¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.21, no.5, 2007³â, pp.400-414
»êºÒÁö¿ª ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÑ ½Ä»ýº¹¿ø ¸ðµ¨ °³¹ß
( Development of Ecological Restoration Model Consider Analysis on the Vegetation Structure of Burned Area )
±èÁ¤È£;À̼öµ¿; µ¿¹®°Ç¼³(ÁÖ)Ưȭ»ç¾÷ºÎ;ÁøÁÖ»ê¾÷´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â »êºÒÇÇÇØÁö¿ª ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÑ »ýÅÂÀû ½Ä»ýº¹¿ø ¸ðµ¨À» Á¦½ÃÇϰíÀÚ 2000³âµµ¿¡ »êºÒÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿© »ç¹æ»ç¾÷Â÷¿ø¿¡¼­ À㳪¹«, ÀÚÀÛ³ª¹« µîÀ» Á¶¸²ÇÑ ¿µÀλê ÀÚ¶ô Àϴ븦 ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ý Á¶»ç´ë»óÁö·Î ¼±Á¤ÇÑ $1,152,404.3m^2$ Áß »êºÒÁö¿ªÀº 69.2%À̾ú°í ÀÌÁß °ü¸ñ½£ÀÌ 24.67%·Î °¡Àå ³Ð¾ú´Ù. ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ýÀ¯Çü°ú »êºÒÇÇÇØ»óŸ¦ °í·ÁÇØ ¼³Á¤ÇÑ 27°³ Á¶»ç±¸(´ÜÀ§¸éÀû $100m^2$)¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú 10°³ ±º¶ôÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾ú´Ù. »êºÒÁö¿ªÀº °ü¸ñÃþ ½Ä»ýÀÌ ¿ìÁ¡ÇÏ¿´°í À㳪¹«±º¶ô, ±¼Âü³ª¹«±º¶ô, °õ¼Ö±º¶ô, Á¹Âü³ª¹«±º¶ô, ÀÚÀÛ³ª¹«±º¶ôÀ¸·Î ³ª´µ¾îÁ³°í ºñ»êºÒÁö¿ªÀº ¼Ò³ª¹«±º¶ô »ó¼ö¸®³ª¹«±º¶ô, Á¹Âü³ª¹«±º¶ô, ½Å°¥³ª¹«-Á¹Âü³ª¹«±º¶ô, ÀÚÀÛ³ª¹«±º¶ôÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾ú´Ù. Á¾´Ù¾çµµ´Â »êºÒÁö¿ªÀÌ $0.3679{sim}0.5907$·Î ºñ»êºÒÁö¿ª $0.5728{sim}0.8865$º¸´Ù ³·¾Ò´Ù. ÃâÇöÁ¾¼ö´Â »êºÒÁö¿ªÀÌ $5{sim}8$Á¾À¸·Î ºñ»êºÒÁö¿ª $8{sim}12$Á¾º¸´Ù ÀÛ¾ÒÀ¸¸ç °³Ã¼¼ö´Â »êºÒÁö¿ª ($156{sim}465$°³Ã¼)ÀÌ ºñ»êºÒÁö¿ª($61{sim}227$°³Ã¼)º¸´Ù ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. $100m^2$´ç ÃþÀ§º° »ýÀ°¹Ðµµ ºÐ¼®°á°ú ±³¸ñÃþ¿¡¼­´Â ½Å°¥³ª¹«°¡ $1{sim}8$ÁÖ, Á¹Âü³ª¹«°¡ $3{sim}5$ÁÖ, ¾Æ±³¸ñÃþ¿¡¼­´Â Á¹Âü³ª¹« $2{sim}4$ÁÖ, ½Å°¥³ª¹« 1ÁÖ µîÀÌ ÃâÇöÇÏ¿´´Ù. Åä¾çÀÇ °æ¿ì »êºÒÁö¿ª pH°¡ 5.45·Î ºñ»êºÒÁö¿ª pH 5.25º¸´Ù ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ½Ä»ýº¹¿ø¸ðµ¨Àº õÀÌ Áß°£´Ü°è¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â ½Å°¥³ª¹«-Á¹Âü³ª¹« Áß°æ¸ñ±º¶ôÀ» ¸ðµ¨·Î ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿© ½ÄÀçÁ¾°ú ½ÄÀç¹Ðµµ ±×¸®°í ½ÄÀç¸ðµ¨À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.-${alpha}$·Î Ç¥ÇöµÇ´Â ÇöÁ¸·®Àº ±ÔÁ¶·ù »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ¿ÍÆí¸ðÁ¶·ù¿Í ħÆí¸ðÁ¶·ù¿Í °ü°è°¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¿°ºÐ, ±Ô»ê¿°°ú Àλ꿰ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Á¶»ç±â°£À» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ÃÖ±Ù 6³â µ¿¾ÈÀÇ ±â¿ÂÀÇ »ó½Â¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼ö¿ÂÀÇ »ó½ÂÀº µ¿°è ÀûÁ¶¸¦ ¹ß»ý½ÃŰ´Â ¿øÀÎÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, µ¿°è ÀûÁ¶¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿µ¾ç¿° °í°¥°ú Ãá°èÀÇ °­¿ì·® °¨¼Ò¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿µ¾ç¿° °ø±ÞÀÇ Á¦ÇÑÀº ¸¶»ê¸¸¿¡¼­ »ó½ÀÀûÀ¸·Î ¹ß»ýµÇ´Â Ãá°è ÀûÁ¶ÀÇ ¹ß»ýÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´À» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. °á°úÀûÀ¸·Î 2004³âµµÀÇ ÀüÇüÀûÀÎ ´ë¹ß»ý ¾ç»óÀÇ º¯È­´Â ¼ö¿ÂÀÇ »ó½Â°ú °­¿ì·®ÀÇ °¨¼Ò°¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÃÆÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÃßÁ¤µÈ´Ù.»ç¼±Ä¡·á´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¸ñÀû¿¡ ºÎÇÕµÉ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó »ç¿ë¹æ¹ý ¶ÇÇÑ ºñ±³Àû ¿ëÀÌÇÏ´Ù°í »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù ÀÌ °á°úµéÀ» Á¾ÇÕÇØº¼ ¶§, Msx2¿Í Dlx5 À¯ÀüÀÚ´Â µÎ°³°ñ°ú µÎ°³ºÀÇÕºÎÀÇ ¼ºÀå¹ßÀ°°úÁ¤¿¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ´ã´çÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, BMP signalingÀº ÀÌ µÎ Àü»çÁ¶ÀýÀÎÀÚµéÀ» Á¶ÀýÇÏ¹Ç·Î½á µÎ°³°ñÀÇ °ñÈ­°úÁ¤°ú µÎ°³ºÀÇÕºÎÀÇ ÇüŹ߻ý ¹× À¯Áö¿¡ °ü¿©Çϰí ÀÖÀ½À» Á¦½ÃÇØÁÖ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ BMP signaling¿¡ specific downstream geneÀÎ Msx2 ¹× Dlx5ÀÇ ¹ßÇö¾ç»óÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â °ñ¾Æ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ ºÐÈ­½Ã À̵é À¯ÀüÀÚ°¡ °¢°¢ÀÇ µ¶Æ¯ÇÑ ±â´ÉÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÀ½À» ½Ã»çÇØÁÖ°í ÀÖ´Ù.0.370{sim}0.442$ »çÀÌ·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À¯ÀÇÈ®·ü 0.01ÀÌÇÏ·Î Á¶»çµÈ ¼öÄ¡´Â Cholesterol°ú ALT°£, LDH¿Í Platelet, Creatinine°£, Platelet¿Í BUN°£, Na¿Í K¼öÄ¡°£ À̾úÀ¸¸ç »ó°ü°è¼ö´Â $0.531{sim}0.866$»çÀÌ·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 5. ³ó¾çȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ÀÇ °Ë»çÄ¡°£ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú À¯ÀÇÈ®·üÀÌ 0.05ÀÌÇÏÀÎ ¼öÄ¡µéÀº CRP¿Í Neutrophil°£ À̾ú°í »ó°ü°è¼ö´Â 0.422À̾ú°í À¯ÀÇÈ®·üÀº 0.020À¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ
This study has analyzed the vegetation structure to suggest a vegetation ecological restoration model by using the case of the afforestation for erosion control area with Pinus koreaiensis and Betula platyphylla, etc., on the hills of the Young-in mountains after its great fire in 2000. Of the area having a dimension of $1,152,404.3m^2$ selected as a survey site for the existing vegetation, the forest fire area accounted for 69.2% among which, brushwoods accounted the most for 24.67%. As a result of analysis of the 27 surveyed unit plots[unit dimension: $100m^2$] set up in consideration of the existing vegetation pattern and damaged state from the forest fire, the surveyed area was classified into 10 communities. Shrub layer's vegetation was found to be dominant in forest fire areas and the surveyed sites were classified into 5 plant communities, i.e. P. koraiensis community, Quercus variabilis community, P. thunbergii community, Q. serrata community, B. platyphylla community in forest fire areas, while non-forest fire areas were classified into 5 plant communities, such as P. densiflora community, Q. acutissima community, Q. serrata community, Q. mongolica-Q. serrata community, B. platyphylla community. Species diversity of forest fire areas was $0.3679{sim}0.5907$ and that of non-forest fire areas was $0.5728{sim}0.8865$. In addition, the number of the species in the forest fire areas was $5{sim}8$ and that of non-forest areas was $8{sim}12$; however, the population of forest fire areas$(156{sim}456)$ was higher than that of non-forest fire areas$(61{sim}227)$. In the analysis of growth density per layer$[of;100m^2]$, there appeared $1{sim}8$ trees of Q. mongolica and $3{sim}5$ trees of Q. serrata in the upper layer species; $2{sim}4$ trees of Q. serrata and one tree of Q. mongolica in the canopy layer. As for the characteristics of soil, acidity of forest fire areas was pH 5.45 and that of non-forest fire was pH 5.25. By setting up the middle D.B.H range of Q. mongolica-Q. serrata community as the vegetation restoration model, planting species, planting density and planting models are suggested.
 
Ű¿öµå
õÀÌ;Åä¾ç»êµµ;Á¾´Ù¾çµµ;½ÄÀç¹Ðµµ;SUCCESSION;SOIL pH;SPECIES DIVERSITY;PLANTING DENSITY;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.21, no.5, 2007³â, pp.400-414
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200703534259484)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿