¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.22, no.3, 2008³â, pp.309-319
Á¦ÁÖ »ý¹°±Çº¸ÀüÁö¿ª ³» ÇѶó»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ °æ°üºÐ¼® : ´ÜÆíÈ­ Çö»ó
( Landscape Analysis of the Hallasan National Park in a Jeju Island Biosphere Reserve: Fragmentation Pattern )
°­Çý¼ø;±èÇöÁ¤;ÀåÀº¹Ì; ¼º½Å¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ »ý¹°Çаú;¼º½Å¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ »ý¹°Çаú;(ÁÖ)Çѱ¹°ø°£Á¤º¸Åë½Å;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
µµ·Î´Â »ýŰ踦 ±³¶õ½ÃŰ´Â Àΰ£ Ȱµ¿ÀÇ ÁöÇ¥À̸ç ÈçÈ÷ ¼­½ÄÁö ´ÜÆíÈ­, ¼­½ÄÁö Ãà¼Ò, ¼­½ÄÁö °í¸³À» À¯¹ßÇÑ´Ù. Á¦ÁÖµµÀÇ ÇѶó»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø(¸éÀû=153.4$km^2$)Àº ÁöÇü, ÁöÁú, »ý¹°»óÀÇ Æ¯À̼ºÀÌ ³ôÀ¸¸ç À¯³×½ºÄÚ »ý¹°±Çº¸ÀüÁö¿ª(MAB)ÀÇ ÇÙ½ÉÁö¿ªÀ¸·Îµµ Áߺ¹ ÁöÁ¤µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. °ø¿øÀÇ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ³ôÀº º¸Àü°¡Ä¡°¡ ¸¹Àº Ž¹æ°´°ú µµ·Î°Ç¼³À» À¯µµÇϰí ÀÖÀ½¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í µµ·Î·Î ÀÎÇÑ °æ°üÀÇ º¯È­´Â °ÅÀÇ ¾Ë·ÁÁø ¹Ù°¡ ¾ø´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â GIS¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÇѶó»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ µµ·Î·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¼­½ÄÁö ´ÜÆíÈ­ ¾ç»óÀ» °ø¿ø ¿ëµµÁö±¸, ÇØ¹ß°íµµ, ½Ä»ý¿¡ °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æ÷Àåµµ·Î¿Í ¹ýÁ¤ ºñ¹ýÁ¤Å½¹æ·Î¿¡ °¢°¢ 112m, 60m ¹öÆÛ¸¦ Àû¿ë½ÃŲ °á°ú ÇѶó»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀº ÃÑ 100°³ÀÇ ´ÜÆíÀ¸·Î ³ª´µ¾ú´Ù. Æ÷Àåµµ·Î¿Í ¹ýÁ¤Å½¹æ·Î¸¸À» °í·ÁÇßÀ» ¶§ µå·¯³­ 10´ÜÆíÀÇ ¸éÀûÀº $0.002km^2-38.2km^2$(Æò±Õ¸éÀû=14.2 $km^2$)¿¡ À̸£·¶°í ÀÚ¿¬º¸Á¸Áö±¸¿Í ÀÚ¿¬È¯°æ Áö±¸ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ °¢±â ¾à 7%°¡ °¡ÀåÀÚ¸®·Î ÆÇÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌµé ´ÜÆíÀÇ ÇüÅÂÁö¼ö Æò±ÕÀº 5.19(100´ÜÆí Áß), 7.22(10´ÜÆí Áß)À̾úÁö¸¸ °ø¿øÀÇ µ¿¼­ ¾ç´Ü°ú Á¤»óºÎ±Ù¿¡ ÀÖ´Â ´ÜÆíµéÀÇ ÇüÅÂÁö¼ö°¡ º¸´Ù ³ô¾Ò´Ù. 5°³ÀÇ ¹ýÁ¤Å½¹æ·Î°¡ ¸ðµÎ ºÐÈ­±¸±îÁö ¿¬°áµÇ¾î ÀÖ°í °íµµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó, Ȱ¿±¼ö¸², ħ¿±¼ö¸², ÃÊÁö·Î ½Ä»ýÀÌ ÀüȯµÇ±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ³ôÀº °íµµ, ƯÈ÷ °íÀ¯½Ä¹°°ú °í»ê½Ä¹°ÀÌ ¸¹Àº °íµµ 1,400mÀÌ»óÀÇ ÃÊÁö¿¡¼­ ¼­½ÄÁö ¸éÀûÀÌ ÇöÀúÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇß´Ù. ÀÌ·± °á°ú´Â ÇѶó»ê±¹¸³ °ø¿øµµ µµ·Î·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¼­½ÄÁö ´ÜÆíÈ­¸¦ °Þ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ´ÜÆíÈ­·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¼­½ÄÁö ¾ÇÈ­¿Í ¼­½ÄÁö ¼Ò½ÇÀÇ À§ÇèÀÌ °ø¿øÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬È¯°æ Áö±¸º¸´Ù ÇѶó»ê Á¤»óÀÇ ¹é·Ï´ãÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â ÀÚ¿¬º¸Á¸Áö±¸¿¡¼­ ´õ ³ôÀ» ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» º¸¿©ÁØ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÇѶó»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ Çö µµ·Î¸ÁÀº »ýÅÂ°è º¸Àü°ú º¸È£¶ó´Â ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ ¸ñÇ¥¿¡ ºÎÇÕÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù°í »ç·áµÈ´Ù. ÇѶó»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø Àüü°¡ ¶ÇÇÑ MAB ÇÙ½ÉÁö¿ªÀÓÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ´Ù¸é, °ø¿ø ¿ëµµÁö±¸ÀÇ Àç¼³Á¤°ú ´ÜÆíÈ­¸¦ ¿ÏÈ­½Ã۱â À§ÇÑ °ø¿ø ³» µµ·Î°ü¸®¿¡ º¸Àü³ë·ÂÀÌ °æÁֵǾî¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
Roads are an indicator of anthropogenic activity causing ecosystem disturbances and often lead to habitat fragmentation, habitat loss, and habitat isolation. The Hallasan National Park(153.4$km^2$) on Jeju Island being distinguished for its unique geology, topography, and biota has also been designated as a core area of UNESCO Man and the Biosphere(MAB) Reserve. Although the high conservation value of this park has contributed to a rapid growth of tourists and road construction, landscape changes due to roads have not been examined yet. We used GIS systems to examine the fragmentation pattern caused by roads, in relation to its zonation, elevation, and vegetation. When a buffer was applied to roads(112m width for paved roads and 60m width for both legal and illegal trails), the park consisted of 100 fragments. The ten fragments generated after applying buffer to only paved roads and legal trails ranged from $0.002km^2$ to $38.2km^2$ with a mean of $14.2km^2$, and about 7% of both nature conservation zone and nature environment zone of the park were edge. Fragments in both east and west ends of the park and around the summit exhibited relatively high shape indices with means of 5.19(for 100 fragments) and 7.22(for 10 fragments). All five legal trails are connected to the pit crater of the mountain and vegetation changed from broadleaf forests and conifer forests to grasslands with elevation, consequently resulting in dramatic fragment size reduction in grasslands at high elevation, in particular above 1,400m, where endemic and alpine plants are abundant. These results show that in Hallasan National Park the risks of habitat deterioration and habitat loss due to fragmentation may be more severe in the nature conservation zone dominated by Baengnokdam than in the nature environment zone. Therefore, current road networks of the park appear to fall short of the goal of the national park for ecosystem conservation and protection. Considering that the entire Hallasan National Park also serves as a MAB core area, conservation efforts should focus, first of all, on park rezoning and road management to mitigate habitat fragmentation.
 
Ű¿öµå
µµ·Î¸Á;º¸Àü°¡Ä¡;¿ëµµÁö±¸;CONSERVATION VALUE;GIS;ROAD NETWORKS;ZONATION;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.22, no.3, 2008³â, pp.309-319
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200827651796258)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿