|
|
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.22, no.2, 2008³â, pp.159-172
|
°æ±âµµ ¼º³²½Ã µµ½ÃÁö¿ª ½ÀÁöÀÇ À¯Çü ºÐÆ÷ ¹× ½ÀÁö½Ä¹°ÀÇ Æ¯¼º Æò°¡
( Distributional Patterns and the Evaluation of Hydrophytic Plants of Urban Wetlands in Seongnam City, Gyunggi-do Province, Korea ) |
| Àü½ÂÈÆ; °æ¿ø´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â µµ½Ã»ýÅÂ°è ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÀûÁö·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ´Â °æ±âµµ ¼º³²½Ã¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½ÀÁö ÇöȲ, ½ÀÁö À¯Çü, ½ÀÁö½Ä¹°ÀÇ Æ¯¼º, ±×¸®°í ÈѼջóŸ¦ Á¶»ç ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼º³²½ÃÀÇ µµ½Ã½ÀÁö´Â 1Â÷ Á¶»ç°á°ú ¸ðµÎ 162°³¼Ò°¡ È®ÀεǾúÀ¸¸ç, ÀÔÁöÀû Ư¼º¿¡ µû¶ó »ê°£½ÀÁö 55°³¼Ò, ÇÏõº¯ ½ÀÁö 4°³¼Ò, ¹¬³í ¹× ¹¬¹ç 62°³¼Ò, ¿õµ¢ÀÌ 37°³¼Ò, Àú¼öÁö 4°³¼Ò µîÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÇ¾ú´Ù. 1Â÷ Á¶»ç°á°ú, ½ÀÁö·Î¼ÀÇ ÀáÀç·ÂÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜµÈ 107°³¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇØ 2Â÷ Á¤¹Ð ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÑ °á°ú ¾à 39%¿¡ ´ÞÇÏ´Â 42°³¼Ò°¡ ±Ô¸ð°¡ ÀÛ°í À°ÁöÈµÇ¾î ½ÀÁöÀÇ °¡Ä¡°¡ ¸Å¿ì ³·À¸¸ç ¸Å¸³ ¹× ¹è¼öÈ µîÀ¸·Î ½É°¢ÇÏ°Ô ÈѼյǰí ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÇмúÀûÀ¸·Î º¸Àü°¡Ä¡°¡ ³ôÀº Áß¿ä ½ÀÁö 27°³¼Ò¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼ö¹®È¯°æ Ư¼º°ú ½ÀÁö½Ä¹°ÀÇ ºÐÆ÷Ư¼ºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, ¼º³²½Ã µµ½Ã½ÀÁö´Â ¾ÆÁ÷µµ ¾çÈ£ÇÑ ¼öȯ°æ Á¶°Ç°ú ´Ù¾çÇѽÀÁö½Ä¹°ÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¿Í Á¤ÂøÈ¯°æÀÌ Çü¼ºµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Á¶»çµÈ 184Á¾·ùÀÇ ½Ä¹°Á¾ °¡¿îµ¥ ½ÀÁöÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀÎ ½Ä¹°Àº 75Á¾·ùÀÎ ¾à 40.7%ÀÇ ºñÀ²¿¡ ºÒ°úÇϸç, µû¶ó¼ ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ½ÀÁö°¡ À°»ó¿ª ½Ä¹°Á¾ÀÇ Ä§ÀÔ°ú °°Àº ÀÎÀ§ÀûÀÎ ±³¶õ»óÅ¿¡ ³õ¿©ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »ç½ÇÀº ½ÀÁö½Ä¹° ¿ì¼¼µµ Áö¼ö¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ½ÀÁöÀÇ º¸Àü»óŸ¦ Æò°¡ÇÑ °á°ú¿¡¼µµ ¼º³²½Ã ÀüüÀÇ °æ¿ì Áö¼ö °ªÀÌ ¾à 3.7·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª ½ÀÁöÆò°¡À¯º¸ ´Ü°è¸¦ ¹þ¾î³ ¾çÈ£ÇÑ À°»ó»ýÅÂ°è ¼öÁØ¿¡ ±ÙÁ¢Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼º³²½Ã°¡ Áߺγ»·úÀÇ »ê¾Çµµ½ÃÀÓÀ» °¨¾ÈÇÒ ¶§ Àü Áö¿ª¿¡ °í¸£°Ô ºÐÆ÷ÇÏ´Â »ê°£½ÀÁö¿Í ¹¬³í ¹× ¹¬¹çÀÇ ¹ß´ÞÀº ºñ·Ï ±Ô¸ð´Â ÀÛÀ¸³ª À°»ó°ú ¼ö°è »ýŰè»çÀÌÀÇ »ýÅÂÀû ÃßÀÌ´ë·Î »ýÅÂÀû °ÅÁ¡¿ªÇÒ Ãø¸é¿¡¼ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù. |
|
| This study was carried out to obtain ecological information necessary for a conservation plan based on the distributional patterns, wetland types, and hydrophytic characteristics of urban wetlands in Seongnam City, Kyunggi Province where representing the various patterns of land use made by rapid urbanization since 1970s. Total 162 sites of four wetland types were identified as urban wetlands during the first survey. The sites were classified into 55 forested swamps, 4 riverine wetlands, 62 abandoned paddy fields, 37 small ponds, and 4 reservoirs, etc. The second survey targeted 107 sites which were identified as good wetlands. It showed that 42 sites(about 39%) were already degraded due to drainage, landfill, and crop cultivation at 6 months intervals. Both hydrologic conditions and hydrophytic characteristics of 27 good wetlands help maintain current ecological status, but most wetlands have been degraded by artificial impacts. Among 184 species identified, only 75 species(about 40.7%) were hydrophytes. Prevalence Index of hydrophyte based on three categories of OBL(obligatory wetland plant), FAC(facultitative plant), UPL(obligatory upland plant) was 3.7, indicating that vegetation data alone is inadequate to designate as wetlands. This study revealed that as critical habitats for wildlife they playa vital role in ecotone between both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem with its proper distributional pattern in spite of their small areas compared to the entire geographic region of the City. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| µµ½Ã½ÀÁö;½ÀÁöÀ¯Çü;¿ì¼¼µµ Áö¼ö;»ýÅÂÀû ÃßÀÌ´ë;URBAN WETLAND;WETLANDS TYPES;PREVALENCE INDEX;ECOTONE; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.22, no.2, 2008³â, pp.159-172
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200820055487981)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|