¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.18, no.1, 2004³â, pp.42-52
¿ëÀû·ü º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ °øµ¿ÁÖÅà ´ÜÁö³» ³ìÁö±¸Á¶ º¯È­Æ¯¼º
( The Change of the Structure of Green Space by the Change of the Floor Area Ratio in Apartment Complex )
±èÁ¤È£;À̰æÀç;±èÁ¤È£; ¼­¿ï½Ã °­¼­±¸Ã»;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°úÇдëÇÐ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°úÇבּ¸¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â °øµ¿ÁÖÅôÜÁö ¿ëÀû·üº¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ³ìÁö¸éÀû ¹× ³ìÁö±¸Á¶ÀÇ º¯È­ÆÄ¾ÇÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ë»óÁö´Â ¿ëÀû·ü 100%ÀÌÇÏ, ¿ëÀû·ü 250%ÀÌÇÏ, ¿ëÀû·ü 250%ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¼¼ À¯ÇüÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© °¢ À¯Çüº°·Î 2°³¼Ò¾¿ ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 1970¢¦1980³â¿¡ Á¶¼ºÇÑ ¿ëÀû·ü 99%ÀÎ È­°îÁ¦2ÁÖ°ø¾ÆÆÄÆ®¿Í ¿ëÀû·ü 73%ÀÎ °³Æ÷ÁÖ°ø¾ÆÆÄÆ®´Â ³ìÁö¸éÀû ºñÀ² 40.23¢¦44.23%, ³ìÁö Æø 3¢¦ 15m ³ìÁö ·® 1.06¢¦1.71§©£¯$m^2$, ±³¸ñÃþ ½ÄÀç¹Ðµµ 0.04¢¦0.06ÁÖ£¯$m^2$ °ü¸ñÃþ ½ÄÀç¹Ðµµ 0.06 ¢¦0.20ÁÖ£¯$m^2$À̾ú´Ù. 1990³â´ë¿¡ Á¶¼ºÇÑ ¿ëÀû·ü 226%ÀÎ µîÃÌÁÖ°ø¾ÆÆÄÆ®¿Í ¿ëÀû·ü 240%ÀÎ °³È­ ¾ÆÆÄÆ®´Â ³ìÁö¸éÀûºñÀ² 24 16¢¦26.16%, ³ìÁöÆø3¢¦7m, ³ìÁö·® 0.84¢¦l.54§©£¯$m^2$, ±³¸ñÃþ ½ÄÀç¹Ðµµ 0.18¢¦0.31ÁÖ£¯$m^2$, °ü¸ñÃþ ½ÄÀç¹Ðµµ0.15¢¦0.35ÁÖ£¯$m^2$À̾ú´Ù. 1990³â´ë¸»¿¡ Á¶¼ºÇÑ ¿ëÀû·ü 269%ÀÎ ÇѺ¸±¸¾Ï¾ÆÆÄÆ®¿Í ¿ëÀû·ü 376%ÀÎ µ¿¾Æ3Â÷¾ÆÆÄÆ®´Â ³ìÁö¸éÀûºñÀ² 23.47¢¦25.53%, ³ìÁöÆø 2¢¦6m, ³ìÁö·®1.06¢¦2.12§©£¯$m^2$, ±³¸ñÃþ ½ÄÀç¹Ðµµ 0.25ÁÖ£¯$m^2$, °ü¸ñÃþ ½ÄÀç¹Ðµµ 0.22¢¦0.37ÁÖ£¯$m^2$À̾ú´Ù. ¿ëÀû·üº¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ³ìÁö±¸Á¶ ºÐ¼®°á°ú ³ìÁö¸éÀûÀº ¿ëÀû·üÀÌ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ³Ð¾úÀ¸³ª, ³ìÁö·®°ú ½ÄÀç¹Ðµµ´Â ¿ëÀû·üÀÇ º¯È­¿Í »ó°ü¾øÀÌ ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î ³·Àº »óÅÂÀ̾ú°í ½ÄÀ籸Á¶´Â ¿Ü·¡Á¾À§ÁÖÀÇ ´ÜÃþ±¸Á¶À̾ú´Ù.
The purpose of this study was to propose the change of green area and green structure according to the change of the Floor Area Ratio(FAR) of apartment complex. The survey site was selected two each of apartment complex after due consider three type that is, the FAR below 100£¥, the FAR below 250£¥ and the FAR over 250£¥. Green rate is 40.23¢¦44.23£¥, green width is 3¢¦15m, green volume is 1.06¢¦1.71§©£¯$m^2$, planting density of cannopy layer is 0.04¢¦0.06tree£¯$m^2$, planting density of understory layer is 0.06¢¦0.20tree£¯$m^2$ in case of Hwagok 2nd Jugong apartment(FAR 99£¥) and Gaepo Jugong apartment(FAR 73£¥) constructed in the 1970¢¦1980. Green rate is 24.16¢¦26.16£¥, green width is 3¢¦7m, green volume is 0.84¢¦1.54§©£¯$m^2$, planting density of cannopy layer is 0.18¢¦0.31tree£¯$m^2$, planting density of understory layer is 0.15¢¦0.35tree£¯$m^2$ in case of Deungchon Jugong aparment(FAR 226£¥) and Gaehwa apartment(FAR240£¥) construsted in the mid-1990's. Green rate is 23.47¢¦25.53£¥, green width is 2¢¦6m, green volume is 1.06¢¦2.12§©£¯$m^2$, planting density of cannopy layer is 0.25tree£¯$m^2$, planting density of understory layer is 0.22¢¦0.37tree£¯$m^2$ in case of Hanbo Guam apartment(FAR 269£¥) and Donga 3rd apartment(FAR 376£¥) constructed in the last-1990's. As the results of analysis of green structure according to changes of the Floor Area Ratio(FAR), the greater the FAR, the higher the rate of green area. The green volume and planted density is low without the change of the FAR and planted structure was simple-layer structure composed of alien woody species.
 
Ű¿öµå
³ìÁö·®;½ÄÀç¹Ðµµ;½ÄÀ籸Á¶;³ìÁö¸éÀû;GREEN VOLUME;PLANTING DENSITY;PLANTED STRUCTURE;GREEN AREA;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.18, no.1, 2004³â, pp.42-52
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200411922098317)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿