¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.9, no.1, 1995³â, pp.15-29
ºÏÇÑ»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿ø ÁÖ¿ä 5°³ °è°îÀÇ ½Ä¹°±ºÁý±¸Á¶
( Plant Community Structure for Five Major Valleys in Bukhansan National Park )
À̰æÀç;Á¶¿ì;Ȳ¼­Çö; ¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ¹®¸®°ú´ëÇÐ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇб³;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇб³;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ºÏÇÑ»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿ø ¿ìÀ̷ɰè°î, ÇÏ·çÀç°è°î, ±¸±â°è°î, ¼ÛÃß°è°î µµºÀ»ê°è°îÀÇ ½Ä¹°±ºÁý±¸Á¶ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÏ¿© °¢ Áö¿ª¿¡ 38, 40, 26, 28, 36°³¾¿ÀÇ Á¶»ç±¸(Á¶»ç±¸¸éÀû 100$m^2$)¸¦ ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ°í ½Ä»ýÁ¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Á¶»çµÈ ÀڷḦ Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿© TWINSPAN¿¡ ÀÇÇÑclassification°ú DCA¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ordination±â¹ýÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àüü Á¶»ç±¸´Â TWINBPAN¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ¼­¾î³ª¹«±ºÁý (I), ½Å°¥³ª¹«±ºÁý (II), ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý (III), ½Å°¥³ª¹«-¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý(IV), ½Å°¥³ª¹«-Á¹Âü³ª¹«-»êº¢³ª¹«±ºÁý (V), ½Å°¥³ª¹«-±¼Âü³ª¹«±ºÁý (¥µ), ¾Æ±î½Ã³ª¹«-»ó¼ö¸®³ª¹«±ºÁý (¥¶), ¸®±â´Ù¼Ò³ª¹«-Á¹Âü³ª¹«±ºÁý(¥·), ½Å°¥³ª¹«-±¼Âü³ª¹«-Âʵ¿¹é³ª¹«±ºÁý(¥¸) µî 9°³ÀÇ ±ºÁýÀ¸·Î ºÐ¸®µÇ¾ú´Ù. º» Á¶»çÁöÀÇ ÃµÀ̰迭Àº ÀÚ¿¬¸²ÀÇ ±³¸ñÃþ¿¡¼­´Â ¼Ò³ª¹«$longrightarrow$½Å°¥³ª¹«, Àΰø¸²¿¡¼­´Â ¾Æ±î½Ã³ª¹«, ¸®±â´Ù¼Ò³ª¹«$longrightarrow$»ó¼ö¸®³ª¹«, ¹°Çª·¹³ª¹« ¼øÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, ¾Æ±³¸ñÃþ°ú °ü¸ñÃþ¿¡¼­´Â ¹ÙÀ§¸»¹ßµµ¸®, °³¿Ì³ª¹«, »êöÂß, Âüȸ³ª¹«$longrightarrow$´ç´Üdz, ÇԹڲɳª¹«, »ý°­³ª¹« ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù. ±â¿ÕÀÇ ¿¬±¸¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© Àΰ£ÀÇ °£¼·°ú ´ë±â¿À¿°À¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ Åä¾ç»ê¼ºÈ­ µîÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ õÀ̰¡ ÁøÇàµÇÁö ¸øÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÃßÃøµÇ¾ú´Ù.
To investigate plant community structure of Uiryung valley, Harujae valley, Kugi valley, Songchu valley, Tobongsan valley in Bukhansan National Park, each thirty eight, forty, twenty six. twenty eight, thirty six plots (plot size 100$m^2$) were set up and surveyed. The surveyed data were integrated and classification by TWINSPAN and DCA ordination techniques were applied to the study area. The plant community were divided into nine groups in seventy nine plots by TWINBPAN and the dividing groups were Carpinus laxiflora community(I), Quercus mongolica community(II), Pinus densiflora community(III), Q. mongolica-P. densiflora community(IV) Q. mongolica-Q. serrata- Prunus sargentii community(V), Q. mongolica Q. variabilis community(¥µ), Robinia pseudoacacia-Q. serrata community(¥¶). P. rigida-Q. serrata community(¥·), Q. mongolica- Q. variabilis- Styrax obassia community(¥¸). So the successional trends of tree species at the natural forest seem to be from P. densiflora to Q. mongolica and at the artificial forest seem to be from R. pseudoacacia, P. rigida to Q. acutissima, Fraxinus rhynchophylla in canopy layer And in the subtree and shrub layer, it wag supposed that from Deotzia prunifolia, Rhus trichocarpa. Rhododendron yedoense var. poukhasleilse, Euonymus oxyphyllous to Magnolia sieboldii, Acer psuedo-sieboldianum, Lindera obtusiloba. In comparing successional trends with past study, it was postulated that successtion is not progressed by human disturbance and soil acidification by the air pollution.
 
Ű¿öµå
ºÏÇÑ»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿ø;õÀ̰迭;½Å°¥³ª¹«;TWINSPAN;DCA;BUKHANSAN NATIONAL PARK;SUCCESSIONAL TRENDS;Quercus mongolica;TWINSPAN;DCA;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.9, no.1, 1995³â, pp.15-29
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199511922083498)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿