¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.17, no.4, 2004³â, pp.366-374
½Ã°¡Áö³» »ê¾Ç°æ°ü°ü¸®¸¦ À§ÇÑ Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ÀÇ ¼öÁ÷»óÇâ µ¿ÀÇ °ËÁõ
( The Examination of the Validity of a Vertically Upward Shifting of the Landscape Control Point(LCP) for the Management of Cities Mountain Landscape )
Á¤Á¤¼·;±Ç»óÁØ;Á¶Åµ¿; ûÁÖ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;ûÁÖ´ëÇб³ ȯ°æÁ¶°æÇаú;°­¸ª´ëÇб³ ȯ°æÁ¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ½Ã°¡Áö³»¿¡¼­ÀÇ »ê¾Ç°æ°ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ ¼öÁ÷»óÇâ À̵¿ÀÇ Å¸´ç¼ºÀ» ±¸¸íÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÇâÈÄ °íÃþÈ­, °ú¹ÐÈ­µÈ ½Ã°¡Áö³»¿¡¼­ÀÇ Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ ¼³Á¤¹æ¾ÈÀÇ ±Ù°Å ÀڷḦ Á¦½ÃÇϰíÀÚ, ù° Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ÀÇ ¼öÁ÷»óÇâ À̵¿ ÀüÈÄÀÇ »êÀÇ ½Ã°¢·® ¹× ¾Ó°¢ÀÇ À¯ÀÇÂ÷ ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÏ¿© t-°ËÁ¤ ºÐ¼®À» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, µÑ°, »êÁ¤ÀÇ °¡½Ã¿©ºÎ ¹× »êÀÇ Æò±Õ ³ì½ÃÀ²À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ÀÇ ¼öÁ÷»óÇâ À̵¿ ÀüÈÄÀÇ ½Ã°¢·®À» ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ º» ¿¬±¸°á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1) Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ÀÇ ¼öÁ÷ »óÇâÀ̵¿ ÀüÈÄÀÇ ´ÜÀ§°£ Ç¥°íÂ÷´Â Æò±Õ 15.39m·Î½á °Ç¹° 4Ãþ Á¤µµÀÇ ¼öÁØÂ÷¸¦ °®´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ¸íµÇ¾ú´Ù. 2) Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ ¼öÁ÷»óÇâ À̵¿ ÀüÈÄÀÇ »êÀÇ ½Ã°¢·®Àº 1%ÀÇ À¯ÀǼöÁØ¿¡¼­ ÇöÀúÇÑ Â÷À̰¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î È®ÀεǾúÀ¸³ª À̶§ÀÇ ¾Ó°¢ÀÇ Â÷´Â À¯ÀÇÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ¸íµÇ¾ú´Ù. Áï Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ÀÇ ¼öÁ÷ »óÇâÀ̵¿ ÀüÈÄÀÇ ½Ã°¢±¸Á¶´Â µ¿ÀÏÇÏÁö¸¸ ½ÃÁ¡ À̵¿ÈÄ »êÀÇ ½Ã°¢·®ÀÌ ¿ì¼¼ÇÏ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¾Ë¾Ò´Ù. 3) »êÁ¤ÀÇ °¡½Ã¿Í »êÀÇ Æò±Õ ³ì½ÃÀ²À» »óȸÇÏ´Â Á¶¸ÁÁ¡Àº °Ç¹°¿Á»ó³ôÀÌ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ºóµµ¼ö°¡ ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ½Ã°¢·®ÀÇ t-°ËÁ¤ ºÐ¼®°á°ú ¿ª½Ã Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ÀÇ ¼öÁ÷»óÇâ À̵¿ ÀüÈİ¡ 5% À¯ÀǼöÁØ¿¡¼­ »êÀÇ ½Ã°¢·®ÀÇ Â÷À̰¡ °ËÁõµÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ °á°ú´Â »êÀ» ÀûÀýÈ÷ Á¶¸ÁÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¾Ó°¢±Ç¿ª ³»¿¡ °íÃþ°Ç¹°ÀÌ ¹ÐÁýµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â ½Ã°¡Áö°¡ Æ÷Ç﵃ ¶§ÀÇ Á¶¸ÁÁ¡ ¼³Á¤½Ã ±Ù°Å ÀÚ·á·Î Ȱ¿ëµÉ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ½Ã°¡Áö³» Æ÷ÇÔµÈ Á¶¸ÁÁ¡µéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© ¾Ó°¢ÀÇ Á¶°Ç¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê´Â ¼öÁرîÁö ½ÃÁ¡À» ¼öÁ÷ »óÇâ À̵¿ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ºÒ¸®ÇÑ ½Ã°¢·®À» È®º¸ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù ¼öÁ÷ À̵¿µÈ »óÅ´ À̵¿Àü°ú´Â ´Þ¸® ½ÃÁ¡ÀÇ Æ¯¼ö¼ºÀÌ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ³ª, ¾Ó°¢ÀÇ À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù¸é ¼­·Î µ¿ÀÏÇÑ Á¶¸Á±¸Á¶·Î °£ÁÖÇÏ¿© »ê¾Ç °æ°ü°ü¸®¸¦ À§ÇÑ º¸Á¸Àû Áö ħÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.o that encryption and decryption can share the S-boxes. The round keys are generated by on-the-fly key scheduler. The crypto-processor designed in Verilog-HDL and synthesized using 0.25-$mu extrm{m}$ CMOS cell library consists of about 23,000 gates. Simulation results show that the critical path delay is about 8-ns and it can operate up to 120-MHz clock Sequency at 2.5-V supply. The designed core was verified using Xilinx FPGA board and test system.and vegetables. "Being treated as a valuable customer" and "ease of finding things"were the two least important factors. Families whose housewives were in their thirties valued "cleanness of the store"and "being treated as a valuable customer"important factors when they decided the place. Families whose housewives had less than middle school education thought that price, availability of
By clearing up the validity of a vertically upward shifting of the LCP for cities' mountain landscape, this study can present the base source of a plan of setting the LCP of a skyscraper-bound and jam-packed-with-the-buildings city. For this, T-test has been performed first to analyze the significant difference of an angle of elevation and a mountain's visual quantities before and after vertically upward shifting. Secondly, visual quantities of a mountain before and after vertically upward shifting have been analyzed in a compared way according to a visibility of mountaintop and a mountain's average green possession rate. The result is as follows: 1) The unit altitude difference before and after the vertical alteration of the LCP is an average of about 15.39m-in other words, the height of nearly a few-story building. 2) A mountain's visual quantities before and after a vertically upward shifting of the LCP have been confirmed to have a striking difference at one per cent of a significant level but at the same time the gap of the elevation is proved insignificant, which means the visual structure is not affected by alteration but visual quantities of a mountain have become superior after a shifting of a viewpoint. 3) The LCP securing a visibility of a mountaintop as well as topping a mountain's average-green possession rate has largely shown at the height of a rooftop of a building. The analysis of T-test for visual quantities has proved the LCP before and after vertically upward shifting also has a difference at five percent of a significant level. The findings of this research can be applied as a base source when setting LCP if the city is concerned which is jam-packed with the high-rise building within the elevation boundary feasible for a ordinary view of a mountain. A disadvantageous visual quantity can be improved by vertically shifting a visual point to the extent that the condition of an angle of elevation is preserved concerning the LCP included in a city. The vertically changed visual point actually has been approved to have distinctiveness which is different from the one not altered, if an angle of elevation, however, has no significant difference, then being possibly regarded as being the same visual structures, the conservational guide to the management of mountainscape can be presented.
 
Ű¿öµå
»êÀÇ Æò±Õ³ì½ÃÀ²;°Ç¹°¿Á»ó³ôÀÌ;MOUNTAIN'S AVERAGE GREEN POSSESSION RATE;ROOFTOP OF A BUILDING;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.17, no.4, 2004³â, pp.366-374
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200411922098459)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿