¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.24, no.2, 2010³â, pp.209-221
Çѱ¹ ¼­ÇؾÈÀÇ ³»¿°¼º ¹× ³»Á¶¼º ÀÚ»ý¼öÁ¾
( Native Tree Species of Tolerance to Saline Soil and Salt Spray Drift at the Coastal Forests in the West-Sea, Korea )
±èµµ±Õ; ¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÇØ¾È ¿°ÇØÁö ¼ö¸ñ ½ÄÀ縦 À§ÇÑ ³»¿°¼º ¹× ³»Á¶¼º ¼öÁ¾À» ¼±¹ßÇϰíÀÚ Çѱ¹ ¼­ÇØ¾È ÇØ¾È¸²ÀÇ ½Ä»ýÁ¶»ç¿Í Åä¾ç¿°ºÐµµ¸¦ Á¶»ç ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»çÁöÀÇ Åä¾ç¿°ºÐÀº Àüü Æò±Õ $EC_{1:5}$ 0.11dS$m^{-1}$À̾ú°í, ÃÖÀú 0.00dS$m^{-1}$, ÃÖ°í 0.68dS$m^{-1}$À̾ú´Ù. Åä¾ç¿°ºÐ($EC_{1:5}$)Àº ÇØ¾È Á¤¼±À¸·Î ºÎÅÍ ³»·ú ¹æÇâÀ¸·Î °¥¼ö·Ï ³·¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ¥°Áö´ë>¥±Áö´ë>¥²Áö´ë>¥³ Áö´ë ¼øÀ¸·Î °¢°¢ $EC_{1:5}$ 0.14dS$m^{-1}$, 0.11dS$m^{-1}$, 0.10dS$m^{-1}$, 0.08dS$m^{-1}$À̾ú´Ù. ÃâÇöÇÑ ÀÚ»ý½Ä¹°Àº 52°ú 104¼Ó 24º¯Á¾ 157Á¾ ÃÑ 181ºÐ·ù±ºÀ̾ú´Ù. Åä¾ç¿°ºÐÀÌ °¡Àå ³ôÀº ´Ü°èÀÎ $EC_{1:5}$ 0.51dS$m^{-1}$¸¦ ÃʰúÇÏ´Â °÷¿¡¼­ ECÀÇ Æ¯À̰ª ¶Ç´Â ÀÌ»óÄ¡ÀÇ ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î ¿©·¯ ¹ø ÃâÇöÇÏ´Â ¼öÁ¾Àº °õ¼Ö, û¹Ì·¡µ¢±¼, ¶±°¥³ª¹«, Á¹Âü³ª¹« µîÀ̾ú´Ù. $EC_{1:5}$ 0.41~0.50dS$m^{-1}$¿¡¼­´Â $EC_{1:5}$ 0.40dS$m^{-1}$ ÀÌÇÏ¿¡ ¼ÓÇÏ´Â ½Ä¹°µé À̿ܿ¡µµ ¿ÕÀڱͳª¹«, ¸Ö±¸½½³ª¹«, °è¿äµîÀ¸·Î ÃâÇöºóµµ°¡ ¸Å¿ì ³·¾Ò´Ù. Àüü Áö´ë¿¡ ÃâÇöÇÏ´Â ¼öÁ¾Àº ¸®±â´Ù¼Ò³ª¹«, ¼Ò³ª¹«, °õ¼Ö, ³ë°£ÁÖ³ª¹« µî À̾ú°í, Á߿䵵°¡ ³ôÀº ¼öÁ¾Àº ¼Ò³ª¹«, °õ¼Ö, ÀÌ´ë, û¹Ì·¡µ¢±¼, ±¼Çdzª¹« µîÀ̾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼öÁ¾Àº Á¶»çÁöÀÇ ÀÚ»ý ¼öÁ¾µé Áß¿¡¼­ ´Ù¸¥ ¼öÁ¾¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³»Á¶¼ºÀÌ °­ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù.
This study was carried out to apply basic data of the native trees for planting in the salinity area by the vegetation ecological selection. Which focused on native woody species to the tolerances of saline soil and salt spray drift on the coastal forests in the West-Sea, Korea. The soil salinity($EC_{1:5}$) was 0.11dS$m^{-1}$, ranging of 0.00dS$m^{-1}$~0.68dS$m^{-1}$. The soil salinity was gradually decreasing from Belt I to Belt ¥³ except the Belt I in some coastal windbreaks. The order of decreasing soil salinity was Belt I>Belt II>Belt III>Belt ¥³ and the soil salinity was $EC_{1:5}$ 0.14dS$m^{-1}$, 0.11dS$m^{-1}$, 0.10dS$m^{-1}$, and 0.08dS$m^{-1}$, respectively. The total 181 taxa consisted of 52 families, 104 genus, 157 species, and 24 varieties were recorded as the trees tolerating to both soil salinity and salt spray drift. The trees emerged in the highest degree of salinity($EC_{1:5}$ 0.51dS$m^{-1}$) was nothing but appearanced Pinus thunbergii Parl., Smilax china L., Quercus dentata Thunb. ex Murray, Quercus serrata Thunb. ex Murray and so on at the level of singular and ideal value. The emerged trees in the high salinity of $EC_{1:5}$0.41dS$m^{-1}$~0.50dS$m^{-1}$ were Albizia kalkora Prain, Melia azedarach L., Paederia scandens (Lour.) Merr. var. scandens These species were trees of tolerance to saline soil. The emerged woody species in all belts were Pinus rigida Mill., Pinus densiflora Siebold & Zucc., Pinus thunbergii Parl., Juniperus rigida Siebold & Zucc. and so on. The woody species with high important value(I.V.) were Pinus densiflora Siebold & Zucc., Pinus thunbergii Parl., Pseudosasa japonica (Siebold & Zucc. ex Steud.) Makino, Smilax china L., Platycarya strobilacea Siebold & Zucc. var. strobilacea for. strobilacea and so on, which can be classified as highly tolerant native trees to salt spray drift.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÇØ¾È½Ä»ý;Á¤¼±ºÎ½Ä»ý;Åä¾ç¿°ºÐ;¿°ÇØÁö;¿°ºÐÇÇÇØ;NATIVE WOODY SPECIES;VEGETATION OF COASTAL LINE;SOIL SALT;SALINITY AREA;SALT INJURY;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.24, no.2, 2010³â, pp.209-221
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201027463259758)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿