|
|
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.10, no.1, 1996³â, pp.14-23
|
±¹¸³°ø¿ø ÀÌ¿ëÇàÅ ¹× ¾²·¹±â 󸮸¦ À§ÇÑ Clean-up Time ¿î¿µ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌ¿ëÀÚÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä - ³»Àå»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î -
( Visitors' Cognitions of Clean-up Time Movement for Waste Treatment and Use Begavior in Naejangsan National Park ) |
| ±è¿ë±Ù;ÃÖ¼º½Ä;Á¶ÁßÇö; µ¿½Å´ëÇб³ ȯ°æÁ¶°æÇаú;µ¿½Å´ëÇб³ ȯ°æÁ¶°æÇаú ´ëÇпø;;µ¿½Å´ëÇб³ ȯ°æÁ¶°æÇаú ´ëÇпø;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ³»Àå»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ À̿밴 ÇàÅÂÁ¶»ç´Â 1995³â 10¿ù 31ÀϺÎÅÍ 11¿ù 3ÀϱîÁö ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú°í ÃÑ 151¸íÀÇ À̿밴ÀÌ Âü¿©ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̿밴ÀÇ »çȸ°æÁ¦Àû Ư¼ºÀ¸·Î´Â ³²ÀÚ°¡ 55%, ¿©ÀÚ°¡ 45%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ±³À°Á¤µµ´Â ´ëÁ¹ ÀÌ»óÀÌ 52%·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¿¬·Éº°·Î´Â 20´ë°¡ 61.3%·Î °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÀ´äÀÚÀÇ °¡À»Ã¶ ³»Àå»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ ¹æ¹®¸ñÀûÀº ÁÖ·Î ´Üdz°¨»óÀ» À§ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À̿밴 ´ëºÎºÐÀº ÀÌ¿ëÁ¤º¸¸¦ ¾È³»ÆÇÀ» ÅëÇØ¼(31.8%), ¶Ç´Â ±×µé ½º½º·Î ¾Ë¾Æ¼(29.1%)ȹµæÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶Ç ÀÌµé ´ëºÎºÐÀº Clean-up Time ¿îµ¿¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾ËÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖ¾ú°í, Çö¼ö¸·À» º» ÈÄ¿¡ ÀνÄÇÏ°Ô µÈ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ À̿밴Àº ³»Àå»ê¿¡¼ ¾È³»¹æ¼ÛÀ» µèÁö ¸øÇß´Ù°í ÀÀ´äÇÑ ¹Ý¸é, ±¹¸³°ø¿ø¿¡¼ ¾È³»¹æ¼ÛÀÇ Çʿ伺¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼´Â ±íÀÌ °ø°¨ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°úµéÀº Clean-up Time ¿îµ¿ÀÇ ¾²·¹±â Åõ±âÇàÀ§ °ü¸®È¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇØ ³»Àå»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀ» ¹æ¹®ÇÑ À̿밴µéÀÌ ±àÁ¤ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀνÄÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡À» ³ªÅ¸³»´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¡¿¡¼ ±¹¸³°ø¿ø¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ ´ëÁ߸Åü¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÈѼÕÇàÀ§ °ü¸®±â¹ýÀÇ µµÀÓÀº ¸¹Àº È¿°ú¸¦ °¡Á®´ÙÁÙ °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù. |
|
| Visitors to Naejangsan National Park were surveyed from October 31 to November 3 in 1995, 151 visitors were participated. Of those individuals, 55% were males. 48% of respondests reported that they had gone beyond high school, and over one-half(52%) had gone as far as college. 61.3% were 20 years of age. The largest percentage of respondents were reported that they visited Naejangsan Nat'l Park to see the scarlet maple leaces there. Most respondents who witness other visitors' littering were not likely to intervene to stop their visitors' depreciative behavior(Bystander intervention Begavior). Most of visitors got information for use Naejangsan Nat'l Park from a guide sign(31.8%) or guide themselves(29.1%). They didn't know the Clean-up Time Movement Program. But they understood it after notice hanging placards(81.6%). Most of visitors responded that didn't hear the mass communication program in National. But they recognized necessity of the mass communication program in National Park. The results showed that most visitors believed that Clean-up Time Movement was in succession consequently it turned out to be effective in managing visitors' littering behavior. And it seemed to effective in managing depreciative behavior through the mass communication program in National Park. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ȯ°æÈѼÕÇàÀ§;¾²·¹±â Åõ±âÇàÀ§;´ëÁ߸Åü ÇÁ·Î±×·¥;Ŭ¸°¾÷ ŸÀÓ ¿îµ¿;DEPRECIATIVE BEHAVIOR;LITTERING BEHAVIOR;MASS COMMUNICATION PROGRAM;CLEAN-UP TIME MOVEMENT; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.10, no.1, 1996³â, pp.14-23
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199611920718449)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|