|
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.22, no.5, 2008³â, pp.536-543
|
¹Ý´Þ°¡½¿°õ ÇÇÇØ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸»ó ¸¸Á·µµ ¿¬±¸
( The Study on Satisfaction of the Damage Compensation Caused by the Released Asiatic Black Bear ) |
±èº¸Çö;±è¿ë±Ù;¾çµÎÇÏ;;À̰æÀç; ±¹¸³°ø¿ø°ü¸®°ø´Ü ¸êÁ¾À§±âÁ¾º¹¿ø¼¾ÅÍ;¼¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°úÇдëÇÐ;±¹¸³°ø¿ø°ü¸®°ø´Ü ¸êÁ¾À§±âÁ¾º¹¿ø¼¾ÅÍ;·¯½Ã¾Æ ±Øµ¿°úÇоÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì ¿ì¼ö¸®½ºÅ©º¸È£±¸;¼¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°úÇдëÇÐ;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Áö¸®»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ÀÏ¿ø¿¡ ¹æ»çÇÑ ¹Ý´Þ°¡½¿°õ(Ursus thibetanus ussuricus)ÀÌ À¯¹ßÇÑ ÇÇÇØ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸»ó ¸¸Á·µµ¸¦ »ìÆìº¸°í, Áö¿ªÁֹΰúÀÇ °¥µî°ü¸® À§ÇÑ ±âÃÊ ÀڷḦ Á¦°øÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ 2004³âºÎÅÍ 2007³â±îÁö ¹Ý´Þ°¡½¿°õÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÇÇÇØ¸¦ ¹Þ°í º¸»óÀ» ¹ÞÀº 93¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 2007³â 6¿ù${sim}$12¿ù¿¡ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç°á°ú ÇöÀçÀÇ ÇÇÇØº¸»óÇÁ·Î±×·¥¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¸Á·µµ´Â 5Á¡ ôµµ»ó Æò±Õ $3.14{pm}0.85$Á¡À¸·Î º¸Åë¼öÁØÀ̾ú´Ù. º¸»ó¸¸Á·µµ´Â ¼Òµæ¼öÁØ, º¹¿ø»ç¾÷ Âù¼º ¿©ºÎ, º¸»ó±Ý¾×, º¸»óÀýÂ÷ µîÀÇ ¿äÀΰú À¯ÀÇÇÑ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÇÇÇØº¸»ó½ÉÀÇÀ§¿øÈ¸¸¦ ÅëÇÑ º¸»ó¹æ¾È¿¡´Â ºñ±³Àû ±àÁ¤Àû(Æò±Õ $3.3{pm}0.9$Á¡)À̾úÀ¸³ª, ´Ù¸¥ ¾ß»ýµ¿¹°°ú µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ±âÁØÀÎ ÇÇÇØ¾×ÀÇ 80% ¼öÁØ¿¡¼ º¸»óÇÏ´Â ¹æ¾È¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼´Â ºÎÁ¤Àû(Æò±Õ $2.6{pm}1.11$Á¡)À̾ú´Ù. |
|
This study was carried out to review the satisfaction with compensation for damage caused by the released Asiatic Black Bears into the whole area of Jirisan National Park and to offer basic data for reasonable conflict management with local community. A questionnaire survey was conducted from Jun. 2007 to Dec. 2007 on 93 subjects who got their compensations for the bear damage from 2004 until 2007. The results stayed at a middle level of satisfaction with the proper damage indemnity program with as mean $3.14{pm}0.85$ points on the basis of 5 point scale. The satisfaction with compensation was found to have a significant correlation with the factors, such as income levels, whether to agree to restoration project, compensation money and compensation procedures. The compensation plan through the Animal Damage Compensation Consultation Committee was accepted positively(mean: $3.3{pm}0.9$); however, to the compensation plan for the 80% compensation of actual amounts of bear damage, was acknowledged negatively(mean: $2.6{pm}1.11$). |
|
Ű¿öµå |
Áö¸®»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø;ÇÇÇØº¸»óÇÁ·Î±×·¥;°¥µî°ü¸®;¼³¹®Á¶»ç;JIRISAN NATIONAL PARK;COMPENSATION PROGRAM;CONFLICT MANAGEMENT;QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.22, no.5, 2008³â, pp.536-543
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200803657006804)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|