|
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.23, no.2, 2009³â, pp.208-219
|
¼Ó¸®»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ¹ýÁÖ»çÁö±¸ ¼Ò³ª¹«¸² ½Ä»ýõÀÌ¿Í ½Ä»ý°ü¸® ¿¬±¸
( Vegetation Succession and Vegetation Management of the Pinus densiflora S. et Z. Forest in the Beopjusa Area, Songnisan National $Park^{1a}$ ) |
À̰æÀç;±â°æ¼®;ÃÖÁø¿ì; ¼¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°úÇдëÇÐ;¼¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;(ÁÖ)±â¼ú»ç»ç¹«¼Ò L.E.T ºÎ¼³ ¿¡ÄÚÇ÷£¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¼Ó¸®»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ¹ýÁÖ»ç ÁÖº¯ ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶¸¦ ±Ô¸íÇϰí 17³â°£ÀÇ ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶ º¯È¸¦ ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²ÀÇ º¸Àü°ü¸®¹æ¾È ¼ö¸³À» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç´ë»óÁö´Â ¼Ó¸®»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ¹ýÁÖ»çÁö±¸ ³» ¼Ó¸®»ê°ü¸®»ç¹«¼Ò$sim$¹ýÁÖ»çÁö±¸ÀÇ $3.6km^2$ÀÌ´Ù. ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ý Á¶»ç°á°ú Àüü¸éÀû 360haÁß ¼Ò³ª¹« ¿ìÁ¡¸²Àº 64.7%À̾ú°í ¼Ò³ª¹«-³«¿±È°¿±¼ö ȥȿ¸²ÀÌ 3.2%·Î ÁÖ·Î °è°î »ç¸é°ú ´É¼±¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²ÀÌ ºÐÆ÷Çϰí ÀÖ¾ú°í °è°î ÅäÁöÀÌ¿ëÁö ÁÖº¯Àº ¼Ò³ª¹«¿Í ³«¿±È°¿±¼ö°¡ ȥȿµÈ Áö¿ªÀÌ »êÀçÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç±¸º° Æò±Õ »ó´ë¿ìÁ¡Ä¡¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿ìÁ¡Á¾ÀÇ ±¸¼ºÀ¸·Î ½Ä»ýÀ¯ÇüÀ» ºÐ·ùÇÑ °á°ú õÀÌÀáÀ缺ÀÌ ³·Àº ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý, õÀÌÀáÀ缺ÀÌ ³ôÀº ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý, õÀÌÁøÇàÁßÀÎ ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý, µµÅÂÁßÀÎ ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁýÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. 17³â°£ ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶ º¯È ºÐ¼®°á°ú ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁýÀÇ ÃµÀ̰æÇâÀº õÀÌÀáÀ缺ÀÌ ³·Àº ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý(¼Ò³ª¹« ¼ø¸²)$
ightarrow$õÀÌ ÀáÀ缺ÀÌ ³ôÀº ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý(¾Æ±³¸ñÃþ¿¡ ³«¿±È°¿±¼ö°¡ ¿ìÁ¡ÇÏ´Â ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²)$
ightarrow$õÀÌÁøÇà ÁßÀÎ ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý(¼Ò³ª¹«-»êº¢³ª¹«±ºÁý, ¼Ò³ª¹«-Á¹Âü³ª¹«±ºÁý)$
ightarrow$µµÅÂÁßÀÎ ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý(Á¹Âü³ª¹«-¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý, °¥Âü³ª¹«-¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý)$
ightarrow$³«¿±È°¿±¼öȥȿ±ºÁýÀ¸·Î ¹ß´ÞÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼Ò³ª¹«¸² ½Ä»ý°ü¸® ¹æ¾ÈÀ¸·Î õÀÌÀáÀ缺ÀÌ ³ôÀº ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁýÀº ¾Æ±³¸ñÃþ ³«¿±È°¿±¼ö¸¦ Á¦°ÅÇÏ´Â Àû±ØÀûÀÎ °ü¸®°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç õÀÌÁøÇàÁßÀÎ ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁýÀº ±³¸ñÃþ ³«¿±È°¿±¼ö °¡Ä¡Ä¡±â Á¤µµÀÇ ¼Ò±ØÀûÀÎ °ü¸®°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ¿´´Ù. µµÅµǴ ¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁýÀº ¼Ò³ª¹«¸²ÀÌ À¯ÁöµÇ±â ¾î·Á¿ì¹Ç·Î ³«¿±È°¿±¼ö¸²À¸·Î ÀÚ¿¬ÀûÀΠõÀ̰¡ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï À¯ÁöÇÏ´Â ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. |
|
This study is to establish a management method for conservation through comparison and analysis on vegetation structures of Pinus densiflora forest around Beopjusa area for past 17-year. The spatial range of the study was $3.6km^2$ from maintenance office to Beopjusa area. The analysis results of the actual vegetation showed that the ratio of vegetation were composed of 64.7% of Pinus densiflora forest, 3.2% of mixed forest of P. densiflora and deciduous broadleaf trees and 5.9% of deciduous broadleaf tree community out of overall area, 360ha. The type of P. densiflora forest were categorized into four communities; community having high potential of succession, community having low potential of it, the community being in the process of succession and community being in the process of natural selection. The succession tendency was in order of the community having low potential of succession(P. densiflora forest), having high potential of it(P. densiflora forest which is deciduous broadleaf trees are dominating in sub-canopy layer), being in the process of succession(P. densiflora-Prunus sargentii and P. densiflora-Quercus serrata community) and being in the process of natural selection(Q. serrata-P. densiflora and Q. aliena-P. densiflora community). In terms of vegetation management, P. densiflora forest having high potential of succession was needed to remove deciduous broadleaf trees in the sub-canopy layer and the community being in the process of succession was required to be pruning the branch in the canopy layer. Lastly, the community being in the process of natural selection was suggested to let it be in succession, since it is hard to be in the status of P. densiflora Forest. |
|
Ű¿öµå |
»ó´ë¿ìÁ¡Ä¡;½Ä»ý±¸Á¶;ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ý;µµÅÂ;³«¿±È°¿±¼ö¸²;IMPORTANCE PERCENTAGE;VEGETATION STRUCTURE;ACTUAL VEGETATION;NATURAL SELECTION;DECIDUOUS BROADLEAF TREES; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.23, no.2, 2009³â, pp.208-219
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200919463916204)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|