¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.2, no.1, 1988³â, pp.19-36
Ä¡¾Ç»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶
( Edge Vegetation Structure in Chiak Mountain National Park )
¿À±¸±Õ;±ÇÅÂÈ£;Á¶ÀÏ¿õ; ¼­¿ï´ëÇпø ´ëÇпø;´ë±¸´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ´ëÇпø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Ä¡¾Ç»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶ ¹× ÃâÇö¼öÁ¾À» ¹àÈ÷±â À§ÇØ 1988³â 7¿ù-9¿ù »çÀÌ¿¡ ÇöÁöÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÇÑ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ¼ö°ü¼±Çü, ¼ö°£¼±Çü ¹× ÀüÁøÇü ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ½Ä»ýÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ¿¡¼­ »ï¸²³»ºÎ·ÎÀÇ °Å¸®¿¡ µû¸¥ ÃâÇö¼öÁ¾µéÀÌ ¼ö°üÃþÀ§º° »ó´ë¿ìÁ¡Ä¡ º¯È­°¡ ¹æÀ§¿Í ±âÁ¸ »óÃþ¿ìÁ¡¼öÁ¾º°·Î ´Þ¶ú´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ³²»ç¸éÀÇ ¼Ò³ª¹«¸² ³»ºÎ¿¡¼­ ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ ¾ç¼öµéÀÌ ¿ì¼¼ÇÏ°Ô ÃâÇöÇϰí ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ºÏ»ç¸é °è·ù ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ¿¡¼­´Â È£½À¼º¼öÁ¾µéÀÌ ¾ç¼öµé°ú ÇÔ²² ¿ì¼¼ÇÏ°Ô ÃâÇöÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ï¸²ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ·ÎºÎÅÍ »ï¸²³»ºÎ·ÎÀÇ °Å¸®°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ ¼ö·Ï ¼ö°üÃþÀ§º° Á¾¼ö ¹× °³Ã¼¼ö, Á¾´Ù¾çµµ ¹× »óÀ̵µ´Â °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³ÂÀ¸¸ç, ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ±íÀÌ´Â 15-20m·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ȯ°æÀ¯Çüº° °ü¸ñÃþ°ú ÀÓ»óÃþÀÇ ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ¿ìÁ¡¼öÁ¾Àº °íµµ¿Í ÁöÇüÀû À§Ä¡ Áï, °è°îºÎ, ´É¼±, Á¤»óºÎ¿¡ µû¶ó ´Þ¶úÀ¸¸ç ƯÈ÷, Á¤»óºÎÀÇ ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ ¿ìÁ¡¼öÁ¾Àº µ¶Æ¯ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í °íµµ, ÁöÇüÀû À§Ä¡ ¹× ¹æÀ§°¡ ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ½Ä»ý°£ÀÇ À¯»çµµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °íµµ, ¹æÀ§ ¹× ÁöÇüÀûÀ§Ä¡¿¡ µû¶ó ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ ¼öÁ¾µéÀÇ ÃâÇöºóµµ°è±ÞÀÌ ´Þ¶úÀ¸¸ç, º´²É³ª¹«´Â ÀüÁö¿ª¿¡¼­ ³ôÀº ÃâÇöºóµµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³ÂÀ¸¸ç º´²É³ª¹«, ½Å°¥³ª¹«, ¹°Çª·¹³ª¹«, ´Ù·¡, »êµþ±â, ¼Ò³ª¹«, »ý°­³ª¹«, ³ë¸°À糪¹«, µÎ¸¨³ª¹«´Â ´ëüÀûÀ¸·Î ÀüÁö¿ª¿¡¼­ ÁÖ¿¬ºÎ ¼öÁ¾À¸·Î ÃâÇöÇß´Ù.
To investigate edge vegetation structure and edge species in Chiak Mountain National Park, field survey was executed from July to September, 1988. Canonpy drip-line type, cantilevered type and advancing type of edge vegetation were observed on site. The relative importance values of major species in each crown layer were changed along distance from edge to forest interior differently by aspect and present tree layer vegetation. Especially light-oriented edge species as codominant species were observed in Pinus densiflora forest interior at south slope and moisture - oriented species as codominant species were observed with light-oriented species in north edge beside torrential stream. No. of species and individuals by crown layer, species diversities and dissimilarities were decreased according to the distance from edge to forest interior, and edge depth was estimated as 15-20m. Dominant species of edge in shrub and ground layer were different by altitude and topographic locations; valley, ridge, summit and edge species at summit were not observed at other area. Floristic similarities between edge vegetations at different environments were affected by altitude, aspect and topographic location. Frequency classes of edge species were different by aspect, altitude and topographic location. Weigela subscssilis showed high frequency class in all environment conditions and Quercus mongolica, Lindera obtusiloba, Symplocos chinensis for, pilosa, weigela subscssilis, Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Actinidia arguta, Rubus crategifolius. Pinus densiflora, Aralia elata etc, were observed as edge species at all environmental conditions, respectively.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.2, no.1, 1988³â, pp.19-36
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198811922082281)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿