¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.6, no.1, 1992³â, pp.72-85
ÇѶó»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ À̿밴 Çàźм®
( The Analysis of visitor¡Çs Behavior in Hallasan National Park )
À̰æÀç;ÃÖ¼ÛÇö;±è¼±Èñ; ¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ¹®¸®°ú´ëÇÐ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÇѶó»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ À̿밴 Çàźм®Àº 1990³â 9¿ù ÇÑ´Þ°£ ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¹æ¹®Æ¯¼º¿¡¼­ ÀÚ¿¬ÁöÇâÀûÀÎ ¸ñÀûÀÌ 68.9%¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, µ¿¹ÝƯ¼º¿¡¼­´Â ¼Ò¼Ó´Üü°¡ 36.3%, Ä£±¸°¡ 29.8%À̾ú°í, µ¿¹ÝÀÚ¼ö´Â 2-3¸íÀÌ 23.0%, 12¸í ÀÌ»óÀÌ 29.7%¿´´Ù. Ȱµ¿Æ¯¼º¿¡¼­ ½Ä»çÁغñ´Â µµ½Ã¶ôÀÌ 62.7%·Î ¸Å¿ì ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ¾²·¹±âó¸® ¹æ¹ýµµ °¡Áö°í ÇÏ»êÈÄ Ã³¸®°¡ 69.6%À̾ú´Ù. °æ°ü¸¸Á·µµ´Â ÃÖ´ëÄ¡¸¦ 5·ÎÇÏ¿© 3.98ÀÇ ³ôÀº ¸¸Á·µµ·ü º¸¿´À¸³ª ÆíÀͽü³Àº ºÒ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ Àüü¸¸Á·µµ´Â 3.43À¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ¿ëÀÚÀÇ Àǰ߿¡¼­ ¼±Âø¼øÀÔÀå, ¿©¾àÁ¦µµµµÀÔ, ´ë±Ô¸ð ´ÜüÀÌ¿ëÁ¦ÇÑ¿¡´Â ´ëü·Î ¹Ý´ëÇÏ¿´À¸³ª ÀÚ¿¬È޽ijâÁ¦ µµÀÔ¿¡´Â Âù¼ºÀ²ÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ƯÈ÷, Ž¹æ°´¾È³»¼Ò´Â À̿밴ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëÀÌ °ÅÀÇ ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª ÀÌ¿ëÀÚÁß µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù°í ´äº¯ÇÑ »ç¶÷µéÀÌ ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ¼³¹®¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½É¸®Àû ¸¸Á·µµÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÇÏ¿© °¢ Ç׸ñµéÀÇ ¿äÀκм®À» Á÷°¢È¸Àü¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½Ç½ÃÇÑ °á°ú, ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î 4°³ÀÇ ¿äÀÎÀÌ ÃßÃâµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, factor 1Àº ÆíÀͽü³Àû ¿äÀÎ, factor 2´Â »çȸÀû ¿äÀÎ, factor 3´Â ÀÌ¿ëÇàÅ¿äÀÎ, factor 4´Â ÀÚ¿¬Àû ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î ÀûÀçµÇ¾ú´Ù. Àüü ¹× Áö¿ªº° ȸ±ÍºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÑ °á°ú, ÀüüÁö¿ª¿¡¼­ Àüü¸¸Á·µµ(Y)¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Ç׸ñÀº û°áµµ, °æ°ü¼º, ¾ÈÀüµµ, ¾²·¹±âÅë ¼ö, È¥Àâµµ ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù.
The analysis of visitor's behavior in Hallasan National Park was executed for a month in september, 1990. In the characteristics of trip purpose, the nature-oriented motive was 68.9% of the total. And in the characteristics of the accompanied, the ratio of such items as company, friends,2-3 persons and above 12 persons was generally high. The ratio of lunch box was 62.7£¥ and the item of bring back waste treatment was 69.6% in the characteristic of activity. The degree of landscape satisfaction was 3.98 and comparatively high on considering the maximum degree of 5.0, but in the degree of facility, the degree of dissatisfaction was high. Therefore the degree of total satisfaction was 3.43. In the opinion of users, the entrance by order of arrival, the adoption of reserved system and the limitation of the entrance of a group were gen- orally objected but the adoptation of nature rest-rotation system was comparatively assented Specially, visitor center was rarely used but many visitor who has attended there positively think about it. In factor analysis, 4 factors were extracted. Facilitate, social. user behavior and natural property were the most affecting factor to psychological satisfaction test. Multiple regression results showed that cleanness, land-scape, safety, no. of wastebasket and crowdness items affected the total satisfaction variable in total and local area.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.6, no.1, 1992³â, pp.72-85
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199211922082709)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿