¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.19, no.3, 2005³â, pp.287-298
Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ ÀÚ¿¬»ýÅÂ°è º¸ÀüÀ» À§ ÇÑ Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥ ü°è±¸Ãà
( Construction of System on Assessment Indicators for Conservation of Sustainable Natural Ecosystem )
À¯ÁÖÇÑ;Á¤¼º°ü;¿ÀÁ¤ÇÐ; ÃæÃ»ºÏµµ¼ö¸ñ,»ê¾ßÃÊ¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø »ê¸²»ýŰú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ ÀÚ¿¬»ýŰ踦 °´°üÀûÀ̰í ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÁöÇ¥±ºÀ» ±¸ÃàÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±¹Åä ¹× ÀÚ¿¬È¯°æ º¸ÀüÀÇ ±âÃÊÀÚ·á Á¦°ø°ú ´õºÒ¾î ȯ°æÁ¤Ã¥ ¼ö¸³À̳ª ÀÔ¾ÈÀ» À§ÇÑ ¹æÇâÁ¦½Ã¸¦ À§ÇØ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. »ý¹°Àû ¿äÀÎ, ¹«»ý¹°Àû ¿äÀÎ, ÁúÀû ¿äÀÎ, ±â´ÉÀû ¿äÀÎ µî 4°³ÀÇ Æò°¡Ç׸ñÀ» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥´Â ¹Ðµµ, ÃÑ Áú¼Ò·®, Çì¸Þ·Îºñµî±Þ, ÀçÈ­»ý»êµî56°³·Î ÃßÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æò°¡Ç׸ñ°ú Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥°¡ ½Å·Ú°è¼ö 0.6 ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î È®ÀÎµÇ¾î ¼³¹®Áö ¼³°è¿¡´Â Å« ¹®Á¦°¡ ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥ÀÇ »ó°üºÐ¼® °á°ú, »ý¹°Àû ¿äÀÎÀÇ °æ¿ì ±ºµµ¿Í ¿ìÁ¡µµ, ¹«»ý¹°Àû ¿äÀÎÀÇ °æ¿ì Å伺°ú ¹æÀ§, ÁúÀû ¿äÀÎÀÇ °æ¿ì ±ÍÈ­À²°úÀÚ¿¬ÆÄ±«µµ, ±â´ÉÀû ¿äÀÎÀÇ °æ¿ì»ê»çÅ ¹æÁö¿ÍÅä¾çħ½Ä ¹æÁö°¡ ³ôÀº»ó°ü¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ´ÙÂ÷¿ø ôµµ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Â÷¿ø°áÁ¤À» ¼öÇàÇÑ °á°ú, ½ºÆ®·¹½º°ªÀº $0.042sim0.133$, ÀûÇÕµµ Áö¼ö´Â 0.9 ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª Åë°èÀû ¹®Á¦´Â ¹ß»ýÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. XÃàÀÇ °æ¿ì »ý¹°Àû ¿äÀÎÀº ±¸Á¶, ¹«»ý¹°Àû ¿äÀÎÀº °üÁ¡, ÁúÀû ¿äÀÎÀº ±¸¼º, ±â´ÉÀû ¿äÀÎÀº ´ë»óÀ̰í YÃàÀº ÇüÅÂ, ¹üÀ§, ±¸Á¶, Ȱµ¿À¸·Î Çü¼ºµÇ¾ú´Ù.
This study was carried out to offer the raw data on conservation of land and natural environment by constructing groups of indicators to objectively and rationally assess the sustainable natural ecosystem and present the direction for establishing and planning the environmental policy. There were selected that four assessment items were biotic, abiotic, qualitative, and functional factor. And there were extracted fifty-six indicators including density, total nitrogen, hemeroby degree, and goods production. As assessment items and indicators were over 0.6, the design of questionnaire showed no great problem. In the results of correlation analysis of assessment indicators, sociality and dominance was highly correlative in biotic factor, soil property and aspect in abiotic factor, naturalized and urbanized index in qualitative factor, and protection of landslide and soil erosion were too correlative. In the results of deciding the dimension by multidimensional scaling, as stress values were from 0.042 to 0.133, index of fit over 0.9, there no statistical problems. In case of X axis, biotic factor was structure, viewpoint in abiotic factor, composition in qualitative factor, and object in functional factor, and Y axis was shaped Into form, range, structure, and activity.
 
Ű¿öµå
»ý¹°Á¾´Ù¾Ó¼º;ȯ°æÁ¤Ã¥;»ó°ü¼º;´ÙÂ÷¿øÃ´µµ;BIODIVERSITY;ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY CORRELATION;MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.3, 2005³â, pp.287-298
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200504840776460)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿