|
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.19, no.2, 2005³â, pp.150-161
|
¾ß»ýµ¿¹°ÀÇ Çൿ±ÇÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ ¼³¾Ç»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿ø°ú ¿À´ë»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿ø°£ ¼½ÄÁö ¿¬°á
( Habitat Connectivity between Soraksan and Odaesan National Parks with a Consideration of Wildlife Home Range ) |
°Çý¼ø;±èÁø¿µ;¹Ú°æ; ¼º½Å¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ »ý¹°Çаú, ¼º½Å¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ±âÃʰúÇבּ¸¼Ò;¼º½Å¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ »ý¹°Çаú;¼º½Å¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ Áö¸®Çаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
¼³¾Ç»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø°ú ¿À´ë»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀº 20.7km ¶³¾îÁ® ÀÖÀ¸³ª ¹éµÎ´ë°£ÀÇ Á߽ɿ¡ À§Ä¡Çϱ⠶§ ¹®¿¡ ¾ß»ýµ¿½Ä¹°ÀÇ ¼½ÄÁö¿Í ÀÌÅëÅë·Î·Î¼ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù ±×·¯³ª Çù¼ÒÇÑ Å©±â, Á¶°¢È, Áö ¸®Àû °Ý¸®¿Í °°Àº °æ°üÀû Ư¼º¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀÌ µÎ ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀº ÀûÀýÇÑ »ýÅÂÀû ±â´ÉÀ» ´ÙÇÏÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â GIS ±â¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© µÎ ±¹¸³°ø¿ø°ú Àα٠¼ÓÃʽÃ, °í¼º±º, ÀÎÁ¦±º, ¾ç¾ç±º, ȫõ±º ÀÏ´ë ÃÑ ¸éÀû $4573.6 km^2$ÀÎ Áö¿ªÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Á¶°¢È Çö»óÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ À°½Äµ¿¹°ÀÌ¸ç º¸È£Á¾À¸·Î ÁöÁ¤µÈ »íÀÇ ¼½ÄÁöÁ¶°Ç¿¡ ºÎÇÕÇÏ´Â °æ°üÁ¶°¢À» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ°í »íÀÇ À̵¿ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ °æ°üÁ¶°¢µéÀÇ ¿¬°á¸Á°ú ¿¬°áÁöÁ¡À» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´Ù¾çÇÑ µµ·Î¿Í ÀÎÀ§Àû ½Ã¼³·Î ÀÎÇØ Á¶»çÁö¿ªÀº ÃÑ 24,701°³ÀÇ °æ°üÁ¶°¢À¸·Î ´ÜÀýµÇ¾î ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ½Ä»ý°ú ÃÖ¼Ò ¼½ÄÁö¸éÀû, Á¶°¢°£ °Å¸®¿Í °°Àº ¼½ÄÁö Á¶°ÇÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ ÀÌ Áß 39°³ °æ°üÁ¶°¢ÀÌ »íÀÇ ÀáÀç¼½ÄÁö·Î ¼±ÅõǾú´Ù. ³ª¾Æ°¡ °è¹æ»ê°ú ¹æÅ»ê ÀÏ´ëÀÇ 3°³ Á¶°¢ÀÌ ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ Á¶°¢È¿Í °í¸³È¸¦ ¿ÏȽÃų ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿¬°á¸ÁÀÇ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î È®ÀεǾú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¶ÇÇÑ Á¡ºÀ»ê°ú ¹æÅ»ê ÀÏ´ëÀÇ Á¶°¢ÀÌ »íÀÌ µÎ ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀ¸·Î ºÐ»êÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â, °ø±ÞÁö·Î¼ ÀÛ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» º¸¿© ÁÖ¾ú´Ù. °ÅÀÇ ¸ðµç ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÌ Á¶»çµÈ µÎ ±¹¸³°ø¿ø°ú À¯»çÇÑ °æ°üÀû ¹®Á¦¸¦ °¡Áö°í Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ¾ß»ý »ý¹°À» º¸ÀüÇϱâ À§Çؼ´Â ±¹¸³ °ø¿ø°ú Àα٠Áö¿ª¿¡¼ÀÇ Á¶°¢È Çö»ó°ú °æ°üÁ¶°¢ÀÇ ¿¬°á¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °úÁ¦°¡ ¸Å¿ì ½Ã±ÞÇÏ´Ù°í »ç·áµÈ´Ù. |
|
Soraksan National Park and Odaesan National Park, that are 20.7 km apart, should play an important role as habitats and corridors for wildlife because they are located in the center of Baekdudaegan. However, landscape features such as small area, fragmentation, and geographic isolation seem to impede the proper ecological functions of these two national parks. Using GIS technique, we examined the pattern of fragmentation in these two national parks and adjacent regions (Sokcho-si, Goseong-gun, Inje-gun, Yangyang-gun, and Hongcheon-gun) encompassing a total of $4573.5km^2$ in area. We then selected the patches suitable for an endangered carnivorous species, leopard cat, based on habitat conditions, and identified the network and stepping stone among patches to enable leopard cats to migrate. Diverse roads and artificial facilities in the study area generated a total of 24,701 patches: 39 patches among these were selected as potential habitats upon considering the habitat condition such as vegetation types and minimum area for leopard cat. Three patches nearby Gyebangsan and Bangtaesan were identified as a potential network center to relieve the effects of fragmentation and isolation of the two national parks. Our results also showed that patches containing Jombongsan and Bangtaesan would act as a source patch from there leopard cats can disperse to both national parks. It is an urgent task to identify the pattern of fragmentation and the connectivity between patches in national parks and adjacent areas for wildlife conservation because almost all national parks confront land- scape problems similar to the two national parks examined in this study. |
|
Ű¿öµå |
º¸ÀüÁö¿ª;»í;Á¶°¢È;¿¬°á¼º;CONNECTIVITY;CONSERVATION ZONE;FRAGMENTATION;GIS;LEOPARD CAT; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.2, 2005³â, pp.150-161
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200502637405644)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|