¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.1, no.1, 1987³â, pp.46-65
ºÏÇÑ»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ Åä¾ç ¹× ½Ä»ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À̿뿵Çâ ¹× ½É¸®Àû ¼ö¿ë·ÂÀÇ ÃßÁ¤
( Recreation Impacts on Soil and Vegetation and Estimation of Psychological Carrying Capacity in Mt. Bukhan National Park )
À̰æÀç;±èÁؼ±;¿ìÁ¾¼­; ¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ¹®¸®°ú´ëÇÐ;¼øÃµ´ëÇÐ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ Á¶°æ½ÇÅ¿¬±¸½Ç;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ºÏÇѻ걹¸³°ø¿ø¿¡¼­ À̿밴¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÀÚ¿¬È¯°æÀÇ º¯È­ ¹× À̿밴 ½É¸®Á¶»ç¸¦ ¼öÇàÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ¾ß¿µÀå ¹× ÇÇÅ©´Ð Àå¼Ò 18°³¼Ò¿¡ Á¶»ç±¸¸¦ ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 15°³¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â ÀÚ¿¬È¯°æÆÄ±«Á¶»ç¸¦ ÇÏ¿´°í, 3°³¼Ò(´ëµ¿¹®Áö¿ª, ºÏÇÑ»êÀåÁö¿ª, Àμö»êÀåÁö¿ª)¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â Æø10mÀÇ belt transectÀ» ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ¿© À̿밴¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Åä¾ç¼ºÁú ¹× ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, 3°³Àå¼Ò¿¡¼­ ¼³¹®À» ÅëÇØ À̿밴½É¸®¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. TransectÁ¶»çÁö¿¡¼­ ȯ°æÇÇÇØ°¡ ½ÉÇÑ Áß½ÉÁö¿¡¼­ ½£¼ÓÀ¸·Î °Å¸®°¡ ¸Ö¾îÁü¿¡ µû¶ó Åä·®°æµµ, 100$m^2$´ç ¼ö¸ñ°³Ã¼¼ö, ÇÏÃþ Ãʺ»ÃþÀÇ, Çǵµ À¯»çµµÁö¼ö´Â ȸ±Í°ü°è°¡ ¼º¸³µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¾ß¿µÀåÁ߽ɿ¡¼­ ½£¼ÓÀ¸·Î 100~130m±îÁö Àΰ£¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Åä¾ç ¹× ½Ä»ýÀÇ ¹øÈ­°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Àΰ£°£¼·¿¡ ³»¼ºÀÌ °­ÇÑ ¼öÁ¾Àº ÃʷϽθ®, ±¹¼ö³ª¹«, ´Ù·¡, ³ë¸°À糪¹«À̾ú°í, ¾àÇÑ ¼öÁ¾Àº ¹°Çª·¹³ª¹«, ÆÏ¹è³ª¹«, Áø´Þ·¡¿´´Ù. ¼³¹®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ½É¸®ÀûÀÎ ¸¸Á·µµÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÇÏ¿© °¢ Ç׸ñµéÀÇ ¿äÀκм®À» Á÷°¢È¸Àü¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ½Ç½ÃÇÑ °á°ú, ºÏÇÑ»êÀÇ ÇÇÅ©´ÐÀå¼Ò¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Â À̿밴ÀÇ ½É¸®Àû ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ °¡Àå Å©°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °Í(Factor I )Àº ¹°¸®Àû ÀÎÀÚ·Î È­Àå½Ç, ¾²·¹±âÅë, À½·á¼ö¿¡ °üÇÑ º¯·®ÀÌ ³ô°Ô ºÎ°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °Í(Factor II )Àº »çȸÀû ÀÎÀÚ·Î À̿밴ÀÇ È¥Àâµµ, ¼ÒÀ½Á¤µµ, ÁÖº¯È¯°æÀÇ º¸Àü¼ºÀÌ ³ô°Ô ºÎ°¡µÇ¾î ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ½É¸®ÀûÀÎ ¼ö¿ë·ÂÀ» ÃßÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú 25$m^2$/ÀÎ À̾ú´Ù.
This study was excuted to measure the user's impact area of the Bukhan Mountain National Park. Eighteen sites of the campsite and the picnic area were sample to measure the impact rating of soil and vegetation. And three belt transects were sampled to analyze soil properties and vegetational change by the user's impact. Also user's psychology was investigated through questionnaires with the visitor and 726 answers were collected from May to June in 1987. The regression equation was significant between the distance and the soil hardness. individual number per 100$m^2$, herb coverage and similarity index from the center of picnic area to the non-use site. The tolerant tree against user's impact are Lespedza maximowiczii. Stephanandra insica, Actinidia arguta Symplocos chinensis for. pilosa and the sensitive trees were Fraxinus rhy chophylla Sorbus alnifolia. and Rhodadendron mucronulatun. The facilities factor and social factor are the most affecting factors to User's psychology by the varimax rotated factor analysis. The carrying capacity of the picnic area was 25$m^2$ per man by the degree of psychological satisfaction.
 
Ű¿öµå
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.1, no.1, 1987³â, pp.46-65
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO198711922082231)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿