¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.21, no.1, 2007³â, pp.82-92
¿ï¸ªµµ »ï¸²½Ä»ý°ú ȯ°æ°úÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è
( Vegetation-Environment Relationships in Forest Community of Ulleung Island )
¼Ò¼ø±¸;±è¹«¿­;¹ÚÁ¾¹Î;ÀÌ»óÈ­;¹Ú°ü¼ö;¼ÛÈ£°æ; ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ »ý¹°°úÇкÎ;ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ »ý¹°°úÇкÎ;ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ »ê¸²°úÇкÎ;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ ȯ°æÀÓ»êÀÚ¿øÇкÎ;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ ȯ°æÀÓ»êÀÚ¿øÇкÎ;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ ȯ°æÀÓ»êÀÚ¿øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¿ï¸ªµµÀÇ »ï¸²±º¶ôÀ» ºÐ·ùÇϰí, ½Ä»ý°ú ȯ°æ°úÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇϰíÀÚ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿ï¸ªµµ »ï¸²±º¶ôÀº °õ¼Ö±º¶ô(Pinus thunbergii community), ¼Ò³ª¹«±º¶ô(Pinus densiflora community), Âü½Ä³ª¹«±º¶ô(Neolitsea sericea community), ¼¶À㳪¹«±º¶ô(Pinus parviflora community), ³Êµµ¹ã³ª¹« - ¸¶°¡¸ñ±º¶ô(Fagus multinervis - Sorbus commixta community)À¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÇ¾ú´Ù. ½Ä¹°»çȸÇÐÀû ¹æ¹ý°ú TWINSPAN¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ±º¶ôºÐ·ù´Â ÀÏÄ¡¼ºÀ» º¸À̰í ÀÖ¾î »óÈ£ º¸¿ÏµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. Åä¾çÀÇ È­ÇÐÀû Ư¼ºÀº ±º¶ôº°·Î ¾à°£¾¿ Â÷À̰¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, À¯±â¹°ÇÔ·®, ÀüÁú¼Ò, À¯È¿Àλê, ±×¸®°í ¾çÀ̿ ġȯ¿ë·®Àº ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ »ê¸²Åä¾ç¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Åä¾ç pH´Â 4.66-5.80À¸·Î ¾àÇÑ »ê¼º Åä¾çÀÇ Æ¯Â¡À» ³ªÅ¸³»°í ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, Å伺Àº ¾çÅ䳪 »ç¾çÅä·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. »ï¸²±º¶ô°ú ȯ°æ¿äÀεé°úÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ »ìÆìº¸¸é, ÇØ¹ß°í¿Í ġȯ¼º¾çÀÌ¿Â(Na, K, Ca, Mg), Åä¾ç pH ±×¸®°í Å伺 ÁßÀÇ silt¿Í sand°¡ ±º¶ôÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
The purposes of this study were to classify community and to analyzse vegetation-environment relationships in the forest community of Ulleung Island. The forest community of Ulleung Island was classified into Pinus thunbergii community, Pinus densiflora community, Neolitsea sericea community, Pinus parviflora community, and Fagus multinervis - Sorbus commixta community. Since the results of phytosociological community classification were consistent with that of TWINSPAN, it proved that these two methods could complement when one does a community classification. There was a difference in chemical characteristic of soil among study communities. The community had high soil organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorous, and cation exchange capacity compared to forest soil of Korea. The soil pH ranged from 4.66 to 5.80. The soil texture in the study communities was loam or sandy loam. According to the ordination analysis, elevation, exchangeable Na, K, Ca, Mg, soil pH, and content of sand and silt affect the distribution of community.
 
Ű¿öµå
½Ä¹°»çȸÇÐ;±º¶ôºÐ·ù;ºÐÆ÷¼­¿­¹ý;Åä¾çƯ¼º;PHYTOSOCIOLOGY;TWINSPAN;DCCA ORDINATION;SOIL CHARACTERISTIC;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.21, no.1, 2007³â, pp.82-92
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200716419424019)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿