¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.20, no.4, 2006³â, pp.374-390
ÇÏõ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¹«»ý¹°Àû ȯ°æÀÎÀÚ¿Í »ý¹°°úÀÇ »ó°ü¼º - °æ±âÁö¹æÀÇ ÇÏõ»ç·Ê¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î -
( Correlation between Biotic Factor and Abiotic Factor - Focus on the Case Streams in Kyonggi District - )
±èÇýÁÖ;±è¼ÛÀÌ;±èâ¿Ï; ±èÇýÁÖÀÚ¿¬È¯°æ°èȹ¿¬±¸¼Ò;±èÇýÁÖÀÚ¿¬È¯°æ°èȹ¿¬±¸¼Ò;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¹°¸®Àû ±¸Á¶Á¶»ç Ç׸ñ 25°³ Áß¿¡¼­ ÇÏõÀ¯Çü ºÐ·ùôµµ·Î ÀÌ¿ëµÇ´Â 9°³ÀÇ Ç׸ñ°ú ÃâÇöÇÑ Àú¼­»ý¹° ¹× ½Ä¹°°úÀÇ »ó°ü¼ºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú ÇÏ»óÀç·áÀÇ ´Ù¾ç¼º, ÇϵµÀÇ »çÇ༺ Ⱦ´Ü»çÁÖÀÇ ¹ß´ÞÁ¤µµ°¡ »ý¹°ÀÇ ÃâÇö¿¡ ³ôÀº »ó°ü¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¼öÈ­ÇÐÀû ÀÎÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì ÃÑ 12°³ Áß COD³óµµ¸¸ÀÌ Àú¼­»ý¹°ÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¿¡ À¯È¿ÇÑ »ó°ü¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹«»ý¹°Àû ÀÎÀÚ¿Í »ý¹°Àû ÀÎÀÚ¿ÍÀÇ »ó°ü¼º ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­´Â ƯÈ÷ ¸ð·¡ÇÏõ°ú ÀÚ°¥ÇÏõÀÌ ¼­·Î À½°ú ¾çÀÇ ¹æÇâÀ¸·Î »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾î µÎ°³ À¯ÇüÀÇ ÇÏõÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû ±¸Á¶ ¹× »ýÅÂÀû Ư¼ºÀÌ ¼­·Î ¶Ñ·ÇÇÏ°Ô ´Ù¸£´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» Áö½ÃÇϰí ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ºÐ¼®°á°ú´Â »ý¹°¼­½Äó¸¦ °í·ÁÇØ¾ß¸¸ ÇÏ´Â ÇÏõº¹¿øÀ̳ª ÇÏõÀÇ »ýÅÂÀû À¯ÇüºÐ·ù¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÇÏõÆò°¡¿¡µµ Ȱ¿ëµÇ¾îÁú ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
The analysis of correlation between the 9 element (used as the classification standard of stream typology out of the 25 elements pertinent to the survey of hydromorphological structure) and both emerged benthic macroinvertebrate as well as vegetation indicated that the substrate diversity, curvature, and degree of development of the transverse bar had a high correlation with the species composition. Only COD concentration was found to have the statistically significant correlation with the distribution of benthos among the 12 aquatic and chemical elements. Specifically, the analysis of the biotic and abiotic factors in this study indicated that there was a statistically significant correlation between the sand river and cobble river in the positive(+) and negative(-) aspects, suggesting that there is a distinctive difference between the two types of rivers in terms of hydromorphologlcal structure and ecological characteristics. Therefore, the findings of this study imply that the consideration of a biotop is prerequisite for the evaluation of stream status regarding stream restoration or the ecological topology of streams.
 
Ű¿öµå
¹°¸®Àû ±¸Á¶;ÇÏõÀ¯Çü;»ó°ü¼ººÐ¼®;ÇÏ»óÀç·áÀÇ ´Ù¾ç¼º;Ⱦ´Ü»çÁÖ;HYDROMORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE;STREAM TYPOLOGY;CORRELATION ANALYSIS;SUBSTRATE DIVERSITY;TRANSVERSE BAR;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.20, no.4, 2006³â, pp.374-390
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200606142049492)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿