|
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.20, no.2, 2006³â, pp.159-169
|
³»Àå»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿ø ÀÚ¿¬°üÂû·ÎÀÇ ÀÚ±â¾È³»½Ä ÇØ¼³ÆÇ µðÀÚÀÎ ¼Ó¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á߿䵵-¼ºÃëµµ ºÐ¼®
( Importance-Performance Analysis on Design Attributes of Self-Guided Interpretive Signs in the Nature Trail of Naejangsan National Park ) |
±è»ó¿À; Àü³²´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ ÀÓÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
ÇØ¼³ÆÇÀº ÀÚ±â¾È³»½Ä ÇØ¼³¿¡¼ ÈçÈ÷ ÀÌ¿ëµÇ´Â Á¤º¸Àü´Þ ¸Åü·Î¼ ÇØ¼³È¿°úÀÇ ±Ø´ëȸ¦ À§Çؼ´Â ÇØ¼³ÆÇ°ú À̸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇϴ Ž¹æ°´¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇØ°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â Á߿䵵-¼ºÃëµµ ºÐ¼®(Importance-Performance Analysis: IPA)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ž¹æ°´ÀÇ Àα¸»çȸÇÐÀû Ư¼º°ú ¹æ¹®ÇàÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÚ±â¾È³»½Ä ÇØ¼³ÆÇÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä µðÀÚÀÎ ¼Ó¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Çö °ü¸®»óÅÂÀÇ Æò°¡¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© º¸´Ù È¿°úÀûÀÎ ÇØ¼³ÆÇ °ü¸®¸¦ À§ÇÑ ±âÃÊÀڷḦ ¾ò±â À§ÇØ ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÚ·á¼öÁýÀº 2003³â 8-9¿ùÁß ³»Àå»ê ±¹¸³°ø¿ø ³» ÀÚ¿¬°üÂû·Î Ž¹æ°´À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ÀÌ·ç¾î Á³À¸¸ç, ÃÑ 276¸íÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀÌ º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ºÐ¼®¿¡ ÀÌ¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼±Á¤µÈ 30°³ ¼Ó¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ IPA °á°ú, ¿©¼º(23.3%)ÀÌ ³²¼º(13.3%)º¸´Ù, Àú¿¬·ÉÃþ(43.3%)ÀÌ °í¿¬·ÉÃþ(0.0%)º¸´Ù, °íÇз ±×·ì(36.7%)ÀÌ ÀúÇз ±×·ì(0.0%)º¸´Ù, Áß±×·ì(33.3%)ÀÌ ´ë±×·ì(10.0%)À̳ª ¼Ò±×·ì(16.7%)º¸´Ù, ¾Æµ¿µ¿¹Ý ±×·ì(66.7%)ÀÌ ¾Æµ¿ºÎµ¿¹Ý ±×·ì(20.0%)º¸´Ù ´õ ¸¹Àº ÇØ¼³ÆÇ µðÀÚÀÎ ¼Ó¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ³ôÀº Á߿䵵¿Í ³·Àº ¼ºÃëµµ¸¦ º¸¿© ³ôÀº '¿ì¼±½ÃÁ¤ ÇÊ¿ä(Concentrate Here: CH)' Ç׸ñÀ²À» ³ªÅ¸³»´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ¾Æµ¿µ¿¹Ý ±×·ìÀº °¡Àå ³ôÀº '¿ì¼±½ÃÁ¤ ÇÊ¿ä(CH)' Ç׸ñÀ²À» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ Å½¹æ°´À» °í·ÁÇÑ ÇØ¼³ÆÇ ´ÙÀÚÀÎÀÇ Çʿ伺À» ½Ã»çÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Ç¥ÁØÈµÈ ÇØ¼³ÆÇ µðÀÚÀÎ Ç׸ñÀÇ °³¹ßÀ» ÅëÇØ¼ ÀÚ¿¬°üÂû·ÎÀÇ ÇØ¼³ÆÇ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ IPA ¹× ¿©Å¸ Æò°¡¼öÇàÀÇ ½Å·Ú¼º°ú È¿À²¼ºÀ» ±â´ëÇÒ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù. |
|
Interpretive sign is a communication medium that is often used in self-guided interpretation. Understanding interpretive signs and their users is important to maximize the effectiveness of interpretation. This study evaluated design attributes of interpretive signs by visitor's personal characteristics and visiting patterns using Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA). Data were collected from August to September of 2003 at the self-guided trail in Naejangsan National Park, Korea. Visitors using the trail participated in a questionnaire survey, and a total of 276 subiects was used for data analysis. The IPA results showed that female(23.3%) than male(13.3%), low age group(43.3%) than middle(0.0%) and high age group(0.0%), higher education group(36.7%) than lower education group(0.0%), medium size group(33.3%) than large(10.0%) or small group(16.7%), 'with child' group(66.7%) than 'without child' group(20.0%) rated higher importance and lower performance on more design attributes of the interpretive signs. These groups also showed higher rate of 'Concentrate Here(CH)' attributes that require urgent improvement. The 'with child' group showed the especially high rate of 'CH' attributes. The results suggest that interpretive signs need to be designed considering diverse user groups. It is also necessary to develop some standardized items of the sign design attributes for more efficient and reliable implementation of IPA and other evaluative works. |
|
Ű¿öµå |
ÀÚ±â¾È³»½Ä ÇØ¼³;ÇØ¼³È¿°ú;Àα¸»çȸÇÐÀû Ư¼º;¹æ¹®ÇàÅÂ;SELF-GUIDED INTERPRETATION;EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERPRETATION;VISITOR'S PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS;VISITING PATTERNS; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.20, no.2, 2006³â, pp.159-169
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200633242253199)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|