¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.19, no.3, 2005³â, pp.312-326
¼­¿ï½Ã ³²»ê¼Ò³ª¹«¸² »ýÅÂÀû Ư¼º ¹× 15³â°£(1990$sim$2004³â) ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶ º¯È­ºÐ¼®
( Ecological Characteristics and Change for fifteen Years$(1990$sim2004)$ of Plant Community Structure of the Pinus densiflora S. et Z. Forest in Namsan, Seoul )
À̰æÀç;±èÁ¤È£;ÇѺÀÈ£; ¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°úÇдëÇÐ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°úÇבּ¸¿ø;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°úÇдëÇÐ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ³²»ê ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²ÀÇ »ýÅÂÀû Ư¼º ¹× ±âÁ¸ ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²¿¡ ´ëÇÑ 15³â°£ ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶ º¯È­ ½ÇŸ¦ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ¼Ò³ª¹«¸² º¸Àü ¹× »ýÅÂÀû °ü¸®ÀÇ ±âÃÊÀÚ·á Á¦°øÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼Ò³ª¹«¸² ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ý Á¶»ç°á°úÃÑ6°³ À¯Çü°ú 15°³ ¼¼ºÎÀ¯ÇüÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾ú´Ù. ±âÁ¸ ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²³»¿¡ 44°³ Á¶»çÁö(´ÜÀ§¸éÀû: $400m^2$)¸¦ ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿© TWINSPANºÐ¼®°á°ú 5°³ ±º¶ô À¯ÇüÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ±³¸ñÃþ¿¡¼­´Â ¼Ò³ª¹«, ¾Æ±³¸ñÃþ¿¡¼­´Â ¶§Á׳ª¹«,°ü¸ñÃþ¿¡¼­´Â ±¹¼ö³ª¹«, Áø´Þ·¡ µîÀÌ ¿ìÁ¡Á¾À̾ú´Ù. »þ³íÀÇ Á¾´Ù¾çµµ´Â $0.5980sim1.1485$À̾úÀ¸¸ç ÃâÇöÁ¾¼ö´Â $17sim22$Á¾À̾ú´Ù. 15³â°£ ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶ º¯È­ºÐ¼®°á°ú ¼Ò³ª¹«$(I.P.:;77.9% ightarrow50.6%)ÀÇ ¼¼·ÂÀº Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î °¨¼ÒÇϰí ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç ¶§Á׳ª¹«$(I.P.:;5.3% ightarrow22.6%), »êº¢³ª¹«$(I.P.:;1.5% ightarrow9.2%),±¹¼ö³ª¹«$(I.P.:;3.5% ightarrow7.7%)ÀÇ ¼¼·ÂÀºÁõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ´ÜÀ§¸éÀû $2,000m^2$¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î »þ³íÀÇ Á¾ ´Ù¾çµµ´Â 1.1719¿¡¼­ 0.8829, Á¾¼ö´Â 34Á¾¿¡¼­ 21Á¾À¸·Î º¯È­ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
The purpose of this study is to provide data for conservation and ecological management of Pinus densiflora forest by analyzing ecological characteristics and the change of Pin us densiflora community structure for fifteen years in Namsan(Mt.). The actual vegetation of Pinus densiflora forest was divided into total six types and fifteen detail types. According to the results of TWINSPAN analysis of Pinus densiflora forest, there were fourty-four plots(unit: 400 m') and it was classified into five community types. The dominant species were Pinus densiflora in canopy layer, Styrax japonica in the understory layer and Stephanandra incisa with Rhododendron mucronujatum in the shrub layer. The index of shannon's diversity was from 1.5980 to 1.1485 per $400m^2$and the range of species number was from seventeen to twenty-two. As a result of the change of Pin us densinora forest structure, the importance percentage(1.p.) of Pinus densi. nora$(I.P.:;77.9% ightarrow50.6%) was decreased, Styraxjaponica$(I.P.:;5.3% ightarrow22.6%), Prunus sargen $(I.P.:;1.5% ightarrow9.2%) and Stephanandra incisa$(I.P.:;3.5% ightarrow7.7%) were increased for fifteen years. Based on standard of $2,000m^2$unit area, shannon's diversity changed 1.1719 into 0.8829 and species number changed thirty-four into twenty-one.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ý;»ó´ë¿ìÁ¡Ä¡;»þ³íÀÇ Á¾´Ù¾çµµ;½Ä»ý±¸Á¶º¯È­;ACTUAL VEGETATION;IMPORTANCE PERCENTAGE;SHANNON`S DIVERSITY;CHANGE OF PLANT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.3, 2005³â, pp.312-326
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200504840776586)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿