¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.11, no.4, 1998³â, pp.493-505
¼³¾Ç»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ÀÚ¾çõÁö¿ª ¼Ò³ª¹«¸² ±ºÁý±¸Á¶ ¹× »ýÀ°°Å¸®
( Vegetation Structure Analysis and Ecological Distance of Pinus densiflora Community in Chayang-chon Area, Soraksan National Park )
À̰æÀç;ÇѺÀÈ£;ÀÌ¿ÁÇÏ; ¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°úÇдëÇÐ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¼³¾Ç»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ÀÚ¾çõ°è°î Áö¿ª¿¡ ºÐÆ÷ÇÏ´Â ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²ÀÇ »ý½Ä±¸Á¶¿Í ¼öÁ¾°£ »ýÀ°°Å¸®¸¦ ¹àÈ÷±â À§ÇØ ÃÑ 39°³ÀÇ Á¶»ç±¸(10m$ imes$10m)¸¦ ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. TWINSPAN°ú DCA±â¹ýÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²Àº 2°³ÀÇ ±¸ÁýÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾îÁ³´Ù. ±ºÁý IÀº Èä°íÁ÷°æÀÌ 35~70cm, ¼ö°í 9~16m, ¼ö·ÉÀÌ 30~50³â Á¤µµÀÇ ¼Ò³ª¹«°¡ ¿ìÁ¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀÏÁ¤½Ã°£ ÀÌ»ó ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²À¸·Î °è¼Ó À¯ÁöµÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù. ShannonÀÇ Á¾´Ù¾çµµ´Â ±ºÁý II(1.4247)°¡ ±ºÁý I (1.2978)º¸´Ù ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ¼öÁ¾°£ »ýÀ°°Å¸®¸¦ »ìÆìº¸¸é, ±ºÁý I¿¡¼­ ±³¸ñÃþÀº 4.92$pm $2.14m, ±ºÁý IIÀÇ ±³¸ñÃþÀº 2.41$pm $0.97m À̾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ±³¸ñÃþ Èä°íÁ÷°æ°ú »ýÀ°°Å¸®¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è´Â Y(°Å¸®) = 0.06355$ imes $(DBH)+1.51613À̾ú´Ù.
To study vegetation structure and distance between trees of Pinus densiflora forest in Chayang-chon area, Soraksan National Park, thirty-nine plots(10m$ imes$10m) were established. They were classified into two communities by TWINSPAN and DCA technique. In the Community I, P. densiflora(DBH 35~75cm, height 9~16m, age 60~80) dominated in canopy and were predicted to be changed by deciduous broad-leaved trees also. In the Community II, P. densiflora(DBH 9~26.5cm, height 9~16m, age 30~50m) dominated in canopy. It seemed that the community II would maintain P. densiflora community for a long time since P. densiflora dominated in both canopy and understory. Shonnon's diversity index was higher in the community II(1.4247) than in the community I(1.2978). The distantes between canopy trees were 4.92$pm $2.14m in the community I and 2.41$pm $0.97m in the community II. The regression between DBH in canpy and ecological distance was Y(Distance) = 0.06355$ imes $(DBH)+1.51613.
 
Ű¿öµå
Èä°íÁ÷°æ;Á¾´Ù¾çµµ;DCA;DBH;SPECIES DIVERSITY;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.11, no.4, 1998³â, pp.493-505
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199811920719103)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿