¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.22, no.5, 2008³â, pp.544-550
¼ö¼­°ïÃæÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¿øÁÖõ ¼ö¼­»ýÅÂ°è °Ç°­µµ Æò°¡
( Health Assessment of Aquatic Ecosystem for Wonju Stream Using the Composition of Aquatic Insects )
ÃÖÁرæ;½ÅÇö¼±;¿À»ç¹« ¹ÌŸ¹«¶ó;±è¼÷Á¤; »óÁö´ëÇб³ »ý¸í°úÇаú;½Ã°¡Çö¸³´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°úÇבּ¸°ú;½Ã°¡Çö¸³´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ°úÇבּ¸°ú;°æºÏÀü¹®´ëÇÐ º¸°ÇÇàÁ¤°ú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â 2004³â 5¿ùºÎÅÍ 2004³â 11¿ù±îÁö ÃÑ 4ȸ Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¼ö¼­°ïÃæÀº °úº° »ý¹°Áö¼ö(FBI)¿Í ¹°¸®Àû ¼­½Äȯ°æ(PHA)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¿øÁÖõÀÇ °Ç°­µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿øÁÖõ 9°³ ÁöÁ¡À» ÅëÇØ ÃâÇöÇÑ ¼ö¼­°ïÃæÀº ÃÑ 8¸ñ 37°ú 62¼Ó 92Á¾À̾ú´Ù. °úº°»ý¹°Áö¼öÀÇ °æ¿ì ÁöÁ¡ 1, 2, 3¿¡¼­ $4.55{sim}4.82$·Î °¡Àå °Ç°­ÇÑ ÇÏõ»ýŰ踦 À¯ÁöÇϰí ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î È®ÀεǾú´Ù. ¹°¸®Àû ¼­½Äȯ°æ°ú °úº°»ý¹°Áö¼ö °£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è´Â ÁöÁ¡ 2°¡ °¢°¢ 100, 4.82ÀÇ °ªÀ¸·Î °¡Àå ÁÁÀº ¼­½Äȯ°æÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÁöÁ¡ 7°ú 9´Â 45, 6.17°ú 6.97·Î °¡Àå ³·Àº ¼­½Äȯ°æÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾î ¹°¸®Àû ¼­½Äȯ°æÀÇ °³¼±ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¹°¸®Àû ¼­½Äȯ°æ°ú °úº°»ý¹°Áö¼ö´Â ¼­·Î ¿ªÀÇ »ó°ü¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
This study conducted a survey on the ecosystem of Wonju stream from May until November in 2004 and made an health assessment of Wonju stream using family biotic indices(FBI) and physical habitat assessment(PHA) of the aquatic insects. Through this survey, aquatic insects covering 8 orders, 37 families, 62 genuses, and 92 species were observed at 9 stations along Wonju stream. In terms of family biotic indices, it was confirmed that station 1,2 and 3 were maintaining the healthiest stream ecosystem with the value ranging from 4.55 to 4.82. In addition, station 2 was found to have the best habitat environment in the correlation between physical habitat assessment and family biotic indices with its value of 100 and 4.82, respectively. However, station 7 and 9 showed the lowest habitat environment with the value of 45, 6.17 and 45, 6.97, respectively. posing the need for improvement in PHA; further, station 7 and 9 showed inverted correlationship between PHA and FBI.
 
Ű¿öµå
°úº°»ý¹°Áö¼ö;¹°¸®Àû ¼­½Äȯ°æ;ÇÏõ»ýŰè;FAMILY BIOTIC INDEX;PHYSICAL HABITAT ASSESSMENT;STREAM ECOSYSTEM;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.22, no.5, 2008³â, pp.544-550
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200803657006805)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿