|
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.23, no.6, 2009³â, pp.585-593
|
±¹¸³°ø¿ø Ưº°º¸È£±¸ Á¤Ã¥¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áö¿ªÁֹΰú Ž¹æ°´ÀÇ ÀνĿ¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ - Áö¸®»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø Ä¥¼±°è°î ÀÚ¿¬È޽ijâÁ¦¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î -
( Perceptions of Residents and Visitors of the Policy for Special Protected Areas in Korean National Parks - A Case Study of the Nature Restoration Period in Chilsun Valley of Jirisan National Park - ) |
À¯±âÁØ;±èÁ¤¹Î;Á¶¿ì; »óÁö´ëÇб³ °ü±¤ÇкÎ;»óÁö´ëÇб³ °ü±¤ÇкÎ;»óÁö´ëÇб³ °ü±¤ÇкÎ;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
±¹¸³°ø¿ø Ưº°º¸È£±¸ Á¤Ã¥ÀÇ ÀÏȯÀÎ Áö¸®»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø Ä¥¼±°è°î ÀÚ¿¬È޽ijâÁ¦ ½Ç½Ã¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿µÇâ Áý´ÜÀÎ Áö¿ªÁֹΰú Ž¹æ°´ÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÀǰßÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ¿© º¸´Ù ü°èÀûÀÎ ±¹¸³°ø¿ø Ưº°º¸È£±¸ °ü¸® Á¤Ã¥°ú °ø¿ø°ü¸® ¹æ¾È ¼ö¸³À» À§ÇÑ ±âÃÊÀÚ·á Á¦°øÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ Ä¥¼±°è°î Àα٠Áö¿ªÀÎ Ãß¼º¸®, ±¤Á¡µ¿, ÀÇÁ߸®, ÀÇź¸®, ÀÇÆò¸® µî 5°³ Áö¿ª¿¡ °ÅÁÖÇϰí ÀÖ´Â Áö¿ªÁֹΰú ÁÖº¯ Áö¿ªÀ» ¹æ¹®ÇÑ Å½¹æ°´À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÆíÀÇÇ¥º»ÃßÃâ(convenience sampling)¹æ½ÄÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç°á°ú, Áö¿ªÁֹΰú Ž¹æ°´ ¸ðµÎ Ä¥¼±°è°îÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬ÀÚ¿ø °¡Ä¡¼ºÀ» ³ô°Ô Æò°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª ÀÚ¿¬È޽ijâÁ¦ÀÇ È¯°æº¸Àü È¿°ú´Â ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ³ª Ä¥¼±°è°î ÀÚ¿¬È޽ijâÁ¦ÀÇ °ü¸®Á¤Ã¥Àû ÀûÀý¼º°ú ÇÇÇØ Á¤µµ, Áö¼Ó ¿©ºÎ¿¡ À־ »ó´çÇÑ ½Ã°¢ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ƯÈ÷ Á¤Ã¥Àû Ãø¸é¿¡¼ÀÇ ÀûÀý¼º°ú Áö¿ª»çȸÀÇ ÇÇÇØ Á¤µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀνĿ¡ À־ ÁÖÁøÀԺο¡ÀÇ ÀÔÁö ¿©ºÎ¿¡ µû¶ó Áö¿ªÁֹΠ°£ Â÷À̵µ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª ÀÚ¿¬È޽ijâÁ¦ ½Ç½Ã¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ °£ÀÇ »ó´çÇÑ ÀνÄÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù. Çö ´Ü°èÀÇ °¥µîÀ» ÃÖ¼ÒÈÇϰí ÀÚ¿¬ÈÞ½Ä ³âÁ¦°¡ µµÀÔµÈ ¼Ò±âÀÇ ¼º°ú¸¦ ´Þ¼ºÇϱâ À§Çؼ´Â Áö¿ª»çȸ¿Í NGO µî Áö¿ªÀÇ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµé°úÀÇ ¿øÈ°ÇÑ ÀǰßÇùÀǸ¦ À§ÇÑ °ü¸®ÁÖüÀÇ ´Éµ¿ÀûÀÎ ÀÚ¼¼°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇϰí À̸¦ ¹Ý¿µÇÑ Çù·ÂÀû °ü¸®Àü·«ÀÇ µµÃâ°ú ¼ö¸³ÀÌ ¿ä¸ÁµÈ´Ù. |
|
This study is a survey on the general perceptions of the residents and visitors regarding the Nature Restoration Period in Chilsun Valley in Jirisan National park, and it was designed to establish systematic park management plan for the Special Protected Areas in Korean National Parks. This survey was conducted on the residents of five towns including Chuseong-ri, Gwangjum-dong, Uijung-ri, Uitan-ri and Uipyeong-ri, as well as visitors to Chilsun Valley by using convenience sampling. The result showed that those individuals or groups who responded to the survey were all positive about preservatory effect of Nature Restoration Period in the valley; however they also showed major perceptional differences as to the ways in which the nature restoration period managed. They also disagreed among themselves on the assessment of the extent of damage that could be generated due to the restoration, the appropriateness of the Nature Restoration Period as a management policy and maintenance of the policy in the future. The appropriateness as a policy and the extent of damage due to the Nature Restoration Period particularly showed some serious perceptional differences among five resident groups based on the location of their towns. To minimize current conflict and achieve the goal of Nature Restoration Period, the park management authorities need to communicate more actively with the stakeholders of the local community and NGOs, and secure their support and cooperation by accommodating their ideas and opinions to build a strategic partnership. |
|
Ű¿öµå |
°ø¿ø°ü¸®;ȯ°æº¸Àü È¿°ú;°ü¸®Á¤Ã¥;ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ;°ü¸®Àü·«;PARK MANAGEMENT;PRESERVATORY EFFECT;PARK POLICY;STAKEHOLDERS;STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.23, no.6, 2009³â, pp.585-593
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200912368301447)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|