¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.3, no.1, 1989³â, pp.81-94
°¡¾ß»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ µî»ê·Î ¹× ¾ß¿µÀå ÈѼհú ÁÖº¯ ȯ°æ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À̿뿵Çâ
( Trail and Campground Deteriorations and Use Impact on their Natural Environment in Mt. Kaya National Park )
±ÇÅÂÈ£;¿À±¸±Õ;Á¤³²ÈÆ; ´ë±¸´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ;È£³²´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°¡¾ß»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø µî»ê·Î ¹× ¾ß¿µÀåÀÇ ÈѼհú ÁÖº¯ ÀÚ¿¬È¯°æ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À̿뿵ÇâÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇϱâ À§ÇØ 1989³â¿¡ Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. µî»ê·ÎÆø, ³ªÁö³ëÃâÆø ¹× ÃÖ´ë ±íÀÌ´Â À̿밭µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷À̰¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú°í, Àüü 51°³ Á¶»çÁö Á¡¿¡¼­ °üÂûµÈ ÈѼÕÇüÅ´ ¸Å¿ì ´Ù¾çÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÈÑ¼ÕµÈ ÁöÁ¡ÀÇ µî°£·Î »óÅÂÁß ÃÖ´ë±íÀÌ¿Í µî»ê·Î¹°¸Å´Â °ÇÀüÇÑ ÁöÁ¡ÀÇ »óÅÂ¿Í À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. µî»ê·ÎÁÖº¯ Åä¾ç ¹× ½Ä»ýÀÎÀÚÀÇ º¯È­°æÇâÀ» À̿뿵ÇâÀÇ ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¶ó ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í µî»ê·ÎÁÖº¯ºÎ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â À̿뿵ÇâÀº ¾à 15m¿¡ À̸£´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ¾ß¿µÀåÀÇ ÈѼÕÀº ½É°¢ÇÏ¿© ÇÇÇØµµ 5µî±ÞÀÇ ºñÀ²ÀÌ ¾à 36%À̾ú°í 3µî±ÞÀÌ»óÀÎ Áö¿ªµµ ¾à 69%¿¡ ´ÞÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¾ß¿µÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëȰµ¿ÀÌ ¼ö¸ñÀÇ Á÷°æ»ýÀåÀ» Å©°Ô ÀúÇØÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç. Á¾±¸¼ºÀÇ ÀÌÁúÈ­¸¦ ±Ø½ÉÇÏ°Ô ÁøÇà½Ã۰í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¾ß¿µÀåÀÇ À̿밭µµÀÇ Â÷À̳ª À̿뿵ÇâÀÇ ¹üÀ§¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇϴµ¥ ÀûÇÕÇÑ Åä¾ç ¹× ½Ä»ýÀÎÀÚµéÀ» È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, À̿밣¼·ÀÇ ¿µÇâ¹üÀ§´Â ¾à 50mÀ̾ú´Ù. ¾ß¿µÇàÀ§¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³»¼º¼öÁ¾Àº ¹°Çª·¹³ª¹«, °³¿Ì³ª¹«, ³ë¸°À糪¹«, ±¹¼ö³ª¹« µîÀ̾ú´Ù.
Use impacts to trail and campground deteriorations and their changes of natural environment were studied in Mt. Kaya National Park in 1989. The entire width, bare width and maximum depth of trail as the trail condition were significantly greater on the more heavily used trail. Deteriorations of trail which were surveyed at the total of 51 were significantly different from those of non-deteriorated points. The changes of soil and vegetation of trailsides were not found at a uniform tendency but could be more clearly grouped by the types of user's disturbance, and use impact on trailside had reached 15m inside of forest. Percentage of area for Class 5 in campsite was about 36% and about 69% of campsite area was more severe than Class 3. Recreational activities retarded the diameter growth of trees in campsite and accelerated the different composition of species. Soil and vegetative factors adapted to understand the difference of use amount and the realm of use impact could be sorted. The realm influenced by user's disturbance was about 50m from the core of campsite. Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Rhus trichocarpa, Symplocos chinensis for. pilosa and Stephanandra incisa were considered as the tolerant species to user's impact.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.3, no.1, 1989³â, pp.81-94
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198911922082393)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿