¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.23, no.4, 2009³â, pp.309-316
ÈÞ¾çÁö¿ªÀÇ Á¶¿ì Æò°¡±âÁØ ¼³Á¤À» À§ÇÑ ½Ã°¢¸ÅüÀÇ È°¿ë½Ã ¿òÁ÷ÀÓÀÇ È¿°ú
( Effects of Movement When Using Visual Media to Determine Encounter Standards1a )
±è»ó¿À;; Àü³²´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ ÀÓÇаú;¿À·¹°ï ÁÖ¸³´ëÇб³ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÈÞ¾çÁö¿ªÀÇ Æò°¡±âÁØ ¼³Á¤À» À§ÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ½Ã°¢¸ÅüÀÇ È°¿ë°¡´É¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ±âÁØÆò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ ½Ã°¢ ¸ÅüÀÇ À¯¿ë¼ºÀº ½Ã°¢¸Åü°¡ ¾ó¸¶³ª Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ÇöÀå »óŸ¦ ¹Ý¿µÇϴ°¡¿¡ ´Þ·ÁÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â Á¤Àû À̹ÌÁö¿Í µ¿Àû À̹ÌÁö¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »êÁ¤µÈ Á¶¿ì±âÁØÀ» ºñ±³ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¿òÁ÷ÀÓÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸´ë»óÁö´Â ¹«µî»êµµ¸³°ø¿ø ³» Á߸Ӹ® Áö¿ªÀ̾ú´Ù. ÃÑ 50¸íÀÇ ´ëÇлýÀÌ ½ÇÇè½Ç Á¶»ç¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Photoshop°ú Flash ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Á¦ÀÛµÈ Á¤ÀûÀ̹ÌÁö¿Í µ¿Àû À̹ÌÁöÀÇ Çã¿ëµµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç°á°ú, Á¤Àû À̹ÌÁö¿Í µ¿Àû À̹ÌÁö °£¿¡ ÃÖ´ëÇã¿ë¼ö¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç Àü¹ÝÀû Á¶¿ì±Ô¹üÃøÁ¤°î¼±µµ °ÅÀÇ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À̹ÌÁö ³ëÃâ ¼ø¼­¿Í ¿òÁ÷ÀÌ´Â »ç¶÷ÀÇ ºñÀ²¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¶¿ì±âÁصµ Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª º» Áö¿ª°ú °°Àº ƯÁ¤ »óȲ¿¡¼­ Á¶¿ì±âÁØÀ» °³¹ßÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Á¤Àû À̹ÌÁö ´ë½Å º¸´Ù º¹ÀâÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¿ä±¸ÇÏ´Â µ¿Àû À̹ÌÁö¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¾ò´Â ÀÌÁ¡Àº ¾ø´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. º¸´Ù Á¤±³ÇÑ ¸ÅüÀ̿뿡 µû¸¥ Àå´ÜÁ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ÅäÀÇÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ´Ù¸¥ ÀÚ¿øÈ¯°æ Æò°¡¿¡ ¿òÁ÷ÀÓ ¶Ç´Â ¼Ò¸®¿Í °°Àº ¿ä¼ÒµéÀÌ Á¶¿ì±Ô¹ü¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸´Ù ¸¹Àº ¿¬±¸°¡ ¿ä±¸µÈ´Ù.
The usefulness of media representations for assessing normative standards depends in part on how accurately media reflect "on-the-ground" resource conditions. This study compared encounter standards based on still and moving pictures to assess movement effects. The study location was the Jungmoeri area of Mudeungsan Provincial Park (MPP) in Korea. A total of 50 college students participated in a laboratory experiment where they evaluated still and moving pictures constructed using Photoshop and Flash computer programs. For the maximum acceptable number (MAN), however, there was no significant difference of ratings between still and moving pictures, and the overall encounter norm curves were nearly identical. There were some "method findings" for ordering effects and percent of people moving, but for a resource manager developing standards there was no advantage to the more complex logistics of using moving pictures to assess this particular impact. The trade-offs of using more sophisticated media are discussed, and more research is needed to further explore factors such as movement of sound in evaluation of other resource conditions.
 
Ű¿öµå
±Ô¹ü±âÁØ;Á¤Àû À̹ÌÁö;µ¿Àû À̹ÌÁö;µµ¸³°ø¿ø;NORMATIVE STANDARDS;STILL AND MOVING PICTURES;PROVINCIAL PARK;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.23, no.4, 2009³â, pp.309-316
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200933063797696)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿