¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.2, no.1, 1988³â, pp.1-8
Ä¡¾Ç»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ »ï¸²±ºÁý ±¸Á¶ -±¸·æ»ç-ºñ·ÎºÀÁö¿ªÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î-
( Structure of Forest Communities in Chiak Mountain National Park - Case Study of Guryong Temple - Birobong Area - )
¹ÚÀÎÇù;À̰æÀç;Á¶Àçâ; ¼øÃµ´ëÇÐ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ¹®¸®°ú´ëÇÐ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ Á¶°æ½ÇÅ¿¬±¸½Ç;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Ä¡¾Ç»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø³» ÁÖ ÀÌ¿ë´ë»óÁöÀÎ ±¸·æ»ç-ºñ·ÎºÀ ÀÏ´ë »ï¸²±ºÁýÀÇ ±¸Á¶¸¦ ºÐ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Àΰ£ °£¼·ÀÇ Á¤µµ ¹× ȯ°æÁ¶°ÇÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© 4°³ Á¶»çÁö¸¦ ¼±Á¤Çϰí ÃÑ 45°³ Á¶»ç±¸¸¦ ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àΰ£ÀÇ °£¼·ÀÌ ½ÉÇÑ ÀúÁö´ë °è°îºÎÀÇ °æ¿ì ºñ±³Àû õÀ̴ܰ谡 ³·Àº ¼Ò³ª¹«°¡ ¿ìÁ¡Á¾À̾úÀ¸¸ç(Á¶»çÁö I ), ºñ±³Àû Àΰ£ÀÇ °£¼·ÀÌ ½ÉÇÑ °íÁö´ë °è°îºÎ(Á¶»çÁö II)¿Í ±Ù·¡¿¡ ÀÔ»ê±ÝÁö°¡ µÈ °è°îºÎ(Á¶»çÁö III )¿¡¼­´Â ÃþÃþ³ª¹«. ÁÖµî»ê·Î°¡ ÀÖ´Â °íÁö´ë ´É¼±ºÎ(Á¶»çÁö IV)¿¡¼­´Â ½Å°¥³ª¹«°¡ ¿ìÁ¡Á¾À̾ú´Ù. Á¾´Ù¾ç¼ºÀº Á¶»çÁö III, II, I, IVÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î ³ô¾Ò´Âµ¥, À̰ÍÀº ´É¼±ºÎÀÎ Á¶»çÁö IV¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÒ ¶§, Àΰ£ °£¼·ÀÇ Á¤µµ¿Í ¿ªÀÇ °ü°è¿´´Ù. Á¾»ó°ü¼º ºÐ¼®°á°ú ¼Ò³ª¹«´Â Ÿ¼öÁ¾°ú À¯ÀÇÀûÀÎ ºÎÀÇ »ó°üÀ» °¡Áö´Â °æ¿ì´Â ºñ±³Àû ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸³ª Á¤ÀÇ »ó°üÀ» ÀÎÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì´Â ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾ÊÀ½À¸·Î½á ´ëü·Î ¼ø¸²ÀÇ ÇüŸ¦ ÀÌ·ç°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Ä¡¾Ç»ê ±¸·æ»ç °è°îÀÇ DCA¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ordinationºÐ¼®°á°ú Ç¥°í ¹× ȯ°æÀÎÀÚ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ 3°³ÀÇ ±ºÁýÀ¸·Î ³ª´­ ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, stand ordination¿¡ µû¶ó ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý, ¼Ò³ª¹«-½Å°¥³ª¹«, ¼Ò³ª¹«-°¥Âü³ª¹«, °¥Âü³ª¹«-¼­¾î³ª¹«, ÃþÃþ³ª¹«-±îÄ¡¹Ú´Þ³ª¹«, ÃþÃþ³ª¹« ±ºÁýÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾ú´Ù. õÀ̰úÁ¤Àº ´É¼± ¹× Áߺ¹ºÎ¿¡¼­´Â ¼Ò³ª¹«$longrightarrow$½Å°¥³ª¹« ¹× Âü³ª¹«·ù, ÆÏ¹è³ª¹«$longrightarrow$¼­¾î³ª¹«·Î, °è°îÀúÁö´ë¿¡¼­´Â ¼Ò³ª¹«$longrightarrow$Âü³ª¹«·ù$longrightarrow$ÃþÃþ³ª¹«, ±îÄ¡¹Ú´Þ³ª¹«·Î ÁøÇàµÇ´Â °úÁ¤À̾ú´Ù.
To investigate the forest structure of Guryongsa-Birobong area in Mt. Chiak, four districts were selected and forty-five plots were set up at the districts. The leading dominant species of District I, the valley forest in which users' density was very high. was Pinus densiflora. That of District II, the valley forest in which users' density was high. and Districs III, the valley forest in which entering was restricted recently. was Comus controversa. That of District III, the ridge forest in which users' density high, was Quercus mongolica. Species diversities of District I, II, III, and IV were 1.3252, 1.3736, 14421, and 1.2546, respectively. DCA ordination were showed that successional trends of tree species seem to be from Pinus densiflora through Quercus spp. to Carpinus laxtflora in ridge and midslope forest and from Pinus densiflora through Quercus spp. to Comtus controversa and Carpinus cordata.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.2, no.1, 1988³â, pp.1-8
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198811922082262)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿