¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.25, no.1, 2011³â, pp.91-101
¿Á»ó³ìÈ­¿ë Ãʺ»½Ä¹°ÀÇ ¼ø°£ $CO_2$ Èí¼ö ¹× Áõ¹ß»ê·® ºÐ¼®
( The Analysis of Instantaneous $CO_2$ Uptake and Evapotranspiration of Herbaceous Plants for Artificial Roof Greening )
¾È±Ù¿µ;Çѽ¿ø;ÀÌÀºÈñ; ¼­¿ï¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇдëÇÐ;³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø;¼­¿ï¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ»ý¸í°úÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÀúÅä½É ¿Á»ó³ìÈ­¿¡ Àû¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ Ãʺ»·ù ¹× ÁöÇǽŰÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ½Ä¹°ÀÇ ±¤ÇÕ¼ºÀÛ¿ëÀ» ÅëÇÑ $CO_2$ Èí¼ö·®°ú Áõ¹ß»ê·®À» Á¤·®È­ÇÏ¿© µµ½Ã¹Ì±âÈÄ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¿Á»ó³ìÈ­½Ä¹°ÀÇ È¯°æ¼º´ÉÀ» Æò°¡ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ ¿Á»ó³ìÈ­¿ë Ãʺ»·ù 7Á¾À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Àû¿Ü¼± $CO_2$ °¡½º ºÐ¼®±â¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ $CO_2$ ±³È¯ ¼Óµµ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ °¢ ½Ä¹°ÀÇ $CO_2$ Èí¼ö·®°ú Áõ¹ß»ê·®À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè±â°£Àº »ýÀåÀÌ È°¹ßÇØÁö±â ½ÃÀÛÇÏ´Â 5¿ùºÎÅÍ 11¿ù±îÁö ¸Å¿ù 2¹Ýº¹ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í, ÁÖº¯ ȯ°æ¿¡ ¿¹¹ÎÇÑ Ãʺ»·ùÀÇ Æ¯¼º»ó, ȯ°æº¯¼ö°¡ °íÁ¤µÈ ½Ç³»¿¡¼­ ±¤µµÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ÁÖ¾î ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. $CO_2$ Èí¼ö·®°ú Áõ¹ß»ê·®À» »êÃâÇÑ °á°ú ´ÜÀ§¿±¸éÀû´ç $CO_2$ Èí¼ö·®Àº Ãʺ»·ù Áß ±¸ÀýÃʰ¡ $21.47{ imes}10^{-6}g/cm^2/s$, ¸Å¹ßÅé²ÉÀÌ $12.74;g{ imes}10^{-6}g/cm^2/s$·Î ³ôÀº Èí¼öÀ²À» º¸¿´°í, ÄËÅÍŰºí·ç±×·¡½ºµµ $16.20{ imes}10^{-6}g/cm^2/s$·Î ºñ±³Àû ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ´ÜÀ§¿±¸éÀû´ç Áõ¹ß»ê·®Àº ÄËÅÍŰºí·ç±×·¡½º°¡$8.75{ imes}10^{-5}g/cm^2/s$·Î °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í, ´ÙÀ½Àº ¸Å¹ßÅé²É $8.66{ imes}10^{-5}g/cm^2/s$, ±¸ÀýÃÊ $8.58{ imes}10^{-5}g/cm^2/s$ ¼øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the positive effects of artificial ground greening on the reduction of carbon dioxide ($CO_2$) which can help improve ecological functions in cities and mitigation of climate change, through quantifying $CO_2$ uptake and evapotranspiration by the process of photosynthesis of some plants. Experiment of $CO_2$ uptake and evapotranspiration was conducted by measurement of $CO_2$ exchange rate using the infrared gas analyzer, for 7 month, growing season from May to November 2009, 2 times a month. The result was as follows; The $CO_2$ uptake quantity per $cm^2$ of Chrysanthemum zawadskii was the highest rate at $21.47{ imes}10^{-6}g/cm^2/s$ and Poa pratensis was $16.20g{ imes}10^{-6}g/cm^2/s$. The stronger was light of intensity, the higher were $CO_2$ uptake rate of most plants. In quantity of evapotranspiration, Poa pratensis was the highest rate at $8.75{ imes}10^{-5}g/cm^2/s$ and Aquilegia buergariana was $8.66{ imes}10^{-5}g/cm^2/s$. From this study, it is confirmed that artificial ground greening has capacity of absorption $CO_2$ and effects on improving urban microclimate.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÀΰøÁö¹Ý³ìÈ­;¹Ì±âÈÄ È¿°ú;ź¼ÒÀú°¨;µµ½Ã¿­¼¶Çö»ó;GREEN ROOF;URBAN MICRO-CLIMATE;${CO_2}$REDUCTION;HEAT ISLAND EFFECTS;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.25, no.1, 2011³â, pp.91-101
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201117148818784)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿