¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.24, no.6, 2010³â, pp.708-722
´öÀ¯»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ÇâÀûºÀ ÀÏ´ë ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶ ¿¬±¸
( Vegetation Structure of the Hyangjeokbong in the Deogyusan National Park )
±èÇö¼÷;ÀÌ»ó¸í;¼ÛÈ£°æ; Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;±¹¸³Áß¾Ó°úÇаü;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ´öÀ¯»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ÇâÀûºÀÀÏ´ë »ê¸² ½Ä»ýÀ» ½Ä¹°»çȸÇÐÀû ¹æ¹ý°ú ±¸¹èºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, ½Å°¥³ª¹«±º¶ô(öÂßÇÏÀ§±º¶ô, ÀüÇüÇÏÀ§±º¶ô), Á¹Âü³ª¹«±º¶ô, ±¼Âü³ª¹«±º¶ô, ¼Ò³ª¹«±º¶ô, ÃþÃþ³ª¹«±º¶ô, µé¸Þ³ª¹«±º¶ô ¹× ÁÖ¸ñ ±º¶ôÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ±º¶ô °£¿¡´Â Á¾Á¶¼º, °èÃþ±¸Á¶ ¹× ½ÄÇÇÀ² µî »ýÅÂÀû Ư¡¿¡ ¸¹Àº Â÷À̰¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¶»çµÇ¾ú´Ù. Àüü ±º¶ô¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³­ Áß¿äÄ¡´Â ½Å°¥³ª¹«°¡ °¡Àå ³ô°í(81.2) ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î µé¸Þ³ª¹«, Á¹Âü³ª¹«, ¼Ò³ª¹«, ´ç´Üdz, ±¼Âü³ª¹«, öÂß, ÃþÃþ³ª¹«, ÁÖ¸ñ µîÀÇ ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù. Áß¿äÄ¡°¡ ³ôÀº ÁÖ¿äÁ¾¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Èä°íÁ÷°æ±ÞÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú ½Å°¥³ª¹«¿Í Á¹Âü³ª¹«´Â °è¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ¿ìÁ¡µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁú °ÍÀ̸ç, µé¸Þ³ª¹«´Â °è°îºÎ¿¡ ±º¶ôÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ°í ¿ªJÀÚÇü¿¡ °¡±î¿î ºÐÆ÷·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª ÁöÇüÀû ±Ø»ó¸²À¸·Î ¹ß´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ¼Ò³ª¹«¿Í ÁÖ¸ñÀº ´çºÐ°£ ¿ìÁ¡µµ »óŸ¦ À¯Áö ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÇ¸ç, ±¼Âü³ª¹«¿Í ÃþÃþ³ª¹«´Â Á¤±ÔºÐÆ÷ÇüÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»°í ÀÖ¾î Çö»óÅ·Π°è¼Ó ¿ìÁ¡µµ¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ½Ä¹°»çȸÇÐÀû ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ºÐ·ùµÈ 7°³ ±º¶ô°ú 12°³ÀÇ È¯°æ ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î DCCA ordination ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú ½Å°¥³ª¹«±º¶ô°ú ÁÖ¸ñ±º¶ôÀº ÇØ¹ß°í°¡ ³ô°í °ÇÁ¶Çϰí CaÀÇ ¾ç·á°¡ ÀûÀ¸¸ç pH°¡ ºñ±³Àû ³·Àº °÷¿¡ ºÐÆ÷ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Á¹Âü³ª¹«±º¶ôÀº ÇØ¹ß°í°¡ ³·°í ¼öºÐÀÌ ºñ±³Àû ¸¹Àº Áö¿ª¿¡ ºÐÆ÷ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼Ò³ª¹«±º¶ôÀº ³²»ç¸éÀÇ ÇØ¹ß°í°¡ Áß°£ Á¤µµÀ̰í pH°¡ ³·°í Ca µîÀÇ ¾ç·á°¡ ÀûÀº °ÇÁ¶ÇÑ Áö¿ª¿¡ ºÐÆ÷ÇÏ¿´´Ù. µé¸Þ³ª¹«±º¶ôÀº ÇØ¹ß°í°¡ ³·°í ¼öºÐÀÌ ¸¹Àº °è°îºÎ¿¡ ºÐÆ÷Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, CaÀÇ ¾ç·á°¡ ¸¹À¸¸ç pH°¡ ³ôÀº Áö¿ª¿¡ ºÐÆ÷ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
This study was carried out to classify vegetation structure of the Hyangjeokbong in the Deogyusan National Park using the gradient analysis and phytosociological method. The vegetation was classified into Quercus mongolica community(Rhododendron schlippenbachii subcommunity, typical subcommunity), Q. serrata community, Q. variabillis community, Pinus densiflora community, Cornus controversa community, Fraxinus mandshurica community and Taxus cuspidata community. Ecological characteristics such as species composition, layer structure, vegetation ratio, and the distribution of individual trees by DBH(diameter at breast height) were significantly different among communities. The order of important value of the forest community with DBH 2cm above plants was Q. mongolica(81.2), F. mandshurica, Q. serrata, P. densiflora, Acer pseudosieboldianum, Q. variabillis, Rhododendron schlippenbachii, C. controversa, T. cuspidata. Distribution of DBH of Q. mongolica and Q. serrata had suggesting a continuous domination of these species over the other species for the time being. In contrast, F. mandshurica appeared limited to the valley of the sheet and a higher frequency of young individuals, suggesting a continuous domination of these species the development of a climax forest terrain. P. densiflora and T. cuspidata had suggesting a continuous domination of these species over the other species for the time being in maintain. Q. variabilis and C. controversa had a formality distribution, suggesting a continuous domination of these species over the other species for the time being. This study examined the correlation between each community and the environment according to DCCA ordination. The Q. mongolica community and T. cuspidata community predominated in the highest elevation habitats which had few moisture, Ca and in the low pH. The Q. serrata community mainly occurred in the low elevation habitats which had many moisture. P. densiflora community predominated in the middle elevation and south-facing slope habitats which had few moisture, Ca and in the low pH. F. mandshurica community predominated in the low elevation habitats which had many moisture, Ca and pH.
 
Ű¿öµå
½Ä¹°»çȸÇÐ;Èä°íÁ÷°æ±Þ;Áß¿äÄ¡;PHYTOSOCIOLOGICAL;DCCA ORDINATION;DBH;IMPORTANCE VALUE;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.24, no.6, 2010³â, pp.708-722
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201015037856280)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿