protect trees from salt injury Roots of trees were found to have infiltrated to 0.77m under the soil of which solidity was over 4.5kg/§©. And 22 of total 25 soils were acid from pH 3.72 to pH 5.85. Injury rate of trees was much higher when they were detached from the sea, and planted on the drainage. |
|
Ű¿öµå |
¼ö¸ñÇÇÇØÀ²;ÇÇÇØ¿äÀÎ;¼ö¸ñ»ýÀå·®;³»¿°¼º;DEGREE OF INJURIES OF TREES;CAUSES OF INJURIES;GROWTH OF TREES;SALT-RESISTANCY; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.16, no.1, 2002³â, pp.10-21
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200211921032894)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|