|
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.25, no.1, 2011³â, pp.37-46
|
´öÀ¯»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ý ºÐÆ÷ÇöȲ ¹× õÀÌ ¿¬±¸
( Actual Vegetation Distribution Status and Ecological Succession in the Deogyusan National Park ) |
±èÇö¼÷;ÀÌ»ó¸í;¼ÛÈ£°æ; Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;±¹¸³Áß¾Ó°úÇаü;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
|
ÃÊ ·Ï |
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ´öÀ¯»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø »ê¸² ½Ä»ýÀ» »ó°üÁ¶»ç¿Í ÇöÁö½Ä»ýÁ¶»ç¸¦ Åä´ë·Î ´öÀ¯»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ýµµ¸¦ ÀÛ¼ºÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ó°ü¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ýÀº 42°³ À¯ÇüÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, Á¶»çÁö¿ª ÀüüÀÇ »ê¸² ½Ä»ý Áß¿¡¼ ½Å°¥³ª¹«¸²ÀÌ 39.08%·Î °¡Àå ³Ð°Ô ºÐÆ÷ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î ±¼Âü³ª¹«¸², ¼Ò³ª¹«¸², µé¸Þ³ª¹«¸²ÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î Â÷ÁöÇÏ¿© ´öÀ¯»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀº Ÿ ±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ »ê¸²°ú ºñ±³ÇÒ ¶§ µé¸Þ³ª¹«¸²ÀÌ ¸¹ÀÌ ºÐÆ÷µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀÌ Æ¯Â¡ÀÌ´Ù. ´öÀ¯»ê±¹¸³°ø¿ø ½Ä»ýÀ» ȯ°æ±¸¹è¿¡ µû¶ó ±¸ºÐÇÏ¸é ³«¿±È°¿±¼ö¸²(Âü³ª¹«·ù¸², °è°î¸²), ħ¿±¼ö¸²(¼Ò³ª¹«¸²), ¾Æ°í»ê¸²(ÁÖ¸ñ¸², ±¸»ó³ª¹«¸², öÂß°ü¸ñ¸², ÃÊ¿ø) µî 7°³ÀÇ À¯ÇüÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾îÁ³´Ù. Áß¿äÄ¡°¡ ³ôÀº ÁÖ¿äÁ¾¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Èä°íÁ÷°æ±ÞÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú ½Å°¥³ª¹«¿Í ±¼Âü³ª¹«´Â ¾î¸° °³Ã¼¿Í Áß°£ °³Ã¼ÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ô°í Á¹Âü³ª¹«, ¼¾î³ª¹«´Â ¾î¸°°³Ã¼ÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ô¾Æ °è¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ¿ìÁ¡µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁú °ÍÀ̸ç, µé¸Þ³ª¹« ´Â °è°îºÎ¿¡ ±º¶ôÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ°í ¾î¸°°³Ã¼ÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ôÀº ¿ªJÀÚÇü¿¡ °¡±î¿î ºÐÆ÷·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª ÁöÇüÀû ±Ø»ó¸²À¸·Î ¹ß´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÃßÁ¤µÈ´Ù. ¼Ò³ª¹«, ¹°¹Ú´Þ³ª¹«, ÃþÃþ³ª¹«, °ÅÁ¦¼ö³ª¹«, ±¸»ó³ª¹«, ÁÖ¸ñÀº ¾î¸°°³Ã¼¿Í Å«°³Ã¼ÀÇ ¹Ðµµ´Â ³·°í Áß°£°³Ã¼ÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ôÀº Á¤±ÔºÐÆ÷ÇüÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»°í ÀÖ¾î Çö»óÅ·Π°è¼Ó ¿ìÁ¡µµ¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. |
|
This study was written about the actual vegetation map by researchig current vegetation and on-site vegetation in the Deogyusan National Park. Current vegetation patterns were classified into 42 types according to correlation. And Quercus mongolica forest was 39.08% out of the total forest vegetation, and was dispersed the most widely. Next were Q. variabilis, Pinus densiflora, and Fraxinus mandshurica forests in order, so that the forests of Deogyusan are different from those of another national parks in that F. mandshurica forest is more widely dispersed. Forest vegetation of Deogyusan national park is broadly classified into three types: deciduous broad-leaved forest (Quercus forest and valley forest), coniferous forest(P. densiflora forest), and sub-alpine forest(Taxus cuspidata forest, Abies koreana, Rhododendron schlippenbachii shrub-forest, and prairie). Distribution of DBH of Q. mongolica and Q. variabillis had a higher frequency of young individuals and middle individuals, Q. serrata and Carpinus laxiflora had a higher frequency of young individuals, suggesting a continuous domination of these species over the other species for the time being. In contrast, F. mandshurica appeared limited to the valley of the sheet and a higher frequency of young individuals, suggesting a continuous domination of these species the development of a climax forest terrain. P. densiflora, Betula davurica, Cornus controversa, B. costata, A. koreana and T. cuspidata had a formality distribution, suggesting a continuous domination of these species over the other species for the time being. |
|
Ű¿öµå |
ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ýµµ;½Ä»ýõÀÌ;½Ä»ýÀ¯Çü;Èä°íÁ÷°æ±Þ;ACTUAL VEGETATION MAP;VEGETATION SUCCESSION;VEGETATION PATTERN;DBH; |
|
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.25, no.1, 2011³â, pp.37-46
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201117148818706)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|