¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.24, no.5, 2010³â, pp.547-555
Áö¸®»ê ¿õ¼®ºÀÁö¿ªÀÇ »ê¸²±ºÁý±¸Á¶
( Vegetation Structure of the Woongseokbong in the Jirisan(Mt.) )
¾ÈÇöö;Ãß°©Ã¶; ÁøÁÖ»ê¾÷´ëÇб³ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;ÁøÁÖ»ê¾÷´ëÇб³ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Áö¸®»ê±¹¸³°ø¿øÀÇ µ¿ºÎÁö¿ª¿¡ ÀÎÁ¢ÇÑ ¿õ¼®ºÀÁö¿ªÀÇ ½Ä»ý±¸Á¶¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰíÀÚ ¹ã¸Ó¸®Àç-¿õ¼®ºÀ±¸°£¿¡ ¹æÇü±¸($400m^2$) 25°³¸¦ ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿© ½Ä»ýÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½Ä¹° ±ºÁýºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ºÐ·ùÇÑ °á°ú ½Å°¥³ª¹«-¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý, ¶±°¥³ª¹«±ºÁý, ½Å°¥³ª¹«-¶±°¥³ª¹«±ºÁýÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¿õ¼®ºÀÁö¿ªÀÇ ½Ä»ýÀº ½Å°¥³ª¹«°¡ °¡Àå ¿ìÁ¡Çϰí, ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î ¶±°¥³ª¹«, ±¼Âü³ª¹«, ¼Ò³ª¹«, ´ç´Üdz µîÀÌ ¿ìÁ¡Çϰí ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ ±¼Âü³ª¹«, ¼Ò³ª¹«°¡ ºÎºÐÀûÀ¸·Î ¿ìÁ¡Á¾À¸·Î ºÐÆ÷Çϰí ÀÖÁö¸¸, Á¡Â÷ÀûÀ¸·Î ¼Ò³ª¹«ÀÇ »ó´ë¿ìÁ¡Ä¡´Â ÀÛ¾ÆÁö´Â ¹Ý¸é¿¡ ½Å°¥³ª¹«, ±¼Âü³ª¹«, ¶±°¥³ª¹«ÀÇ ¿ìÁ¡Ä¡°¡ Á¡Â÷ Ä¿Á® ÀüÇüÀûÀÎ ½Å°¥³ª¹«, ±¼Âü³ª¹«, ¶±°¥³ª¹«ÀÇ È¥È¿¸²À¸·Î õÀ̰¡ ÀϾ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÈ´Ù. ¼öÁ¾°£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¿¡¼­´Â ¼Ò³ª¹«¿Í »êÃʳª¹«, »ý°­³ª¹«, ½Å°¥³ª¹«¿Í Áø´Þ·¡, Âʵ¿¹é³ª¹«¿Í öÂß, ¼è¹°Çª·¹¿Í »êÃʳª¹«, Âʵ¿¹é³ª¹«, ´ç´Üdz°ú ¹°Çª·¹³ª¹«, ÃþÃþ³ª¹«¿Í È÷¾î¸® µîÀÇ ¼öÁ¾µé °£¿¡´Â ³ôÀº Á¤ÀÇ»ó°üÀÌ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú°í, ¶±°¥³ª¹«¿Í ½Å°¥³ª¹«, ºñ¸ñ³ª¹«¿Í ½Å°¥³ª¹«, ±¼Âü³ª¹«, ½Å°¥³ª¹«¿Í ³«¿±¼Û, ±¼Âü³ª¹«, ³ë¸°À糪¹«¿Í Áø´Þ·¡ µîÀÇ ¼öÁ¾µé °£¿¡´Â ¾àÇÑ ºÎÀÇ»ó°üÀÌ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. Á¶»çÁöÀÇ ±ºÁýº° Á¾´Ù¾ç¼º Áö¼ö´Â 0.09832~1.1102 ¹üÀ§·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
To investigate the vegetation structure of mountain ridge from Bammeorijae to Woongseokbong, 25 plots($400m^2$) selected by random sampling method were surveyed. Three groups of Quercus mongolica - Pinus densiflora community, Q. dentata community and Q. mongolica - Q. dentata community were classified by cluster analysis. Q. dentata, Q. variabilis, Pinus densiflora, Acer pseudosieboldianum and Q. mongolica were found as mostly dominant woody plant species in the Woongseok-bong area. In the future, the importance percentage of Pinus densiflora might be eventually decreased, but those of Q. mongolica, Q. variabilis and Q. dendata might be gradually increased. There were strong positive correlations between Pinus densiflora, Zanthoxylum piperium and Lindera obtusiloba; Q. mongolica and Rhododendron mucronulatum; Styrax obassia and R. schlippenbachii; Fraxinus sieboldiana, Zanthoxylum piperium and Styrax obassia; Acer pseudosieboldianum and Fraxinus sieboldiana; Cornus controversa and Corylopsis coreana were relatively weak negative correlations between Q. dentata and Q. mongolica; Lindera erythrocarpa, Q. mongolica and Q. variabilis; Q. mongolica, Larix leptolepis and Q. variabilis; Symplocos chinensis for. pilosa and Rhododendron mucronulatum. Species diversity index(H') of investigated groups was ranged from 0.09832 to 1.1102.
 
Ű¿öµå
Á¾ÀÇ »ó°ü¼º;Á¾´Ù¾ç¼º;½Å°¥³ª¹«-¼Ò³ª¹«±ºÁý;¶±°¥³ª¹«±ºÁý;½Å°¥³ª¹«-¶±°¥³ª¹«±ºÁý;SPECIES CORRELATION;SPECIES DIVERSITY;Quercus mongolica - Pinus densiflora COMMUNITY;Q. dentata COMMUNITY;Q. mongolica - Q. dentata COMMUNITY;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.24, no.5, 2010³â, pp.547-555
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201011949350398)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿