¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.20, no.3, 2006³â, pp.319-330
MIA¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °ü±¤.ÈÞ¾ç°ü·Ã ÇÈÅä±×·¥ÀÇ ÀÎÁöÈ¿°ú Æò°¡
( The Multiple Index Approach for the Evaluation of Tourism and Recreation Related Pictograms )
±èÁ¤¹Î;À¯±âÁØ; »óÁö´ëÇб³ °ü±¤ÇкÎ;»óÁö´ëÇб³ °ü±¤ÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÇÈÅä±×·¥(°ø°ø¾È³» ±×¸²Ç¥Áö)Áß °ü±¤°ú ÈÞ¾çȰµ¿¿¡ °ü·ÃµÈ ÇÈÅä±×·¥¿¡ ´ëÇѰø°øÀÇ ÀÌÇØÁ¤µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ÇÈÅä±×·¥ÀÇ ½Äº°°¡´É¼º°ú ÀÎÁöÈ¿°ú¸¦ Ž»öÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ Çѱ¹Ç¥ÁرâÁØÀ¸·Î äÅÃµÈ 300°³ÀÇ ÇÈÅä±×·¥ Áß 25°³ ÇÈÅä±×·¥À» ¿ì¼± Á¶»ç´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© °ü±¤ Àü°ø ´ëÇлý 64¸íÀ» Ç¥º»À¸·Î Multiple Index Approach(MIA)¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ½ÇÇèÁ¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç°á°ú, 25°³ ÇÈÅä±×·¥¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àü¹ÝÀû ÀÌÇØµµ´Â 65.82%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª ÀÎÁö ¼öÁØ¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ÇÈÅä±×·¥º°·Î Â÷À̰¡ ¸¹ÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Á¤´ä·üÀÌ ³ôÀº ÇÈÅä±×·¥ÀÇ °æ¿ì ÁÖ°üÀû È®½Å¼º°ú ÁÖ°üÀû ÀûÇÕ¼º ¸ðµÎ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, ¿À´ä·üÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´ø ÇÈÅä±×·¥ÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ¾çÀÚ ¸ðµÎ ³·Àº¼öÄ¡¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÁÖ°üÀû È®½Å¼º°ú ÁÖ°üÀû ÀûÇÕ¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º ºÐ¼® °á°ú 14°³ÀÇ ÇÈÅä±×·¥ÀÌ ÀÎÁöÈ¿°ú°¡ ³ôÀº ÇÈÅä±×·¥±º¿¡ ¼ÓÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ±× ¿Ü 11°³ ÇÈÅä±×·¥Àº ÇâÈÄ ÇнÀ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÀÎÁöµµ ÁõÁø ³ë·ÂÀ̳ª µðÀÚÀÎÀÇ °³¼±ÀÌ ¿ä¸ÁµÇ´Â ÇÈÅä±×·¥±ºÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÇ¾ú´Ù.
It is imperative that pictograms as pictorial information be empirically tested in order to establish whether the users do indeed associate the appropriate referent in an actual usage situation. The experiment employing the Multiple Index Approach was conducted in a class room with 64 subjects to evaluate tourism and recreation related pictograms. Performance data(hit rate, false alarm and missing value) of 25 pictograms were collected and the average hit rate as a prime index of pictogram associativeness was 65.82%. The matrix analysis showed 14 pictograms were high in subjective certainty and subjective suitability. The other 11, which were low in both criteria may require prior learning or improvement of the pictogram designs to represent their meanings more distinctively.
 
Ű¿öµå
°ø°ø¾È³»;±×¸²Ç¥Áö;½Äº°°¡´É¼º;ÁÖ°üÀû È®½Å¼º;ÁÖ°üÀû ÀûÇÕ¼º;¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º;PICTORIAL INFORMATION;ASSOCIATIVENESS;REFERENT;SUBJECTIVE CERTAINTY;SUBJECTIVE SUITABILITY;MATRIX;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.20, no.3, 2006³â, pp.319-330
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200634742870328)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿