¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.17, no.1, 2003³â, pp.92-100
±¹¸³°ø¿ø Ž¹æ¿¹¾àÁ¦ ½ÃÇà¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Å½¹æ°´ ÀÇ½Ä Á¶»ç - ¼³¾Ç»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø Ž¹æ°´À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î-
( A Survey on the Visitor's Cognition of Visitor Reservation System in National Park - The Case Study of Soraksan National Park - )
ÀÌÁÖ¼ö;Á¶ÁßÇö;±è¿ë±Ù; (ÁÖ)¾Æ½æ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú ´ëÇпø;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ °ÇÃࡤµµ½Ã¡¤Á¶°æÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â 2001~2002³â¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ¼³¾Ç»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿ø¿¡¼­ ½Ã¹ü ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú´ø Ž¹æ¿¹¾àÁ¦¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Å½¹æ°´µéÀÇ ÀνÄÀ» Á¶»ç.ºÐ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ Å½¹æ¿¹¾àÁ¦°¡ ½ÃÇàµÈ ±â°£ Áß¿¡ ¼³¾Ç»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀ» ãÀº Ž¹æ°´µéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î »çȸ°æÁ¦Àû Ư¼º, ¹æ¹®À¯Çü°ú ÀÌ¿ëÇàÅÂ, Ž¹æ¿¹¾àÁ¦ÀÇ ½ÃÇà¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÎ½Ä µîÀ» ÁÖ¿ä ³»¿ëÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ȸ¼öµÈ 170ºÎÀÇ ¼³¹®Áö Áß ºÐ¼®ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ À¯È¿Ç¥º»Àº 165ºÎ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú, ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀÇ »çȸ°æÁ¦Àû Ư¼º, ¹æ¹®À¯Çü µîÀº ´Ù¸¥ ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ Å½¹æ°´ Á¶»ç¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³­ °á°ú¿Í À¯»çÇÑ °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ÀÀ´äÀÚ ´ëºÎºÐÀº Ž¹æ¿¹¾àÁ¦ÀÇ ½ÃÇàÀ» ÀÎÁöÇϰí ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, Ž¹æ¿¹¾àÁ¦ÀÇ µµÀÔ¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­µµ ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ¹ÝÀÀÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀº ´ëü·Î ±¹¸³°ø¿ø °ü¸®°ø´Ü¿¡¼­ ½ÃÇàÇÏ´Â Á¦µµ(ÀÚ¿¬È޽ijâÁ¦, ½Ã¼³¹° ¿¹¾àÁ¦ µî)¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­ ºÎÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ÀνÄÀ» Áö´Ï°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. Ž¹æ¿¹¾àÁ¦ ±¸°£ÀÇ È®´ë½ÃÇà¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ Àνİú ºÎÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ÀνÄÀÌ °ÅÀÇ µ¿µîÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, Ž¹æ¿¹¾àÁ¦ÀÇ ¿øÈ°ÇÑ ¿î¿µÀ» À§ÇØ ¿¹¾à ºÒÀÌÇàÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀûÀýÇÑ Æä³ÎƼÁ¦µµÀÇ µµÀÔ¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â Âù¼ºÇÏ´Â ÀÀ´äÀÌ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
The purpose of this study is to survey and analyze of the visitor's cognition of Visitor-Reservation System in Soraksan National Park. To accomplish the purpose, a questionnaire survey was employed in Soraksan National Park. The contents of questionnaire consist of the socioeconomic characteristics and the types of visiting, the activity, the cognition of Visitor-Reservation System. 166 samples of total 170 respondents were used for final analysis. As a result of the analysis, the socioeconomic characteristics and the type of visiting were showed similar trends with results from other National Park visitor survey Most of respondents recognized the enforcement Visitor-Reservation System and A majority of respondents affirmatively recognized the introduction Visitor-Reservation System. Most of respondents wanted an easy method reservation and cancel in enforcement Visitor-Reservation System. Besides Most of respondents recognized negative conception on regulation(nature-rest system, facility-reservation system etc) of National Park Authority(N.P.A). About expanding enforcement Visitor-Reservation System of National Park's preservation, 'Agree Group' was almost equal with 'Disagree Group'. About more effect operate the Visitor-Reservation System Most of respondents were agree to introduce penalty.
 
Ű¿öµå
Ž¹æ°´ °ü¸®;ÀÚ¿¬È޽ijâÁ¦;Æä³ÎƼÁ¦µµ;VISITOR MANAGEMENT;NATURE-REST SYSTEM;PENALTY;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.17, no.1, 2003³â, pp.92-100
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200311921704749)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿