¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.2, no.1, 1988³â, pp.37-49
Ä¡¾Ç»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ À̿밴ÀÌ ¾ß»ýÁ¶·ùÀÇ ¼­½Ä¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( User¡Çs Effects on Avifauna in Chiak Mountain National Park )
±èÁؼ±;±è°©ÅÂ;°ø¿µÈ£;°í»óÇö; ¼øÃµ´ëÇÐ ÀÓÇаú;»óÁö´ëÇÐ ÀÓÇаú;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ¾ßÁ¶È¸;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Ä¡¾Ç»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î À̿밴ÀÌ ¾ß»ýÁ¶·ùÀÇ ¼­½Ä¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¹àÈ÷±â À§ÇÏ¿© ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. Á¶»ç¸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© °íµµ 500m ÀÌÇÏÀÇ ÁÖµî»ê·Î, ºÎµî»ê·Î. µî»ê±ÝÁö±¸¿ª°ú 500m ÀÌ»óÀÇ ´É¼±ºÎ¿Í °è°îºÎÀÇ ÁÖµî»ê·Î µî ÃÑ 5°³ÀÇ Á¶»çÁö¸¦ ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿©, 1988³â 5¿ùºÎÅÍ 10¿ù »çÀÌ 3ȸ¿¡ °ÉÃÄ Line transect¹ýÀ¸·Î Á¶»çÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ±× °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. Ä¡¾Ç»ê Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ Á¶»ç±â°£ µ¿¾È °üÂûµÈ Á¶·ù´Â ÅÔ»õ 22Á¾. ¿©¸§Ã¶»õ 13Á¾, °Ü¿ïö»õ 5Á¾, ³ª±×³×»õ 4Á¾ÀÇ ÃÑ 44Á¾ 613°³Ã¼·Î Æò±Õ¼­½Ä¹Ðµµ´Â 2.96¸¶¸®/haÀ̾ú´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä ¿ìÁ¡Á¾Àº ¹Ú»õ, ºÓÀº¸Ó¸®¿À¸ñ´«ÀÌ, °ïÁÙ¹ÚÀÌ. ¼è¹Ú»õ. Áø¹Ú»õÀÇ ¼øÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç ÃâÇö Á¾¼ö ¹× Á¾´Ù¾çµµ´Â À̿밭µµ°¡ ³·Àº Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ º¸´Ù À̿밭µµ°¡ ³ôÀº ÁÖµî»ê·Î¿¡¼­ ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, ÁÖµî»ê·Î¿¡¼­µµ À̿뷮ÀÌ ¸¹Àº ¿©¸§Ã¶¿¡ ÇöÀúÈ÷ ³·¾Ò´Ù. ±×·¯³ª À¯»çµµÁö¼ö´Â À̿밭µµ º¸´Ù´Â ¹°¸®Àû ¼­½Äȯ°æÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ´Þ¶óÁö´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¾ß»ýÁ¶·ùÀÇ Æò±Õ ÃâÇöºóµµ´Â 6.77ȸ/kmÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, À̿밭µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ»ó°ú °°ÀÌ ¾ß»ýÁ¶·ùÀÇ Á¾¼ö. Á¾´Ù¾çµµ ¹× ÃâÇöºóµµ´Â À̿밴¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ¾Ç¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, À̿밴ÀÌ ÁýÁßÇÏ´Â ÁÖµî»ê·Î¿¡¼­ ´õ¿í ½É°¢ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÀÌ¿ëÀÚÀÇ ¿µÇâÀÌ Å« ÁÖµî»ê·Î¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© ±¹¸³°ø¿ø³» À¯ÈïÁß½ÉÀû Ȱµ¿Á¦ÇÑ ¹× ¹ø½Ä±âÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëÅëÁ¦µî Àû±ØÀûÀÎ ¾ß»ýÁ¶·ùÀÇ º¸È£´ëÃ¥ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ¿´´Ù.
This study was conducted to investigate the user's effects on the avifauna in Chiak Mountain National Park. The survey was carried over 5 districts which were 3 main trail (valley) by line transect method from May to October 1988. The observed birds were 44 species and 613 individuals. these consist of 22 species for residents, 13 species for summer visitor, 5 species for winter visitor and 4 species for passage migrant. The average density of birds was 2.96 ea/ha, and main dominant species were Panus minar, Paradoxomis webbiana fulvicanda, Panus palustris hellmayri and Parus ater amurensis in order. The observed frequency of wild-birds was 6.77 times/km in average. No. of species, species diversities and observed frequency were lower in main trail of high user's density than sub trail and closed trail, especially in summer. But similarity indices were affected by inhabitation environments than user's density. Therefore, from now, in Chiak Mountain National Park management, the enjoyment oriented activities will be regulated and the control of trail use on main trail are necessary during breeding periods for wild birds protection.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.2, no.1, 1988³â, pp.37-49
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198811922082291)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿