¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.20, no.4, 2006³â, pp.473-481
ÀÚ±â¾È³»½Ä ÇØ¼³ÆÇ ±ÛÀÚÀÇ °¡µ¶¼º°ú °ü½ÉÀ¯µµ, ¼±È£µµ ¹× Ž¹æ°´ÀÇ ÇØ¼³ÆÇ Àб⠱ÇÀ¯Àǵµ¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è
( Relationship between Text Readability of Self-Guided Interpretive Signs and Attraction, Preferences, and Intention to Recommend Reading Signs to Others )
±è»ó¿À; Àü³²´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ ÀÓÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°¡µ¶¼ºÀº ±ÛÀÚÀÇ Àб⠽¬¿òÀÇ Á¤µµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â ôµµ·Î¼­ ÇØ¼³ÆÇÀÇ Á¤º¸Àü´ÞÀÇ È¿°ú¼ºÀ» °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ä¼Ò·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ¿Ô´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÇØ¼³ÆÇÀÇ °¡µ¶¼ºÀÌ Å½¹æ°´ÀÇ °ü½ÉÀ¯¹ß°ú ÇØ¼³ÆÇ Àбâ Çൿ¿¡ ¾î¶»°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´ÂÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â µå¹°´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â °¡µ¶¼º°ú ÇØ¼³ÆÇÀÇ °ü½ÉÀ¯µµ, ¼±È£µµ. ÇØ¼³ÆÇ Àб⠱ÇÀ¯Àǵµ¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ±¸¸íÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼öÁýÀº2003³â 8-11¿ùÁß¿¡ ³»Àå»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿ø ³» ÀÚ¿¬°üÂû·Î Ž¹æ°´ Áß¿¡¼­ ¼±Á¤µÈ ÃÑ 375¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °üÂû·Î ÁÖº¯¿¡ ¼³Ä¡µÈ ÇØ¼³ÆÇ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ³´Ù. ÀÌÁß ÀÌ¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ 350¸íÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀÌ º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÏ¿© ÀÌ¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú, °¡µ¶¼ºÀº °ü½ÉÀ¯µµ, ¼±È£µµ, ÇØ¼³ÆÇ Àб⠱ÇÀ¯Àǵµ¿Í °ü·ÃÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °¡µ¶¼º ÀÌ ³ôÀ¸¸é ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï °ü½ÉÀ¯µµ, ¼±È£µµ, ÇØ¼³ÆÇ Àб⠱ÇÀ¯Àǵµµµ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °¡µ¶¼º°ú ´õºÒ¾î °ü½ÉÀ¯µµ¿Í ¼±È£µµµµ ÇØ¼³ÆÇ Àбâ±ÇÀ¯Àǵµ¿Í °ü·ÃÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¼¼ º¯¼öÁß ¼±È£µµ´Â ÇØ¼³ÆÇ Àб⠱ÇÀ¯Àǵµ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© °¡Àå ³ôÀº ¼³¸í·ÂÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú´Â ÇØ¼³ÆÇÀÇ °¡µ¶¼ºÀ» ÁõÁø½ÃÅ´À¸·Î½á ÇØ¼³ÆÇ Àбâ ÇൿÀÇ Áõ´ë°¡´É¼ºÀ» ½Ã»çÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù.
Readability, an indicator measuring the easiness of reading letters, has been known an important element that determines the communicative effectiveness of the self-guided interpretive signs. However, there are few studies to find out how the readability of the signs influence visitor's attraction and reading behavior of interpretive signs. This study examined the relationship between readability of interpretive signs and attraction, preferences, and intent to recommend reading signs to others. Data were collected from August to November of 2003 at a self-guided trail of Naejangsan National Park, Korea. 350 out of 375 responses from subjects who participated in the questionnaire survey were usable. Results showed that readability of the signs is related with the attraction, preferences, and intention of recommending reading signs to others. The higher the readability of the signs were, the higher the attraction, preferences, and intention of recommending reading signs were. Attraction and preferences were also positively related with intention of recommending reading signs. Preferences better explained intention of recommending reading signs than readability and attraction. These findings suggest that enhancing readability of the signs may lead to higher participation in reading them.
 
Ű¿öµå
±¹¸³°ø¿ø;ÀÚ¿¬°üÂû·Î;NATIONAL PARK;SELF-GUIDED TRAIL;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.20, no.4, 2006³â, pp.473-481
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200606142049996)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿