¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.24, no.5, 2010³â, pp.575-581
ºñ¿ÀÅéÁöµµ ½Å·Úµµ ÆÇ´ÜÀ» À§ÇÑ ½Ä»ýÀ¯Çü °ø°£±¸È¹ÀÇ Á¤È®¼º °íÂû
( Analysis of the Delineation Accuracy of Vegetation Type for the Information Reliability of the Biotope - Case Study of Seoul Biotope Map - )
Á¶¿ì;È«¼®È¯;°ûÁ¤ÀÎ;ÇѺÀÈ£; »óÁö´ëÇб³ °ü±¤ÇкÎ;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã»ýÅÂÇבּ¸½Ç;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø Á¶°æÇаú;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ Á¶°æÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â µµ½Ã»ýÅÂ°è º¸Àü ¹× º¹¿øÀ» À§ÇÑ ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î Ȱ¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ºñ¿ÀÅéÁ¶»çÀÚ·áÀÇ ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç Á¤È®µµ¸¦ °ËÁõÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ ¼­¿ï½Ã °ü¾Ç±¸ »ê¸²Áö¿ªÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 2000³â°ú 2005³âÀÇ ºñ¿ÀÅé ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç °á°ú¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÀΰøÀ§¼º¿µ»ó¿¡¼­ È®Àΰ¡´ÉÇÑ »ó·Ïħ¿±¼ö¸²À» ÃßÃâÇÑ ÈÄ µÎ ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç°á°ú¿¡ ±âÃÊÇÏ¿© ÇöÀåÁ¶»çÀÇ Á¤È®¼ºÀ» °ËÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¼¼ºÎ ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ýÀÇ ¸éÀûºñÀ²Àº ½Ã±â¿Í Á¶»çÀÚÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ¿¡µµ ¾à 92%ÀÇ ³ôÀº À¯»çµµ¸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª, µÎ Á¶»ç¿¡¼­ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ½Ä»ýÀ¯ÇüÀÌ Áö¸®°ø°£»ó ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â Áö¿ªÀº ¾à 60%¿¡ ºÒ°úÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀΰøÀ§¼º¿µ»ó¿¡¼­ ÃßÃâÇÑ »ó·Ïħ¿±¼öÀÇ À§Ä¡ ºÐ¼® °á°ú 2000³â Á¶»ç¿Í´Â 69.4%, 2005³â°ú´Â 80.0%°¡ ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Âµ¥, ÀΰøÀ§¼º ¿µ»ó ÆÇµ¶¿À·ù¸¦ °¨¾ÈÇßÀ» ¶§ ºñ±³Àû ³ôÀº Á¤È®µµ¸¦ º¸À̰í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Áö±Ý±îÁö ºñ¿ÀÅéÁ¶»ç½Ã ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ½Ä»ý±¸ºÐ ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤È®¼º °ËÁõÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁöÁö ¾Ê°í ¼öÇàµÇ¾î ¿ÔÀ¸³ª, ÇâÈÄ ÀÚ·áÀÇ °»½ÅÀ̳ª ½Å±Ô »ç¾÷¿¡ À־´Â Á¤È®µµ °ËÁõÀÌ ¹«¾ùº¸´Ù Áß¿äÇϸç ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±¸Ã¼Àû ±âÁظ¶·ÃÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
This study was accomplished for verifying the biotope field survey accuracy in the forests. Biotope data is used as the standard for the preservation and restoration of the urban ecosystem. The study area is the forests of Gwanak-gu, Seoul. For verifying accuracy, first we compared biotope field survey results between 2000 and 2005, second we compared between field survey results and satellite imagery. For comparing with satellite imagery, we delineated the evergreen-coniferous forests from imagery taken during winter season. As a result of comparison, the ratio of most actual vegetation types by delineated detail field surveys were matched around 92% between 2000 and 2005. But, between 2 field surveys, around 60% of total vegetation type was regionally matched. Evergreen-coniferous forests extracted by satellite imagery were regionally matched 69.4% of field survey result in 2000, and matched 80% of the result in 2005. If we consider the delineating errors from deciphering the picture, the results have high accuracy, especially 2005. The processes of verifying accuracy have not been proceeding in the part of delineating actual vegetation works. The verification of accuracy is important for the renewal process. Thus, the various verification methods will be studied and criteria should be developed for enhancing objectivity.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÇöÁ¸½Ä»ý;ºñ¿ÀÅé ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç;Á¤È®µµ °ËÁõ;»ó·Ïħ¿±¼ö¸²;ACTUAL VEGETATION;BIOTOPE FIELDSURVEY;ACCURACY VERIFICATION;EVERGREEN CONIFEROUS FOREST;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.24, no.5, 2010³â, pp.575-581
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201011949350403)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿