¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.17, no.3, 2003³â, pp.285-294
ÀÚ¿¬°ø¿ø ÈÞ¾çÀÚ¿øÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëÀûÇÕ¼º Æò°¡
( An Evaluation on Use Suitability of Recreation Resource in Natural Parks )
¹è¹Î±â;½Å¿ø¼·; ´ë±¸´ëÇб³ ÇàÁ¤Çаú;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ »ï¸²°úÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÚ¿¬°ø¿øÀÇ °¢ ÈÞ¾çÀÚ¿øÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÀûÇÕ¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ±¸¸íÇÏ¿© ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ ÀÚ¿¬°ø¿ø ÈÞ¾çÀÚ¿øÀÇ °ü¸®¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ Áö½ÄÀ» Á¦°øÇÔÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÑ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â 11Á¡ µî°£Ã´µµÀÇ Á¡¼öºÎ°úü°è¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÚ¿¬°ø¿ø 6°³¼Ò¿¡¼­ ÃÑ 385¸íÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ´ÙÁßȸ±ÍºÐ¼® ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î °ËÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½ÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 1) ÁöÇü, »çȸÀû ÀÚ¿ø. ¹®È­Àû ÀÚ¿ø, °æ°ü, Çâ±â$.$»ö$.$¼Ò¸®°¡ 5%ÀÇ À¯ÀǼöÁØ¿¡¼­ ÀÌ¿ëÀûÇÕ¼º¿¡ Åë°èÀû À¯ÀǼºÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ¸íµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç. À̵é ÀÚ¿øÀÇ ¼öÁØÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇÒ¼ö·Ï ÀÚ¿¬°ø¿ø ÈÞ¾çÀÚ¿øÀÇ ÀüüÀûÀÎ ÀÌ¿ëÀû ÇÕ¼ºÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ¸íµÇ¾ú´Ù. 2) ÈÞ¾çÀÚ¿ø Áß¿¡¼­ ÀÌ¿ëÀûÇÕ¼ºÀÇ °ªÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ ¿µÇâ·ÂÀÌ °¡Àå Å« °ÍÀº ÁöÇüÀ̾ú´Ù. 3) ÀÚ¿¬°ø¿øÀÇ ÈÞ¾çÀÚ¿øµé Áß¿¡¼­ ÀÌ¿ëÀûÇÕ¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ó´ëÀû ±â¿©µµÀÇ Å©±â´Â ¹®È­Àû ÀÚ¿øÀ» 1.00À¸·Î ÇÒ ¶§. ÀÌ¿¡ ºñÇØ Çâ±â$.$»ö$.$¼Ò¸®´Â 1.05¹è. »çȸÀû ÀÚ¿øÀº 1.56¹è. °æ°üÀº 2.16¹è. ÁöÇüÀº 2.70¹è ´õ Áß¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú´Â ÈÞ¾çÀÚ¿øÀÇ Æò°¡¿Í °ü¸®ÀÇ ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¸¦ °áÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ÇϳªÀÇ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î Ȱ¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
The purpose of this paper is to provide useful knowledge for recreation management in natural park(NP) by evaluating use suitability of recreation resource. We had obtained data through a questionnaire, which surveyed 385 visitors at 6 of the 73 NP in Korea in 2001, based on stratified sampling method. We have analyzed the data using the multiple regression method. We found that 1) in bivariate analysis, the relationships between use suitability and all the recreation resources are fairly high and statistically significant. The higher the degree of recreation resources, the higher the degree of use suitability. 2) in multivariate analysis, topography, social resource(SR), cultural resource(CR), landscape, smell, color and sound(SCS) have been turned out to be statistically significant at one percent level. 3) the direction of relationship between topography, SR, CR, landscape, SCS and use suitability is same. 4) in relative contribution of the use suitability of recreation resource, level of topography has been turned out to have about 1.05, 1.56, 2.16 and 2.70 times more important than that of SCS, SR, landscape, topography, respectively This results will be used for a criterion for recreation resource evaluation and a settlement of management priority and increasing user's satisfaction.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÁöÇü;°æ°ü;¾ß»ýµ¿½Ä¹°;»çȸ¹®È­Àû ÀÚ¿ø;´ÙÁßȸ±Í¸ðÇü;¼±È£¿äÀÎ Á¢±Ù¹æ¹ý;TOPOLOGY;LANDSCAPE;SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCE;WILD PLANT AND ANIMAL;MULTIPLE REGRESSION MODEL;PREFERENCE FACTOR APPROACH;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.17, no.3, 2003³â, pp.285-294
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200311922098262)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿